Cargando…
Using Different Cutoffs to Define Tinnitus and Assess Its Prevalence—A Survey in the Dutch General Population
Introduction: Tinnitus prevalence numbers in the literature range between 5 and 43%, depending on the studied population and definition. It is unclear when tinnitus becomes pathologic. Objectives: To assess the tinnitus prevalence in the Dutch general population with different cutoffs for definition...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34456849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.690192 |
_version_ | 1783742243066085376 |
---|---|
author | Rademaker, Maaike M. Smit, Adriana L. Brabers, Anne E. M. de Jong, Judith D. Stokroos, Robert J. Stegeman, Inge |
author_facet | Rademaker, Maaike M. Smit, Adriana L. Brabers, Anne E. M. de Jong, Judith D. Stokroos, Robert J. Stegeman, Inge |
author_sort | Rademaker, Maaike M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Tinnitus prevalence numbers in the literature range between 5 and 43%, depending on the studied population and definition. It is unclear when tinnitus becomes pathologic. Objectives: To assess the tinnitus prevalence in the Dutch general population with different cutoffs for definition. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was sent to a sample (n = 2,251) of the Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel. Three questions were asked to assess the presence of tinnitus, duration, and frequency of the complaint. We classified people as having pathologic tinnitus when participants experienced it for 5–60 min (daily or almost daily or weekly), or tinnitus for >60 min or continuously (daily or almost daily or weekly or monthly), so tinnitus impact on daily life was measured with the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and a single-item question. Answers were stratified to mid-decade years of age. Prevalence numbers were weighted by gender and age to match the Dutch population. Results: Nine hundred thirty-two of 2,251 participants (41%) filled out the questionnaire. The median age was 67.0 (IQR 17) years. Three hundred thirty-eight of 932 (36%) experienced tinnitus for an undefined amount of time during the last year. Two hundred sixteen of 932 (23%) met our definition of having pathologic tinnitus (21% when weighted for age and gender). The median TFI score for all pathologic tinnitus participants was 16.6 (IQR 21.8). A percentage of 50.4% of the pathologic tinnitus participants had a TFI in the range 0–17, which can be interpreted as not a problem. Conclusion: Twenty-three percent (unweighted) or 21% (weighted) of our sample met our definition of pathologic tinnitus, which was based on a combination of duration and frequency over the last year. The TFI score of 47.7% of the pathologic tinnitus participants is ≥18. This indicates that they consider the tinnitus to be at least “a small problem” [11.1% (unweighted) or 8.9% (weighted) of the total study group]. This study illustrates the difficulties with defining pathologic tinnitus. In addition, it demonstrates that tinnitus prevalence numbers vary with different definitions and, consequently, stresses the importance of using a uniform definition of tinnitus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8386349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83863492021-08-26 Using Different Cutoffs to Define Tinnitus and Assess Its Prevalence—A Survey in the Dutch General Population Rademaker, Maaike M. Smit, Adriana L. Brabers, Anne E. M. de Jong, Judith D. Stokroos, Robert J. Stegeman, Inge Front Neurol Neurology Introduction: Tinnitus prevalence numbers in the literature range between 5 and 43%, depending on the studied population and definition. It is unclear when tinnitus becomes pathologic. Objectives: To assess the tinnitus prevalence in the Dutch general population with different cutoffs for definition. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was sent to a sample (n = 2,251) of the Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel. Three questions were asked to assess the presence of tinnitus, duration, and frequency of the complaint. We classified people as having pathologic tinnitus when participants experienced it for 5–60 min (daily or almost daily or weekly), or tinnitus for >60 min or continuously (daily or almost daily or weekly or monthly), so tinnitus impact on daily life was measured with the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and a single-item question. Answers were stratified to mid-decade years of age. Prevalence numbers were weighted by gender and age to match the Dutch population. Results: Nine hundred thirty-two of 2,251 participants (41%) filled out the questionnaire. The median age was 67.0 (IQR 17) years. Three hundred thirty-eight of 932 (36%) experienced tinnitus for an undefined amount of time during the last year. Two hundred sixteen of 932 (23%) met our definition of having pathologic tinnitus (21% when weighted for age and gender). The median TFI score for all pathologic tinnitus participants was 16.6 (IQR 21.8). A percentage of 50.4% of the pathologic tinnitus participants had a TFI in the range 0–17, which can be interpreted as not a problem. Conclusion: Twenty-three percent (unweighted) or 21% (weighted) of our sample met our definition of pathologic tinnitus, which was based on a combination of duration and frequency over the last year. The TFI score of 47.7% of the pathologic tinnitus participants is ≥18. This indicates that they consider the tinnitus to be at least “a small problem” [11.1% (unweighted) or 8.9% (weighted) of the total study group]. This study illustrates the difficulties with defining pathologic tinnitus. In addition, it demonstrates that tinnitus prevalence numbers vary with different definitions and, consequently, stresses the importance of using a uniform definition of tinnitus. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8386349/ /pubmed/34456849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.690192 Text en Copyright © 2021 Rademaker, Smit, Brabers, de Jong, Stokroos and Stegeman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Rademaker, Maaike M. Smit, Adriana L. Brabers, Anne E. M. de Jong, Judith D. Stokroos, Robert J. Stegeman, Inge Using Different Cutoffs to Define Tinnitus and Assess Its Prevalence—A Survey in the Dutch General Population |
title | Using Different Cutoffs to Define Tinnitus and Assess Its Prevalence—A Survey in the Dutch General Population |
title_full | Using Different Cutoffs to Define Tinnitus and Assess Its Prevalence—A Survey in the Dutch General Population |
title_fullStr | Using Different Cutoffs to Define Tinnitus and Assess Its Prevalence—A Survey in the Dutch General Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Different Cutoffs to Define Tinnitus and Assess Its Prevalence—A Survey in the Dutch General Population |
title_short | Using Different Cutoffs to Define Tinnitus and Assess Its Prevalence—A Survey in the Dutch General Population |
title_sort | using different cutoffs to define tinnitus and assess its prevalence—a survey in the dutch general population |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34456849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.690192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rademakermaaikem usingdifferentcutoffstodefinetinnitusandassessitsprevalenceasurveyinthedutchgeneralpopulation AT smitadrianal usingdifferentcutoffstodefinetinnitusandassessitsprevalenceasurveyinthedutchgeneralpopulation AT brabersanneem usingdifferentcutoffstodefinetinnitusandassessitsprevalenceasurveyinthedutchgeneralpopulation AT dejongjudithd usingdifferentcutoffstodefinetinnitusandassessitsprevalenceasurveyinthedutchgeneralpopulation AT stokroosrobertj usingdifferentcutoffstodefinetinnitusandassessitsprevalenceasurveyinthedutchgeneralpopulation AT stegemaninge usingdifferentcutoffstodefinetinnitusandassessitsprevalenceasurveyinthedutchgeneralpopulation |