Cargando…
(18)F-FDG-Uptake in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Suspected Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Predictor or Confounder?
Introduction: Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a serious disease affecting ~0.4% of prosthetic valve recipients per year. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity for PVE and is included as major criterion for the diagnosis in recent guidelines of the European Society of Cardiolog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.717774 |
_version_ | 1783742136393400320 |
---|---|
author | Hove, Derk ten Sinha, Bhanu Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Gomes, Anna Swart, Laurens E. Tanis, Wilco Budde, Ricardo P. J. Slart, Riemer H. J. A. |
author_facet | Hove, Derk ten Sinha, Bhanu Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Gomes, Anna Swart, Laurens E. Tanis, Wilco Budde, Ricardo P. J. Slart, Riemer H. J. A. |
author_sort | Hove, Derk ten |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a serious disease affecting ~0.4% of prosthetic valve recipients per year. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity for PVE and is included as major criterion for the diagnosis in recent guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. We addressed the question whether increased FDG-uptake in mediastinal lymph nodes could help to support the visual diagnostic assessment of PVE. Methods: In this sub-analysis of a previously published retrospective multicentre study, 160 unique patients were identified who underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for evaluation of suspected PVE. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT was performed in adherence to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine guidelines of 2015 and scans were assessed for signs of mediastinal lymph node activity by 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to clinical context. Clinical diagnosis of PVE had been established based on surgical findings or multidisciplinary consensus after a 1-year follow-up in 80 of 160 patients (50%). Results: In total, 52 patients showed increased mediastinal lymph node activity. Mediastinal lymph node activity on (18)F-FDG-PET/CT did not increase diagnostic accuracy when added to the visual analysis of scans for signs of PVE: X(2): 0.118, p = 0.731). After excluding patients with known confounders for (18)F-FDG-PET/CT, namely use of Bioglue® during prosthetic valve implantation and C-reactive protein levels below 40 mg/L, mediastinal lymph node activity was still not of additional diagnostic value compared to visual analysis alone (X(2):0.129, p = 0.723). Discussion: Assessment of mediastinal lymph node activity did not improve (18)F-FDG-PET/CT diagnostic accuracy for suspected PVE compared to visual assessment of the valve alone, as it seems to be a rather a specific finding, that might be caused by sternal wound or mediastinal infections or even by subclinical respiratory infections. Future studies might elucidate whether increased FDG active lymph nodes indicate a high-risk patient group and whether more detailed assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes could improve their additional diagnostic benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8385671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83856712021-08-26 (18)F-FDG-Uptake in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Suspected Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Predictor or Confounder? Hove, Derk ten Sinha, Bhanu Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Gomes, Anna Swart, Laurens E. Tanis, Wilco Budde, Ricardo P. J. Slart, Riemer H. J. A. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Introduction: Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a serious disease affecting ~0.4% of prosthetic valve recipients per year. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity for PVE and is included as major criterion for the diagnosis in recent guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. We addressed the question whether increased FDG-uptake in mediastinal lymph nodes could help to support the visual diagnostic assessment of PVE. Methods: In this sub-analysis of a previously published retrospective multicentre study, 160 unique patients were identified who underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for evaluation of suspected PVE. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT was performed in adherence to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine guidelines of 2015 and scans were assessed for signs of mediastinal lymph node activity by 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to clinical context. Clinical diagnosis of PVE had been established based on surgical findings or multidisciplinary consensus after a 1-year follow-up in 80 of 160 patients (50%). Results: In total, 52 patients showed increased mediastinal lymph node activity. Mediastinal lymph node activity on (18)F-FDG-PET/CT did not increase diagnostic accuracy when added to the visual analysis of scans for signs of PVE: X(2): 0.118, p = 0.731). After excluding patients with known confounders for (18)F-FDG-PET/CT, namely use of Bioglue® during prosthetic valve implantation and C-reactive protein levels below 40 mg/L, mediastinal lymph node activity was still not of additional diagnostic value compared to visual analysis alone (X(2):0.129, p = 0.723). Discussion: Assessment of mediastinal lymph node activity did not improve (18)F-FDG-PET/CT diagnostic accuracy for suspected PVE compared to visual assessment of the valve alone, as it seems to be a rather a specific finding, that might be caused by sternal wound or mediastinal infections or even by subclinical respiratory infections. Future studies might elucidate whether increased FDG active lymph nodes indicate a high-risk patient group and whether more detailed assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes could improve their additional diagnostic benefit. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8385671/ /pubmed/34458343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.717774 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hove, Sinha, Glaudemans, Gomes, Swart, Tanis, Budde and Slart. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Hove, Derk ten Sinha, Bhanu Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Gomes, Anna Swart, Laurens E. Tanis, Wilco Budde, Ricardo P. J. Slart, Riemer H. J. A. (18)F-FDG-Uptake in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Suspected Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Predictor or Confounder? |
title | (18)F-FDG-Uptake in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Suspected Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Predictor or Confounder? |
title_full | (18)F-FDG-Uptake in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Suspected Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Predictor or Confounder? |
title_fullStr | (18)F-FDG-Uptake in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Suspected Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Predictor or Confounder? |
title_full_unstemmed | (18)F-FDG-Uptake in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Suspected Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Predictor or Confounder? |
title_short | (18)F-FDG-Uptake in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Suspected Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Predictor or Confounder? |
title_sort | (18)f-fdg-uptake in mediastinal lymph nodes in suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis: predictor or confounder? |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.717774 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hovederkten 18ffdguptakeinmediastinallymphnodesinsuspectedprostheticvalveendocarditispredictororconfounder AT sinhabhanu 18ffdguptakeinmediastinallymphnodesinsuspectedprostheticvalveendocarditispredictororconfounder AT glaudemansandorwjm 18ffdguptakeinmediastinallymphnodesinsuspectedprostheticvalveendocarditispredictororconfounder AT gomesanna 18ffdguptakeinmediastinallymphnodesinsuspectedprostheticvalveendocarditispredictororconfounder AT swartlaurense 18ffdguptakeinmediastinallymphnodesinsuspectedprostheticvalveendocarditispredictororconfounder AT taniswilco 18ffdguptakeinmediastinallymphnodesinsuspectedprostheticvalveendocarditispredictororconfounder AT buddericardopj 18ffdguptakeinmediastinallymphnodesinsuspectedprostheticvalveendocarditispredictororconfounder AT slartriemerhja 18ffdguptakeinmediastinallymphnodesinsuspectedprostheticvalveendocarditispredictororconfounder |