Cargando…

Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Progressive fibrosis has been identified as the major predictor of mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several biomarkers are currently being evaluated for their ability to substitute the liver biopsy as the reference standard. Recent clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erhardtsen, Elisabeth, Rasmussen, Daniel G.K., Frederiksen, Peder, Leeming, Diana Julie, Shevell, Diane, Gluud, Lise Lotte, Karsdal, Morten Asser, Aithal, Guruprasad P., Schattenberg, Jörn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34466796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100317
_version_ 1783742053477253120
author Erhardtsen, Elisabeth
Rasmussen, Daniel G.K.
Frederiksen, Peder
Leeming, Diana Julie
Shevell, Diane
Gluud, Lise Lotte
Karsdal, Morten Asser
Aithal, Guruprasad P.
Schattenberg, Jörn M.
author_facet Erhardtsen, Elisabeth
Rasmussen, Daniel G.K.
Frederiksen, Peder
Leeming, Diana Julie
Shevell, Diane
Gluud, Lise Lotte
Karsdal, Morten Asser
Aithal, Guruprasad P.
Schattenberg, Jörn M.
author_sort Erhardtsen, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: Progressive fibrosis has been identified as the major predictor of mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several biomarkers are currently being evaluated for their ability to substitute the liver biopsy as the reference standard. Recent clinical studies in NAFLD/NASH patients support the utility of PRO-C3, a marker of type III collagen formation, as a marker for the degree of fibrosis, disease activity, and effect of treatment. Here we establish the healthy reference range, optimal sample handling conditions for both short- and long-term serum storage, and robustness for the PRO-C3 assay. METHODS: PRO-C3 was measured in 269 healthy volunteers and in 222 NAFLD patients. Robustness of the PRO-C3 assay was measured according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards and included validation of interference, precision, and reagent stability, whilst sample stability was defined for storage at different temperatures and for 3 freeze-thaw cycles. Fibrosis scoring was based on histological assessments and used as a reference for the diagnostic ability of PRO-C3 to discriminate between patients with different levels of fibrosis. RESULTS: Robustness of the PRO-C3 analysis validated by interference, precision, and reagent stability was found to be within the predefined acceptance criteria. The healthy reference range was determined to be 6.1–14.7 ng/ml. Levels of PRO-C3 were not affected by sex, age, BMI, or ethnicity. Levels of PRO-C3 were able to identify patients with clinically significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis (AUC = 0.83 (95% CI [0.77–0.88], p <0.0001), and AUC = 0.79 (95% CI [0.73–0.85], p <0.0001), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The assay proved to be robust and sample stability was found to comply with hospital sample handling requirements. PRO-C3 measured in samples from patients with NAFLD/NASH was diagnostic for significant and advanced liver fibrosis. LAY SUMMARY: We showed that PRO-C3 levels were stable under conditions conforming with hospital sample-handling requirements. We determined a healthy reference range and showed that PRO-C3 levels were not associated with sex, age, BMI, or ethnicity. Finally, we provide further evidence of an association of PRO-C3 with increasing liver fibrosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8385245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83852452021-08-30 Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis Erhardtsen, Elisabeth Rasmussen, Daniel G.K. Frederiksen, Peder Leeming, Diana Julie Shevell, Diane Gluud, Lise Lotte Karsdal, Morten Asser Aithal, Guruprasad P. Schattenberg, Jörn M. JHEP Rep Research Article BACKGROUND & AIMS: Progressive fibrosis has been identified as the major predictor of mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several biomarkers are currently being evaluated for their ability to substitute the liver biopsy as the reference standard. Recent clinical studies in NAFLD/NASH patients support the utility of PRO-C3, a marker of type III collagen formation, as a marker for the degree of fibrosis, disease activity, and effect of treatment. Here we establish the healthy reference range, optimal sample handling conditions for both short- and long-term serum storage, and robustness for the PRO-C3 assay. METHODS: PRO-C3 was measured in 269 healthy volunteers and in 222 NAFLD patients. Robustness of the PRO-C3 assay was measured according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards and included validation of interference, precision, and reagent stability, whilst sample stability was defined for storage at different temperatures and for 3 freeze-thaw cycles. Fibrosis scoring was based on histological assessments and used as a reference for the diagnostic ability of PRO-C3 to discriminate between patients with different levels of fibrosis. RESULTS: Robustness of the PRO-C3 analysis validated by interference, precision, and reagent stability was found to be within the predefined acceptance criteria. The healthy reference range was determined to be 6.1–14.7 ng/ml. Levels of PRO-C3 were not affected by sex, age, BMI, or ethnicity. Levels of PRO-C3 were able to identify patients with clinically significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis (AUC = 0.83 (95% CI [0.77–0.88], p <0.0001), and AUC = 0.79 (95% CI [0.73–0.85], p <0.0001), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The assay proved to be robust and sample stability was found to comply with hospital sample handling requirements. PRO-C3 measured in samples from patients with NAFLD/NASH was diagnostic for significant and advanced liver fibrosis. LAY SUMMARY: We showed that PRO-C3 levels were stable under conditions conforming with hospital sample-handling requirements. We determined a healthy reference range and showed that PRO-C3 levels were not associated with sex, age, BMI, or ethnicity. Finally, we provide further evidence of an association of PRO-C3 with increasing liver fibrosis. Elsevier 2021-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8385245/ /pubmed/34466796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100317 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Erhardtsen, Elisabeth
Rasmussen, Daniel G.K.
Frederiksen, Peder
Leeming, Diana Julie
Shevell, Diane
Gluud, Lise Lotte
Karsdal, Morten Asser
Aithal, Guruprasad P.
Schattenberg, Jörn M.
Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis
title Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis
title_full Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis
title_fullStr Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis
title_short Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis
title_sort determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing pro-c3 – a biomarker of liver fibrosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34466796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100317
work_keys_str_mv AT erhardtsenelisabeth determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis
AT rasmussendanielgk determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis
AT frederiksenpeder determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis
AT leemingdianajulie determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis
AT shevelldiane determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis
AT gluudliselotte determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis
AT karsdalmortenasser determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis
AT aithalguruprasadp determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis
AT schattenbergjornm determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis