Cargando…

A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to evaluate the effect of osteotomies with and without Pterygomaxillary disjunction (PMD) during Surgical Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion on the displacement pattern and stress distribution of Dental and Skeletal structures of the Nasomaxillary (NM) complex by a modif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sankar, Singaraju Gowri, Prashanth, Bathini, Rajasekhar, Galli, Prasad, Mandava, Reddy, Ganugapantae Vivek, Priyanka, J. S. Yamini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483573
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_28_20
_version_ 1783742226014142464
author Sankar, Singaraju Gowri
Prashanth, Bathini
Rajasekhar, Galli
Prasad, Mandava
Reddy, Ganugapantae Vivek
Priyanka, J. S. Yamini
author_facet Sankar, Singaraju Gowri
Prashanth, Bathini
Rajasekhar, Galli
Prasad, Mandava
Reddy, Ganugapantae Vivek
Priyanka, J. S. Yamini
author_sort Sankar, Singaraju Gowri
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The study aims to evaluate the effect of osteotomies with and without Pterygomaxillary disjunction (PMD) during Surgical Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion on the displacement pattern and stress distribution of Dental and Skeletal structures of the Nasomaxillary (NM) complex by a modified rapid maxillary expansion (RME) Hybrid appliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CT scan of a 20-year-old adult with maxillary constriction and the posterior bite was utilized for the restructuring of the finite element model. Five different meshed models were created individually with varying procedures of the osteotomy. A posteriorly anchored Hybrid-Hyrax appliance was utilized for RME. Groups included Group 0 - Control group without osteotomy; Group I - Only Midpalatal osteotomy; Group II - Only Subtotal Le fort I; Group III - Both Midpalatal and Subtotal Le fort I without PMD; Group IV - Midpalatal + subtotal Le fort I with bilateral PMD. The displacement pattern and stress distribution in all three dimensions were recorded and analyzed using analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: Group IV with PMD exhibited the highest stress dissipation and displacement of the skeletal and dental structures followed by Group III osteotomies. The highest stress concentration was at midpalatal suture (292 MPa) for Group III osteotomies. There is no statistical difference between Group III and Group IV osteotomies for many of the parameters measured (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Posteriorly anchored Hybrid appliance without PMD is as effective as that with of PMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8386258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83862582021-09-03 A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study Sankar, Singaraju Gowri Prashanth, Bathini Rajasekhar, Galli Prasad, Mandava Reddy, Ganugapantae Vivek Priyanka, J. S. Yamini Natl J Maxillofac Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: The study aims to evaluate the effect of osteotomies with and without Pterygomaxillary disjunction (PMD) during Surgical Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion on the displacement pattern and stress distribution of Dental and Skeletal structures of the Nasomaxillary (NM) complex by a modified rapid maxillary expansion (RME) Hybrid appliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CT scan of a 20-year-old adult with maxillary constriction and the posterior bite was utilized for the restructuring of the finite element model. Five different meshed models were created individually with varying procedures of the osteotomy. A posteriorly anchored Hybrid-Hyrax appliance was utilized for RME. Groups included Group 0 - Control group without osteotomy; Group I - Only Midpalatal osteotomy; Group II - Only Subtotal Le fort I; Group III - Both Midpalatal and Subtotal Le fort I without PMD; Group IV - Midpalatal + subtotal Le fort I with bilateral PMD. The displacement pattern and stress distribution in all three dimensions were recorded and analyzed using analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: Group IV with PMD exhibited the highest stress dissipation and displacement of the skeletal and dental structures followed by Group III osteotomies. The highest stress concentration was at midpalatal suture (292 MPa) for Group III osteotomies. There is no statistical difference between Group III and Group IV osteotomies for many of the parameters measured (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Posteriorly anchored Hybrid appliance without PMD is as effective as that with of PMD. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8386258/ /pubmed/34483573 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_28_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sankar, Singaraju Gowri
Prashanth, Bathini
Rajasekhar, Galli
Prasad, Mandava
Reddy, Ganugapantae Vivek
Priyanka, J. S. Yamini
A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study
title A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study
title_full A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study
title_fullStr A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study
title_short A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study
title_sort comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: a finite element study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483573
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_28_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sankarsingarajugowri acomparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT prashanthbathini acomparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT rajasekhargalli acomparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT prasadmandava acomparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT reddyganugapantaevivek acomparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT priyankajsyamini acomparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT sankarsingarajugowri comparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT prashanthbathini comparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT rajasekhargalli comparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT prasadmandava comparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT reddyganugapantaevivek comparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy
AT priyankajsyamini comparisonofdifferentosteotomytechniqueswithandwithoutpterygomaxillarydisjunctioninsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionutilizingmodifiedhybridrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicewithposteriorimplantsafiniteelementstudy