Cargando…

A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars

INTRODUCTION: Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist. It is conventionally used as a sedative in the intensive care unit. However, recently, the application of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to a local anesthetic agent has been studied. The present study intends to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nalawade, Shubhada Harishchandra, Nilesh, Kumar, Kumar, C. D. Mounesh, Punde, Prashant A, Patil, Pankaj B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483586
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_7_20
_version_ 1783742225030578176
author Nalawade, Shubhada Harishchandra
Nilesh, Kumar
Kumar, C. D. Mounesh
Punde, Prashant A
Patil, Pankaj B
author_facet Nalawade, Shubhada Harishchandra
Nilesh, Kumar
Kumar, C. D. Mounesh
Punde, Prashant A
Patil, Pankaj B
author_sort Nalawade, Shubhada Harishchandra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist. It is conventionally used as a sedative in the intensive care unit. However, recently, the application of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to a local anesthetic agent has been studied. The present study intends to evaluate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine with 2% plain lignocaine with 2% lignocaine and 1:200000 adrenaline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients who required surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar extraction were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using a computer-generated table. Patients in the study group received 2% plain lignocaine with 1 mcg/ml dexmedetomidine. Patients in the control group received 2% lignocaine with 1:200000 adrenaline. The parameters evaluated were onset and duration of action, pulse rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and blood loss. RESULTS: Onset of action was faster and the duration of action was longer when dexmedetomidine was used with lignocaine as a local anesthetic agent. The vital parameters in both the groups were stable. Bleeding at the surgical site was less in the dexmedetomidine group. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that the combination of dexmedetomidine with lignocaine enhances the local anesthetic potency of lignocaine when injected for nerve blocks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8386254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83862542021-09-03 A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars Nalawade, Shubhada Harishchandra Nilesh, Kumar Kumar, C. D. Mounesh Punde, Prashant A Patil, Pankaj B Natl J Maxillofac Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist. It is conventionally used as a sedative in the intensive care unit. However, recently, the application of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to a local anesthetic agent has been studied. The present study intends to evaluate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine with 2% plain lignocaine with 2% lignocaine and 1:200000 adrenaline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients who required surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar extraction were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using a computer-generated table. Patients in the study group received 2% plain lignocaine with 1 mcg/ml dexmedetomidine. Patients in the control group received 2% lignocaine with 1:200000 adrenaline. The parameters evaluated were onset and duration of action, pulse rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and blood loss. RESULTS: Onset of action was faster and the duration of action was longer when dexmedetomidine was used with lignocaine as a local anesthetic agent. The vital parameters in both the groups were stable. Bleeding at the surgical site was less in the dexmedetomidine group. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that the combination of dexmedetomidine with lignocaine enhances the local anesthetic potency of lignocaine when injected for nerve blocks. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8386254/ /pubmed/34483586 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_7_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nalawade, Shubhada Harishchandra
Nilesh, Kumar
Kumar, C. D. Mounesh
Punde, Prashant A
Patil, Pankaj B
A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars
title A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars
title_full A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars
title_fullStr A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars
title_full_unstemmed A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars
title_short A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars
title_sort clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483586
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_7_20
work_keys_str_mv AT nalawadeshubhadaharishchandra aclinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars
AT nileshkumar aclinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars
AT kumarcdmounesh aclinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars
AT pundeprashanta aclinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars
AT patilpankajb aclinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars
AT nalawadeshubhadaharishchandra clinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars
AT nileshkumar clinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars
AT kumarcdmounesh clinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars
AT pundeprashanta clinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars
AT patilpankajb clinicalcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineasanadjuvantto2plainlignocaineand2lignocainewith1200000adrenalineaslocalanestheticagentsforsurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolars