Cargando…

Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)

BACKGROUND: The creation of corneal flap is considered to be the most critical part of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Currently, flaps can be created with mechanical micorkeratomes or femtosecond lasers. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare flap characteristics created with two different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmedbegovic-Pjano, Melisa, Biscevic, Alma, Alikadic-Husovic, Amila, Bejdic, Nita, Bohac, Maja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483451
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2021.75.204-208
_version_ 1783742151286325248
author Ahmedbegovic-Pjano, Melisa
Biscevic, Alma
Alikadic-Husovic, Amila
Bejdic, Nita
Bohac, Maja
author_facet Ahmedbegovic-Pjano, Melisa
Biscevic, Alma
Alikadic-Husovic, Amila
Bejdic, Nita
Bohac, Maja
author_sort Ahmedbegovic-Pjano, Melisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The creation of corneal flap is considered to be the most critical part of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Currently, flaps can be created with mechanical micorkeratomes or femtosecond lasers. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare flap characteristics created with two different methods for flap creation in Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: This was a retrospective study. The thickness and morphology of the flap were compared between the two mechanical microkeratomes (group I – Moria M2, group II – Moria SBK One Use Plus) and femtosecond laser (group III – Ziemer Femto LDV). Central flap thickness was measured intraoperatively, while the flap profile was measured with anterior optical coherence tomography at two axes (90° and 180°) and 5 measuring points on the first day, the first week, and one month after the surgery. RESULTS: Central flap thickness was 110.91±15.79 micrometers (µm) (80-164 µm) in group I, 98.08±13.33 µm (65-136 µm) in group II and 103.52±13.89 µm (66-138 µm) in group III. Anterior optical coherence tomography revealed a meniscus-shaped flap in all three groups at both axes (90° and 180°). The least variability in flap thickness was observed in group III (±6 µm). CONCLUSION: All three methods of flap creation provide good shape and thickness reproducibility. Ziemer Femto LDV femtosecond laser had the least variable flap thickness in a single flap. Mechanical microkeratomes had slightly lower performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8385742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83857422021-09-02 Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Ahmedbegovic-Pjano, Melisa Biscevic, Alma Alikadic-Husovic, Amila Bejdic, Nita Bohac, Maja Med Arch Original Paper BACKGROUND: The creation of corneal flap is considered to be the most critical part of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Currently, flaps can be created with mechanical micorkeratomes or femtosecond lasers. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare flap characteristics created with two different methods for flap creation in Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: This was a retrospective study. The thickness and morphology of the flap were compared between the two mechanical microkeratomes (group I – Moria M2, group II – Moria SBK One Use Plus) and femtosecond laser (group III – Ziemer Femto LDV). Central flap thickness was measured intraoperatively, while the flap profile was measured with anterior optical coherence tomography at two axes (90° and 180°) and 5 measuring points on the first day, the first week, and one month after the surgery. RESULTS: Central flap thickness was 110.91±15.79 micrometers (µm) (80-164 µm) in group I, 98.08±13.33 µm (65-136 µm) in group II and 103.52±13.89 µm (66-138 µm) in group III. Anterior optical coherence tomography revealed a meniscus-shaped flap in all three groups at both axes (90° and 180°). The least variability in flap thickness was observed in group III (±6 µm). CONCLUSION: All three methods of flap creation provide good shape and thickness reproducibility. Ziemer Femto LDV femtosecond laser had the least variable flap thickness in a single flap. Mechanical microkeratomes had slightly lower performance. Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8385742/ /pubmed/34483451 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2021.75.204-208 Text en © 2021 Melisa Ahmedbegovic-Pjano, Alma Biscevic,, Amila Alikadic-Husovic, Nita Bejdic, Maja Bohac https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ahmedbegovic-Pjano, Melisa
Biscevic, Alma
Alikadic-Husovic, Amila
Bejdic, Nita
Bohac, Maja
Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_full Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_fullStr Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_short Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_sort comparison of flap characteristics created with two different methods in laser in situ keratomileusis (lasik)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483451
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2021.75.204-208
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedbegovicpjanomelisa comparisonofflapcharacteristicscreatedwithtwodifferentmethodsinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT biscevicalma comparisonofflapcharacteristicscreatedwithtwodifferentmethodsinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT alikadichusovicamila comparisonofflapcharacteristicscreatedwithtwodifferentmethodsinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT bejdicnita comparisonofflapcharacteristicscreatedwithtwodifferentmethodsinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT bohacmaja comparisonofflapcharacteristicscreatedwithtwodifferentmethodsinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasik