Cargando…

Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children

Introduction: In pediatric patients, esophageal perforation (EP) is rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates of up to 20–30%. In addition to standard treatment options, endoscopic esophageal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) therapy has shown promising results, especially in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritz, Laura Antonia, Hajji, Mohammad Samer, Schwerd, Tobias, Koletzko, Sibylle, von Schweinitz, Dietrich, Lurz, Eberhard, Hubertus, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.727472
_version_ 1783742232087494656
author Ritz, Laura Antonia
Hajji, Mohammad Samer
Schwerd, Tobias
Koletzko, Sibylle
von Schweinitz, Dietrich
Lurz, Eberhard
Hubertus, Jochen
author_facet Ritz, Laura Antonia
Hajji, Mohammad Samer
Schwerd, Tobias
Koletzko, Sibylle
von Schweinitz, Dietrich
Lurz, Eberhard
Hubertus, Jochen
author_sort Ritz, Laura Antonia
collection PubMed
description Introduction: In pediatric patients, esophageal perforation (EP) is rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates of up to 20–30%. In addition to standard treatment options, endoscopic esophageal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) therapy has shown promising results, especially in adult patients. Thus far, the only data on technical success and effectiveness of EVAC in pediatric patients were published in 2018 by Manfredi et al. at Boston Children's Hospital. The sparse data on EVAC in children indicates that this promising technique has been barely utilized in pediatric patients. More data are needed to evaluate efficacy and outcomes of this technique in pediatric patients. Method: We reviewed five cases of therapy using EVAC, ArgyleTM Replogle Suction Catheter (RSC), or both on pediatric patients with EP in our institution between October 2018 and April 2020. Results: Five patients with EP (median 3.4 years; 2 males) were treated with EVAC, RSC, or a combination. Complete closure of EP was not achieved after EVAC alone, though patients' health stabilized and inflammation and size of EP decreased after EVAC. Four patients then were treated with RSC until the EP healed. One patient needed surgery as the recurrent fistula did not heal sufficiently after 3 weeks of EVAC therapy. Two patients developed stenosis and were successfully treated with dilatations. One patient treated with RSC alone showed persistent EP after 5 weeks. Conclusion: EVAC in pediatric patients is technically feasible and a promising method to treat EP, regardless of the underlying cause. EVAC therapy can be terminated as soon as local inflammation and C-reactive protein levels decrease, even if the mucosa is not healed completely at that time. A promising subsequent treatment is RSC. An earlier switch to RSC can substantially reduce the need of anesthesia during subsequent treatments. Our findings indicate that EVAC is more effective than RSC alone. In some cases, EVAC can be used to improve the tissues condition in preparation for a re-do surgery. At 1 year after therapy, all but one patient demonstrated sufficient weight gain. Further prospective studies with a larger cohort are required to confirm our observations from this small case series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8386293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83862932021-08-26 Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children Ritz, Laura Antonia Hajji, Mohammad Samer Schwerd, Tobias Koletzko, Sibylle von Schweinitz, Dietrich Lurz, Eberhard Hubertus, Jochen Front Pediatr Pediatrics Introduction: In pediatric patients, esophageal perforation (EP) is rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates of up to 20–30%. In addition to standard treatment options, endoscopic esophageal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) therapy has shown promising results, especially in adult patients. Thus far, the only data on technical success and effectiveness of EVAC in pediatric patients were published in 2018 by Manfredi et al. at Boston Children's Hospital. The sparse data on EVAC in children indicates that this promising technique has been barely utilized in pediatric patients. More data are needed to evaluate efficacy and outcomes of this technique in pediatric patients. Method: We reviewed five cases of therapy using EVAC, ArgyleTM Replogle Suction Catheter (RSC), or both on pediatric patients with EP in our institution between October 2018 and April 2020. Results: Five patients with EP (median 3.4 years; 2 males) were treated with EVAC, RSC, or a combination. Complete closure of EP was not achieved after EVAC alone, though patients' health stabilized and inflammation and size of EP decreased after EVAC. Four patients then were treated with RSC until the EP healed. One patient needed surgery as the recurrent fistula did not heal sufficiently after 3 weeks of EVAC therapy. Two patients developed stenosis and were successfully treated with dilatations. One patient treated with RSC alone showed persistent EP after 5 weeks. Conclusion: EVAC in pediatric patients is technically feasible and a promising method to treat EP, regardless of the underlying cause. EVAC therapy can be terminated as soon as local inflammation and C-reactive protein levels decrease, even if the mucosa is not healed completely at that time. A promising subsequent treatment is RSC. An earlier switch to RSC can substantially reduce the need of anesthesia during subsequent treatments. Our findings indicate that EVAC is more effective than RSC alone. In some cases, EVAC can be used to improve the tissues condition in preparation for a re-do surgery. At 1 year after therapy, all but one patient demonstrated sufficient weight gain. Further prospective studies with a larger cohort are required to confirm our observations from this small case series. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8386293/ /pubmed/34458215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.727472 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ritz, Hajji, Schwerd, Koletzko, von Schweinitz, Lurz and Hubertus. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Ritz, Laura Antonia
Hajji, Mohammad Samer
Schwerd, Tobias
Koletzko, Sibylle
von Schweinitz, Dietrich
Lurz, Eberhard
Hubertus, Jochen
Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children
title Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children
title_full Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children
title_fullStr Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children
title_full_unstemmed Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children
title_short Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children
title_sort esophageal perforation and evac in pediatric patients: a case series of four children
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.727472
work_keys_str_mv AT ritzlauraantonia esophagealperforationandevacinpediatricpatientsacaseseriesoffourchildren
AT hajjimohammadsamer esophagealperforationandevacinpediatricpatientsacaseseriesoffourchildren
AT schwerdtobias esophagealperforationandevacinpediatricpatientsacaseseriesoffourchildren
AT koletzkosibylle esophagealperforationandevacinpediatricpatientsacaseseriesoffourchildren
AT vonschweinitzdietrich esophagealperforationandevacinpediatricpatientsacaseseriesoffourchildren
AT lurzeberhard esophagealperforationandevacinpediatricpatientsacaseseriesoffourchildren
AT hubertusjochen esophagealperforationandevacinpediatricpatientsacaseseriesoffourchildren