Cargando…
Does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients?
BACKGROUND: Continuity of care by the same personal physician is a key factor in an effective and efficient health care system. Studies that support the association between high adherence and better outcomes were done in settings where allocation to the same physician was a long-term policy. OBJECTI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34433499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-021-00475-9 |
_version_ | 1783742204298133504 |
---|---|
author | Golan-Cohen, A. Blumberg, G. Merzon, E. Kitai, E. Fogelman, Y. Shipotovsky, A. Vinker, S. |
author_facet | Golan-Cohen, A. Blumberg, G. Merzon, E. Kitai, E. Fogelman, Y. Shipotovsky, A. Vinker, S. |
author_sort | Golan-Cohen, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Continuity of care by the same personal physician is a key factor in an effective and efficient health care system. Studies that support the association between high adherence and better outcomes were done in settings where allocation to the same physician was a long-term policy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence that changing organizational policy from the free choice of a primary care physician to a mandatory continuity of care by the same physician has on adherence to a personal physician. METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on electronic databases; comparison of adherence and demographic characteristics (sex, age, and socio-economic status) of 208,286 Leumit enrollees who met the inclusion criteria, according to change in the adherence to a personal physician. To evaluate adherence, we used the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) index, which measures the number of visits made to the personal doctor out of the total primary care physician visits over the same period. The patients were divided into groups according to their UPC level. RESULTS: The data shows that 54.5% of the patients were high adherers even before the organizational change; these rates are similar to those published by various organizations worldwide, years after mandating continuity of care by the same physician. In the year following the intervention, only 34.5% of the patients changed the level of their adherence group. Of these, 64% made a shift to a higher adherence group. Before the intervention, the high adherers were older (mean age 57.8 vs. 49.3 years in the low adherers group) and from a higher SES (mean SES status 9.32 vs. 8.71). After the intervention, a higher proportion of older patients and patients from a higher SES changed their adherence to a higher group. Sex distribution was similar over all the adherence level groups and did not change after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS: A policy change that encouraged adherence to an allocated primary care physician managed to improve adherence only in specific groups. Health organizations need to examine the potential for change and the groups they want to influence and direct their investment wisely. TRIAL REGISTRATION: retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8386125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83861252021-08-27 Does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients? Golan-Cohen, A. Blumberg, G. Merzon, E. Kitai, E. Fogelman, Y. Shipotovsky, A. Vinker, S. Isr J Health Policy Res Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Continuity of care by the same personal physician is a key factor in an effective and efficient health care system. Studies that support the association between high adherence and better outcomes were done in settings where allocation to the same physician was a long-term policy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence that changing organizational policy from the free choice of a primary care physician to a mandatory continuity of care by the same physician has on adherence to a personal physician. METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on electronic databases; comparison of adherence and demographic characteristics (sex, age, and socio-economic status) of 208,286 Leumit enrollees who met the inclusion criteria, according to change in the adherence to a personal physician. To evaluate adherence, we used the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) index, which measures the number of visits made to the personal doctor out of the total primary care physician visits over the same period. The patients were divided into groups according to their UPC level. RESULTS: The data shows that 54.5% of the patients were high adherers even before the organizational change; these rates are similar to those published by various organizations worldwide, years after mandating continuity of care by the same physician. In the year following the intervention, only 34.5% of the patients changed the level of their adherence group. Of these, 64% made a shift to a higher adherence group. Before the intervention, the high adherers were older (mean age 57.8 vs. 49.3 years in the low adherers group) and from a higher SES (mean SES status 9.32 vs. 8.71). After the intervention, a higher proportion of older patients and patients from a higher SES changed their adherence to a higher group. Sex distribution was similar over all the adherence level groups and did not change after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS: A policy change that encouraged adherence to an allocated primary care physician managed to improve adherence only in specific groups. Health organizations need to examine the potential for change and the groups they want to influence and direct their investment wisely. TRIAL REGISTRATION: retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8386125/ /pubmed/34433499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-021-00475-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Golan-Cohen, A. Blumberg, G. Merzon, E. Kitai, E. Fogelman, Y. Shipotovsky, A. Vinker, S. Does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients? |
title | Does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients? |
title_full | Does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients? |
title_fullStr | Does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients? |
title_short | Does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients? |
title_sort | does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients? |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34433499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-021-00475-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT golancohena doesapolicythatrequiresadherencetoaregularprimarycarephysicianimprovetheactualadherenceofpatients AT blumbergg doesapolicythatrequiresadherencetoaregularprimarycarephysicianimprovetheactualadherenceofpatients AT merzone doesapolicythatrequiresadherencetoaregularprimarycarephysicianimprovetheactualadherenceofpatients AT kitaie doesapolicythatrequiresadherencetoaregularprimarycarephysicianimprovetheactualadherenceofpatients AT fogelmany doesapolicythatrequiresadherencetoaregularprimarycarephysicianimprovetheactualadherenceofpatients AT shipotovskya doesapolicythatrequiresadherencetoaregularprimarycarephysicianimprovetheactualadherenceofpatients AT vinkers doesapolicythatrequiresadherencetoaregularprimarycarephysicianimprovetheactualadherenceofpatients |