Cargando…
Evaluation of endometrial progesterone receptor expression after 12 weeks of exposure to a low-dose vaginal estradiol insert
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate endometrial progesterone receptor (PGR) expression in menopausal women who used vaginal 4-μg and 10-μg estradiol (E2) inserts or placebo. METHODS: REJOICE was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigating vaginal E2 inserts in women with moderate to severe dyspareunia d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001801 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate endometrial progesterone receptor (PGR) expression in menopausal women who used vaginal 4-μg and 10-μg estradiol (E2) inserts or placebo. METHODS: REJOICE was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigating vaginal E2 inserts in women with moderate to severe dyspareunia due to menopause. In this post hoc analysis, 25 eligible women with endometrial biopsies were randomly selected from each treatment group (4-μg and 10-μg E2 vaginal inserts and placebo). Endometrial biopsy sections were immunostained using an anti-PR (A and B) monoclonal antibody. Cell staining was quantified using an artificial intelligence feature-recognition algorithm. Mean PGR expression levels were analyzed between baseline and week 12. RESULTS: PGR expression results were available for 22 women in the 4-μg E2 group, and 25 women each for the 10-μg E2 and placebo groups. Similar PGR expression levels were observed at baseline (0.301-0.470 pmol/mg) and after 12 weeks of treatment (0.312-0.432 pmol/mg) for all treatment groups, with no significant differences between baseline and week 12. CONCLUSIONS: No meaningful differences in endometrial PGR expression were observed with the vaginal E2 (4- and 10-μg) inserts at week 12 from baseline, supporting the hypothesis that local exposure to E2 from a low-dose, vaginal insert placed near the vaginal introitus will not be sufficient to upregulate endometrial PGR expression. Coupled with the lack of histologic changes and systemic absorption, our data suggest that these softgel vaginal E2 inserts would not be expected to stimulate endometrial hyperplasia leading to a potential endometrial safety issue in postmenopausal women with moderate to severe dyspareunia, a symptom of vulvar and vaginal atrophy. Further study on the endometrial safety of softgel vaginal E2 inserts is under way. |
---|