Cargando…

Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Complex organisational arrangements are required to deliver antenatal and newborn screening programmes. Decision-makers consider the benefits and harms of screening when reviewing the evidence about these programmes. Economic evaluations contribute one important part of this assessment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Png, May Ee, Yang, Miaoqing, Roberts, Nia, Taylor-Phillips, Sian, Rivero-Arias, Oliver, Petrou, Stavros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048031
_version_ 1783742216549695488
author Png, May Ee
Yang, Miaoqing
Roberts, Nia
Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Rivero-Arias, Oliver
Petrou, Stavros
author_facet Png, May Ee
Yang, Miaoqing
Roberts, Nia
Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Rivero-Arias, Oliver
Petrou, Stavros
author_sort Png, May Ee
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Complex organisational arrangements are required to deliver antenatal and newborn screening programmes. Decision-makers consider the benefits and harms of screening when reviewing the evidence about these programmes. Economic evaluations contribute one important part of this assessment process. However, it is not fully understood what approaches health economic assessments have adopted to measure and value benefits and harms. This study aims to systematically review and critique the published and grey literature on methods for identifying, measuring and valuing the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening adopted by health economic assessments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Nine bibliographic databases will be searched from 2000 onwards. These search strategies will be supplemented by manual reference searching of bibliographies, forward citation searching, contacts with experts, author searching and web searching for grey literature. Studies will be selected for review if they report health economic assessments of an antenatal or newborn screening programme. Assessments of title and abstracts and full reports will be undertaken independently with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extraction will include fields to assess the reporting quality of the studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement and a bespoke ancillary form to assess how benefits and harms have been accounted for. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is an evidence synthesis review from already published materials and hence ethics committee approval or written informed consent will not be required. Our results will be disseminated by publishing in high-impact peer-review journals and presenting at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020165236.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8386210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83862102021-09-09 Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review Png, May Ee Yang, Miaoqing Roberts, Nia Taylor-Phillips, Sian Rivero-Arias, Oliver Petrou, Stavros BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Complex organisational arrangements are required to deliver antenatal and newborn screening programmes. Decision-makers consider the benefits and harms of screening when reviewing the evidence about these programmes. Economic evaluations contribute one important part of this assessment process. However, it is not fully understood what approaches health economic assessments have adopted to measure and value benefits and harms. This study aims to systematically review and critique the published and grey literature on methods for identifying, measuring and valuing the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening adopted by health economic assessments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Nine bibliographic databases will be searched from 2000 onwards. These search strategies will be supplemented by manual reference searching of bibliographies, forward citation searching, contacts with experts, author searching and web searching for grey literature. Studies will be selected for review if they report health economic assessments of an antenatal or newborn screening programme. Assessments of title and abstracts and full reports will be undertaken independently with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extraction will include fields to assess the reporting quality of the studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement and a bespoke ancillary form to assess how benefits and harms have been accounted for. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is an evidence synthesis review from already published materials and hence ethics committee approval or written informed consent will not be required. Our results will be disseminated by publishing in high-impact peer-review journals and presenting at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020165236. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8386210/ /pubmed/34429311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048031 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economics
Png, May Ee
Yang, Miaoqing
Roberts, Nia
Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Rivero-Arias, Oliver
Petrou, Stavros
Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review
title Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048031
work_keys_str_mv AT pngmayee methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT yangmiaoqing methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT robertsnia methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT taylorphillipssian methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT riveroariasoliver methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT petroustavros methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview