Cargando…
Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Complex organisational arrangements are required to deliver antenatal and newborn screening programmes. Decision-makers consider the benefits and harms of screening when reviewing the evidence about these programmes. Economic evaluations contribute one important part of this assessment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048031 |
_version_ | 1783742216549695488 |
---|---|
author | Png, May Ee Yang, Miaoqing Roberts, Nia Taylor-Phillips, Sian Rivero-Arias, Oliver Petrou, Stavros |
author_facet | Png, May Ee Yang, Miaoqing Roberts, Nia Taylor-Phillips, Sian Rivero-Arias, Oliver Petrou, Stavros |
author_sort | Png, May Ee |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Complex organisational arrangements are required to deliver antenatal and newborn screening programmes. Decision-makers consider the benefits and harms of screening when reviewing the evidence about these programmes. Economic evaluations contribute one important part of this assessment process. However, it is not fully understood what approaches health economic assessments have adopted to measure and value benefits and harms. This study aims to systematically review and critique the published and grey literature on methods for identifying, measuring and valuing the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening adopted by health economic assessments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Nine bibliographic databases will be searched from 2000 onwards. These search strategies will be supplemented by manual reference searching of bibliographies, forward citation searching, contacts with experts, author searching and web searching for grey literature. Studies will be selected for review if they report health economic assessments of an antenatal or newborn screening programme. Assessments of title and abstracts and full reports will be undertaken independently with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extraction will include fields to assess the reporting quality of the studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement and a bespoke ancillary form to assess how benefits and harms have been accounted for. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is an evidence synthesis review from already published materials and hence ethics committee approval or written informed consent will not be required. Our results will be disseminated by publishing in high-impact peer-review journals and presenting at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020165236. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8386210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83862102021-09-09 Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review Png, May Ee Yang, Miaoqing Roberts, Nia Taylor-Phillips, Sian Rivero-Arias, Oliver Petrou, Stavros BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Complex organisational arrangements are required to deliver antenatal and newborn screening programmes. Decision-makers consider the benefits and harms of screening when reviewing the evidence about these programmes. Economic evaluations contribute one important part of this assessment process. However, it is not fully understood what approaches health economic assessments have adopted to measure and value benefits and harms. This study aims to systematically review and critique the published and grey literature on methods for identifying, measuring and valuing the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening adopted by health economic assessments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Nine bibliographic databases will be searched from 2000 onwards. These search strategies will be supplemented by manual reference searching of bibliographies, forward citation searching, contacts with experts, author searching and web searching for grey literature. Studies will be selected for review if they report health economic assessments of an antenatal or newborn screening programme. Assessments of title and abstracts and full reports will be undertaken independently with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extraction will include fields to assess the reporting quality of the studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement and a bespoke ancillary form to assess how benefits and harms have been accounted for. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is an evidence synthesis review from already published materials and hence ethics committee approval or written informed consent will not be required. Our results will be disseminated by publishing in high-impact peer-review journals and presenting at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020165236. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8386210/ /pubmed/34429311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048031 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Png, May Ee Yang, Miaoqing Roberts, Nia Taylor-Phillips, Sian Rivero-Arias, Oliver Petrou, Stavros Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review |
title | Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pngmayee methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview AT yangmiaoqing methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview AT robertsnia methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview AT taylorphillipssian methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview AT riveroariasoliver methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview AT petroustavros methodsforevaluatingthebenefitsandharmsofantenatalandnewbornscreeningprogrammesadoptedbyhealtheconomicassessmentsprotocolforasystematicreview |