Cargando…
Determination of permeation properties of hydrogen gas in sealing rubbers using thermal desorption analysis gas chromatography
Permeation properties of hydrogen gas (H(2)) into nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM), and fluoroelastomer (FKM) which are the strong candidates for sealing material in H(2) energy infrastructures, was quantified using a thermal desorption analysis gas chromatogra...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96266-y |
Sumario: | Permeation properties of hydrogen gas (H(2)) into nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM), and fluoroelastomer (FKM) which are the strong candidates for sealing material in H(2) energy infrastructures, was quantified using a thermal desorption analysis gas chromatography (TDA GC) and a self-developed diffusion-analysis program. The samples were charged with H(2) in a high-pressure chamber for 24 h then decompressed into atmosphere, and the mass of H(2) released from the sample was measured as a function of elapsed time after decompression. The developed program calculated the total charging amount C(0) and diffusivity D, which were then used to calculate the H(2) solubility S and permeability P for variation of pressure. The samples were polymerized with and without carbon black (CB) filler in cylindrical shapes with different diameters. There was no appreciable pressure up to 12 MPa or diameter dependence investigated in this study on D, S and P. NBR and EPDM showed dual hydrogen diffusion with fast and slow diffusion behaviors caused by CB, whereas FKM showed a single diffusion behavior. The determined D are D(fast, NBR) = (1.55 ± 0.28) × 10(–10) m(2)/s, D(slow, NBR) = (3.1 ± 0.5) × 10(–11) m(2)/s, D(fast, EPDM) = (3.65 ± 0.66) × 10(–10) m(2)/s, D(slow, EPDM) = (3.3 ± 0.5) × 10(–11) m(2)/s, D(FKM) = (7.7 ± 0.8) × 10(–11) m(2)/s. It appeared that the filler contributes to increase S and decrease D. The uncertainty analysis against the evaluated data was carried out, too, in order that the method could be applicable as a standard test for the permeation properties of various polymer membranes. |
---|