Cargando…

Anterior Fontanel Size Among Term Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Anterior fontanel is an integral element of an infant craniofacial system. There are six fontanels in the newborn skull, namely anterior, posterior, two mastoid, and two sphenoid fontanels. The anterior fontanel is the largest, prominent, and most important for clinical evaluation. Sex,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oumer, Mohammed, Tazebew, Ashenafi, Alemayehu, Mekuriaw
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692179
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2021.1604044
_version_ 1783742313017638912
author Oumer, Mohammed
Tazebew, Ashenafi
Alemayehu, Mekuriaw
author_facet Oumer, Mohammed
Tazebew, Ashenafi
Alemayehu, Mekuriaw
author_sort Oumer, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description Background: Anterior fontanel is an integral element of an infant craniofacial system. There are six fontanels in the newborn skull, namely anterior, posterior, two mastoid, and two sphenoid fontanels. The anterior fontanel is the largest, prominent, and most important for clinical evaluation. Sex, race, genetics, gestational age, and region are the principal factors that influence anterior fontanel size. There exist inconclusive findings on the size of anterior fontanel in newborns. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled mean size of anterior fontanel among term newborns and to identify the pooled mean difference of anterior fontanel size between males and females. Methods: PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Science Direct, JBI Library, embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. All essential data were extracted using a standardized data extraction format. The heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q test statistic, I(2) test statistic, and p-values. A fixed-effect model and random effect model were used to estimate the pooled mean size of anterior fontanel and the pooled mean difference between male newborns and female newborns, respectively. To deal with heterogeneity, sub-group analysis, meta-regression analysis, and sensitivity analysis were considered. JBI quality appraisal checklist was used to evaluate the quality of studies. Results: In this meta-analysis, 8, 661 newborns were involved in twenty-six studies. Among studies, 13 conducted in Asia, 7 in Africa, 5 in America, and 1 in Europe. The pooled mean size of anterior fontanel was 2.58 cm (95% CI: 2.31, 2.85 cm). The pooled mean size of anterior fontanel for Asia, Africa, America, and Europe region was 2.49, 3.15, 2.35, and 2.01 cm, respectively. A statistically significant mean difference was detected between male and female newborns (D + L pooled MD = 0.15 cm, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.29 cm). Conclusion: The pooled estimate of this review does provide the mean value of the anterior fontanel size in the newborns. There was a statistically significant mean fontanel size difference between male and female newborns. Therefore, male newborns had a significantly larger mean size than female newborns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8386755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83867552021-10-21 Anterior Fontanel Size Among Term Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Oumer, Mohammed Tazebew, Ashenafi Alemayehu, Mekuriaw Public Health Rev Public Health Archive Background: Anterior fontanel is an integral element of an infant craniofacial system. There are six fontanels in the newborn skull, namely anterior, posterior, two mastoid, and two sphenoid fontanels. The anterior fontanel is the largest, prominent, and most important for clinical evaluation. Sex, race, genetics, gestational age, and region are the principal factors that influence anterior fontanel size. There exist inconclusive findings on the size of anterior fontanel in newborns. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled mean size of anterior fontanel among term newborns and to identify the pooled mean difference of anterior fontanel size between males and females. Methods: PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Science Direct, JBI Library, embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. All essential data were extracted using a standardized data extraction format. The heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q test statistic, I(2) test statistic, and p-values. A fixed-effect model and random effect model were used to estimate the pooled mean size of anterior fontanel and the pooled mean difference between male newborns and female newborns, respectively. To deal with heterogeneity, sub-group analysis, meta-regression analysis, and sensitivity analysis were considered. JBI quality appraisal checklist was used to evaluate the quality of studies. Results: In this meta-analysis, 8, 661 newborns were involved in twenty-six studies. Among studies, 13 conducted in Asia, 7 in Africa, 5 in America, and 1 in Europe. The pooled mean size of anterior fontanel was 2.58 cm (95% CI: 2.31, 2.85 cm). The pooled mean size of anterior fontanel for Asia, Africa, America, and Europe region was 2.49, 3.15, 2.35, and 2.01 cm, respectively. A statistically significant mean difference was detected between male and female newborns (D + L pooled MD = 0.15 cm, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.29 cm). Conclusion: The pooled estimate of this review does provide the mean value of the anterior fontanel size in the newborns. There was a statistically significant mean fontanel size difference between male and female newborns. Therefore, male newborns had a significantly larger mean size than female newborns. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8386755/ /pubmed/34692179 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2021.1604044 Text en Copyright © 2021 Oumer, Tazebew and Alemayehu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. PHR is edited by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) in a partnership with the Association of Schools of Public Health of the European Region (ASPHER)+
spellingShingle Public Health Archive
Oumer, Mohammed
Tazebew, Ashenafi
Alemayehu, Mekuriaw
Anterior Fontanel Size Among Term Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Anterior Fontanel Size Among Term Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Anterior Fontanel Size Among Term Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Anterior Fontanel Size Among Term Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Fontanel Size Among Term Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Anterior Fontanel Size Among Term Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort anterior fontanel size among term newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Public Health Archive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692179
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2021.1604044
work_keys_str_mv AT oumermohammed anteriorfontanelsizeamongtermnewbornsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tazebewashenafi anteriorfontanelsizeamongtermnewbornsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alemayehumekuriaw anteriorfontanelsizeamongtermnewbornsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis