Cargando…
Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Progressive fibrosis has been identified as the major predictor of mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several biomarkers are currently being evaluated for their ability to substitute the liver biopsy as the reference standard. Recent clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34466796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100317 |
_version_ | 1783742053477253120 |
---|---|
author | Erhardtsen, Elisabeth Rasmussen, Daniel G.K. Frederiksen, Peder Leeming, Diana Julie Shevell, Diane Gluud, Lise Lotte Karsdal, Morten Asser Aithal, Guruprasad P. Schattenberg, Jörn M. |
author_facet | Erhardtsen, Elisabeth Rasmussen, Daniel G.K. Frederiksen, Peder Leeming, Diana Julie Shevell, Diane Gluud, Lise Lotte Karsdal, Morten Asser Aithal, Guruprasad P. Schattenberg, Jörn M. |
author_sort | Erhardtsen, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND & AIMS: Progressive fibrosis has been identified as the major predictor of mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several biomarkers are currently being evaluated for their ability to substitute the liver biopsy as the reference standard. Recent clinical studies in NAFLD/NASH patients support the utility of PRO-C3, a marker of type III collagen formation, as a marker for the degree of fibrosis, disease activity, and effect of treatment. Here we establish the healthy reference range, optimal sample handling conditions for both short- and long-term serum storage, and robustness for the PRO-C3 assay. METHODS: PRO-C3 was measured in 269 healthy volunteers and in 222 NAFLD patients. Robustness of the PRO-C3 assay was measured according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards and included validation of interference, precision, and reagent stability, whilst sample stability was defined for storage at different temperatures and for 3 freeze-thaw cycles. Fibrosis scoring was based on histological assessments and used as a reference for the diagnostic ability of PRO-C3 to discriminate between patients with different levels of fibrosis. RESULTS: Robustness of the PRO-C3 analysis validated by interference, precision, and reagent stability was found to be within the predefined acceptance criteria. The healthy reference range was determined to be 6.1–14.7 ng/ml. Levels of PRO-C3 were not affected by sex, age, BMI, or ethnicity. Levels of PRO-C3 were able to identify patients with clinically significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis (AUC = 0.83 (95% CI [0.77–0.88], p <0.0001), and AUC = 0.79 (95% CI [0.73–0.85], p <0.0001), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The assay proved to be robust and sample stability was found to comply with hospital sample handling requirements. PRO-C3 measured in samples from patients with NAFLD/NASH was diagnostic for significant and advanced liver fibrosis. LAY SUMMARY: We showed that PRO-C3 levels were stable under conditions conforming with hospital sample-handling requirements. We determined a healthy reference range and showed that PRO-C3 levels were not associated with sex, age, BMI, or ethnicity. Finally, we provide further evidence of an association of PRO-C3 with increasing liver fibrosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8385245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83852452021-08-30 Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis Erhardtsen, Elisabeth Rasmussen, Daniel G.K. Frederiksen, Peder Leeming, Diana Julie Shevell, Diane Gluud, Lise Lotte Karsdal, Morten Asser Aithal, Guruprasad P. Schattenberg, Jörn M. JHEP Rep Research Article BACKGROUND & AIMS: Progressive fibrosis has been identified as the major predictor of mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several biomarkers are currently being evaluated for their ability to substitute the liver biopsy as the reference standard. Recent clinical studies in NAFLD/NASH patients support the utility of PRO-C3, a marker of type III collagen formation, as a marker for the degree of fibrosis, disease activity, and effect of treatment. Here we establish the healthy reference range, optimal sample handling conditions for both short- and long-term serum storage, and robustness for the PRO-C3 assay. METHODS: PRO-C3 was measured in 269 healthy volunteers and in 222 NAFLD patients. Robustness of the PRO-C3 assay was measured according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards and included validation of interference, precision, and reagent stability, whilst sample stability was defined for storage at different temperatures and for 3 freeze-thaw cycles. Fibrosis scoring was based on histological assessments and used as a reference for the diagnostic ability of PRO-C3 to discriminate between patients with different levels of fibrosis. RESULTS: Robustness of the PRO-C3 analysis validated by interference, precision, and reagent stability was found to be within the predefined acceptance criteria. The healthy reference range was determined to be 6.1–14.7 ng/ml. Levels of PRO-C3 were not affected by sex, age, BMI, or ethnicity. Levels of PRO-C3 were able to identify patients with clinically significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis (AUC = 0.83 (95% CI [0.77–0.88], p <0.0001), and AUC = 0.79 (95% CI [0.73–0.85], p <0.0001), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The assay proved to be robust and sample stability was found to comply with hospital sample handling requirements. PRO-C3 measured in samples from patients with NAFLD/NASH was diagnostic for significant and advanced liver fibrosis. LAY SUMMARY: We showed that PRO-C3 levels were stable under conditions conforming with hospital sample-handling requirements. We determined a healthy reference range and showed that PRO-C3 levels were not associated with sex, age, BMI, or ethnicity. Finally, we provide further evidence of an association of PRO-C3 with increasing liver fibrosis. Elsevier 2021-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8385245/ /pubmed/34466796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100317 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Erhardtsen, Elisabeth Rasmussen, Daniel G.K. Frederiksen, Peder Leeming, Diana Julie Shevell, Diane Gluud, Lise Lotte Karsdal, Morten Asser Aithal, Guruprasad P. Schattenberg, Jörn M. Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis |
title | Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis |
title_full | Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis |
title_fullStr | Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis |
title_short | Determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing PRO-C3 – A biomarker of liver fibrosis |
title_sort | determining a healthy reference range and factors potentially influencing pro-c3 – a biomarker of liver fibrosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34466796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erhardtsenelisabeth determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis AT rasmussendanielgk determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis AT frederiksenpeder determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis AT leemingdianajulie determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis AT shevelldiane determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis AT gluudliselotte determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis AT karsdalmortenasser determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis AT aithalguruprasadp determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis AT schattenbergjornm determiningahealthyreferencerangeandfactorspotentiallyinfluencingproc3abiomarkerofliverfibrosis |