Cargando…
COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has exposed long-standing fragmentation in health systems strengthening efforts for health security and universal health coverage while these objectives are largely interdependent and complementary. In this prevailing background, we reviewed countries’ COVID-19 Prepare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab089 |
_version_ | 1783742165390721024 |
---|---|
author | Mustafa, Saqif Zhang, Yu Zibwowa, Zandile Seifeldin, Redda Ako-Egbe, Louis McDarby, Geraldine Kelley, Edward Saikat, Sohel |
author_facet | Mustafa, Saqif Zhang, Yu Zibwowa, Zandile Seifeldin, Redda Ako-Egbe, Louis McDarby, Geraldine Kelley, Edward Saikat, Sohel |
author_sort | Mustafa, Saqif |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has exposed long-standing fragmentation in health systems strengthening efforts for health security and universal health coverage while these objectives are largely interdependent and complementary. In this prevailing background, we reviewed countries’ COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans (CPRPs) to assess the extent of integration of non-COVID-19 essential health service continuity considerations alongside emergency response activities. We searched for COVID-19 planning documents from governments and ministries of health, World Health Organization (WHO) country offices and United Nations (UN) country teams. We developed document review protocols using global guidance from the WHO and UN and the health systems resilience literature. After screening, we analysed 154 CPRPs from 106 countries. The majority of plans had a high degree of alignment with pillars of emergency response such as surveillance (99%), laboratory systems (96%) and COVID-19-specific case management (97%). Less than half considered maintaining essential health services (47%); 41% designated a mechanism for health system–wide participation in emergency planning; 34% considered subnational service delivery; 95% contained infection prevention and control (IPC) activities and 29% considered quality of care; and 24% were budgeted for and 7% contained monitoring and evaluation of essential health services. To improve, ongoing and future emergency planning should proactively include proportionate activities, resources and monitoring for essential health services to reduce excess mortality and morbidity. Specifically, this entails strengthening subnational health services with local stakeholder engagement in planning; ensuring a dedicated focus in emergency operations structures to maintain health systems resilience for non-emergency health services; considering all domains of quality in health services along with IPC; and building resilient monitoring capacity for timely and reliable tracking of health systems functionality including service utilization and health outcomes. An integrated approach to planning should be pursued as health systems recover from COVID-19 disruptions and take actions to build back better. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8385840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83858402021-09-01 COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective Mustafa, Saqif Zhang, Yu Zibwowa, Zandile Seifeldin, Redda Ako-Egbe, Louis McDarby, Geraldine Kelley, Edward Saikat, Sohel Health Policy Plan Original Article Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has exposed long-standing fragmentation in health systems strengthening efforts for health security and universal health coverage while these objectives are largely interdependent and complementary. In this prevailing background, we reviewed countries’ COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans (CPRPs) to assess the extent of integration of non-COVID-19 essential health service continuity considerations alongside emergency response activities. We searched for COVID-19 planning documents from governments and ministries of health, World Health Organization (WHO) country offices and United Nations (UN) country teams. We developed document review protocols using global guidance from the WHO and UN and the health systems resilience literature. After screening, we analysed 154 CPRPs from 106 countries. The majority of plans had a high degree of alignment with pillars of emergency response such as surveillance (99%), laboratory systems (96%) and COVID-19-specific case management (97%). Less than half considered maintaining essential health services (47%); 41% designated a mechanism for health system–wide participation in emergency planning; 34% considered subnational service delivery; 95% contained infection prevention and control (IPC) activities and 29% considered quality of care; and 24% were budgeted for and 7% contained monitoring and evaluation of essential health services. To improve, ongoing and future emergency planning should proactively include proportionate activities, resources and monitoring for essential health services to reduce excess mortality and morbidity. Specifically, this entails strengthening subnational health services with local stakeholder engagement in planning; ensuring a dedicated focus in emergency operations structures to maintain health systems resilience for non-emergency health services; considering all domains of quality in health services along with IPC; and building resilient monitoring capacity for timely and reliable tracking of health systems functionality including service utilization and health outcomes. An integrated approach to planning should be pursued as health systems recover from COVID-19 disruptions and take actions to build back better. Oxford University Press 2021-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8385840/ /pubmed/34331439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab089 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mustafa, Saqif Zhang, Yu Zibwowa, Zandile Seifeldin, Redda Ako-Egbe, Louis McDarby, Geraldine Kelley, Edward Saikat, Sohel COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective |
title | COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective |
title_full | COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective |
title_short | COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective |
title_sort | covid-19 preparedness and response plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mustafasaqif covid19preparednessandresponseplansfrom106countriesareviewfromahealthsystemsresilienceperspective AT zhangyu covid19preparednessandresponseplansfrom106countriesareviewfromahealthsystemsresilienceperspective AT zibwowazandile covid19preparednessandresponseplansfrom106countriesareviewfromahealthsystemsresilienceperspective AT seifeldinredda covid19preparednessandresponseplansfrom106countriesareviewfromahealthsystemsresilienceperspective AT akoegbelouis covid19preparednessandresponseplansfrom106countriesareviewfromahealthsystemsresilienceperspective AT mcdarbygeraldine covid19preparednessandresponseplansfrom106countriesareviewfromahealthsystemsresilienceperspective AT kelleyedward covid19preparednessandresponseplansfrom106countriesareviewfromahealthsystemsresilienceperspective AT saikatsohel covid19preparednessandresponseplansfrom106countriesareviewfromahealthsystemsresilienceperspective |