Cargando…

What is the likely impact on surgical site infections in Australian hospitals if smoking rates are reduced? A cost analysis

INTRODUCTION: Assisting smokers to quit before surgery reduces surgical site infection (SSI) risk. The short-term economic benefits of reducing SSIs by embedding tobacco dependence treatment in Australian hospitals are unknown. Estimated annual number of SSIs prevented, and hospital bed-days (HBD) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCaffrey, Nikki, Scollo, Michelle, Dean, Emma, White, Sarah L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256424
_version_ 1783742334906662912
author McCaffrey, Nikki
Scollo, Michelle
Dean, Emma
White, Sarah L.
author_facet McCaffrey, Nikki
Scollo, Michelle
Dean, Emma
White, Sarah L.
author_sort McCaffrey, Nikki
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Assisting smokers to quit before surgery reduces surgical site infection (SSI) risk. The short-term economic benefits of reducing SSIs by embedding tobacco dependence treatment in Australian hospitals are unknown. Estimated annual number of SSIs prevented, and hospital bed-days (HBD) and costs saved from reducing smoking before surgery are calculated. METHODS: The most recent number of surgical procedures and SSI rates for Australia were sourced. The number of smokers and non-smokers having a SSI were calculated using the UK Royal College of Physicians reported adjusted odds ratio (1.79), and the proportion of SSIs attributable to smoking calculated. The potential impact fraction was used to estimate reductions in SSIs and associated HBDs and costs from reducing the smoking rates among surgical patients from 23.9% to 10% or 5% targets. Uncertainty around the final estimates was calculated using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In 2016–17, approximately 40,593 (95% UI 32,543, 50,239) people having a surgical procedure in Australia experienced a SSI leading to 101,888 extra days (95% UI 49,988, 200,822) in hospital. If the smoking rate among surgical patients was reduced to 10%, 3,580 (95% UI 2,312, 5,178) SSIs would be prevented, and 8,985 (95% UI 4,094, 19,153) HBDs and $19.1M (95% UI $7.7M, $42.5M) saved in one year. If the smoking rate was reduced to 5%, 4,867 (95% UI 3,268, 6,867) SSIs would be prevented, and 12,217 (95% UI 5,614, 25,642) HBDs and $26.0M (95% UI $10.8M, $57.0M) would be saved. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest achieving smoking rate targets of 10% or 5% would provide substantial short-term health and economic benefits through reductions in SSIs. Embedding tobacco dependence treatment in Australian hospitals would provide value for money by reducing costs and improving clinical quality and safety. A more comprehensive, modelled economic evaluation synthesising the best available evidence is needed to confirm findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8386862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83868622021-08-26 What is the likely impact on surgical site infections in Australian hospitals if smoking rates are reduced? A cost analysis McCaffrey, Nikki Scollo, Michelle Dean, Emma White, Sarah L. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Assisting smokers to quit before surgery reduces surgical site infection (SSI) risk. The short-term economic benefits of reducing SSIs by embedding tobacco dependence treatment in Australian hospitals are unknown. Estimated annual number of SSIs prevented, and hospital bed-days (HBD) and costs saved from reducing smoking before surgery are calculated. METHODS: The most recent number of surgical procedures and SSI rates for Australia were sourced. The number of smokers and non-smokers having a SSI were calculated using the UK Royal College of Physicians reported adjusted odds ratio (1.79), and the proportion of SSIs attributable to smoking calculated. The potential impact fraction was used to estimate reductions in SSIs and associated HBDs and costs from reducing the smoking rates among surgical patients from 23.9% to 10% or 5% targets. Uncertainty around the final estimates was calculated using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In 2016–17, approximately 40,593 (95% UI 32,543, 50,239) people having a surgical procedure in Australia experienced a SSI leading to 101,888 extra days (95% UI 49,988, 200,822) in hospital. If the smoking rate among surgical patients was reduced to 10%, 3,580 (95% UI 2,312, 5,178) SSIs would be prevented, and 8,985 (95% UI 4,094, 19,153) HBDs and $19.1M (95% UI $7.7M, $42.5M) saved in one year. If the smoking rate was reduced to 5%, 4,867 (95% UI 3,268, 6,867) SSIs would be prevented, and 12,217 (95% UI 5,614, 25,642) HBDs and $26.0M (95% UI $10.8M, $57.0M) would be saved. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest achieving smoking rate targets of 10% or 5% would provide substantial short-term health and economic benefits through reductions in SSIs. Embedding tobacco dependence treatment in Australian hospitals would provide value for money by reducing costs and improving clinical quality and safety. A more comprehensive, modelled economic evaluation synthesising the best available evidence is needed to confirm findings. Public Library of Science 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8386862/ /pubmed/34432843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256424 Text en © 2021 McCaffrey et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCaffrey, Nikki
Scollo, Michelle
Dean, Emma
White, Sarah L.
What is the likely impact on surgical site infections in Australian hospitals if smoking rates are reduced? A cost analysis
title What is the likely impact on surgical site infections in Australian hospitals if smoking rates are reduced? A cost analysis
title_full What is the likely impact on surgical site infections in Australian hospitals if smoking rates are reduced? A cost analysis
title_fullStr What is the likely impact on surgical site infections in Australian hospitals if smoking rates are reduced? A cost analysis
title_full_unstemmed What is the likely impact on surgical site infections in Australian hospitals if smoking rates are reduced? A cost analysis
title_short What is the likely impact on surgical site infections in Australian hospitals if smoking rates are reduced? A cost analysis
title_sort what is the likely impact on surgical site infections in australian hospitals if smoking rates are reduced? a cost analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256424
work_keys_str_mv AT mccaffreynikki whatisthelikelyimpactonsurgicalsiteinfectionsinaustralianhospitalsifsmokingratesarereducedacostanalysis
AT scollomichelle whatisthelikelyimpactonsurgicalsiteinfectionsinaustralianhospitalsifsmokingratesarereducedacostanalysis
AT deanemma whatisthelikelyimpactonsurgicalsiteinfectionsinaustralianhospitalsifsmokingratesarereducedacostanalysis
AT whitesarahl whatisthelikelyimpactonsurgicalsiteinfectionsinaustralianhospitalsifsmokingratesarereducedacostanalysis