Cargando…
Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study
BACKGROUND: Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, all Obstetrics and Gynecology fellowship interviews were held virtually for the 2020 fellowship match cycle. The aim of this study was to describe our initial experience with virtual Obstetrics and Gynecology fellowship interviews...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34433453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02893-4 |
_version_ | 1783742388390330368 |
---|---|
author | Peyser, Alexandra Gulersen, Moti Nimaroff, Michael Mullin, Christine Goldman, Randi H. |
author_facet | Peyser, Alexandra Gulersen, Moti Nimaroff, Michael Mullin, Christine Goldman, Randi H. |
author_sort | Peyser, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, all Obstetrics and Gynecology fellowship interviews were held virtually for the 2020 fellowship match cycle. The aim of this study was to describe our initial experience with virtual Obstetrics and Gynecology fellowship interviews and evaluate its effectiveness in assessing candidates. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey study that included all interviewing attending physicians and fellows from five Obstetrics and Gynecology subspecialties at a single academic institution following the 2020–2021 fellowship interview season. The survey consisted of 19 questions aimed to evaluate each subspecialty’s virtual interview process, including its feasibility and performance in evaluating applicants. The primary outcome was the subjective utility of virtual interviews. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of responses from fellows and attending physicians. RESULTS: Thirty-six attendings and fellows completed the survey (36/53, 68% response rate). Interviewers felt applicants were able to convey themselves adequately during the virtual interview (92%) and the majority (70%) agreed that virtual interviews should be offered in future years. Attending physicians were more likely than fellows to state that the virtual interview process adequately assessed the candidates (Likert Scale Mean: 4.4 vs. 3.8, respectively, p = 0.02). Respondents highlighted decreased cost, time saved, and increased flexibility as benefits to the virtual interview process. CONCLUSION: The use of virtual interviews provides a favorable method for conducting fellowship interviews and should be considered for use in future application cycles. Most respondents were satisfied with the virtual interview process and found they were an effective tool for evaluating applicants. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02893-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8387093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83870932021-08-26 Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study Peyser, Alexandra Gulersen, Moti Nimaroff, Michael Mullin, Christine Goldman, Randi H. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, all Obstetrics and Gynecology fellowship interviews were held virtually for the 2020 fellowship match cycle. The aim of this study was to describe our initial experience with virtual Obstetrics and Gynecology fellowship interviews and evaluate its effectiveness in assessing candidates. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey study that included all interviewing attending physicians and fellows from five Obstetrics and Gynecology subspecialties at a single academic institution following the 2020–2021 fellowship interview season. The survey consisted of 19 questions aimed to evaluate each subspecialty’s virtual interview process, including its feasibility and performance in evaluating applicants. The primary outcome was the subjective utility of virtual interviews. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of responses from fellows and attending physicians. RESULTS: Thirty-six attendings and fellows completed the survey (36/53, 68% response rate). Interviewers felt applicants were able to convey themselves adequately during the virtual interview (92%) and the majority (70%) agreed that virtual interviews should be offered in future years. Attending physicians were more likely than fellows to state that the virtual interview process adequately assessed the candidates (Likert Scale Mean: 4.4 vs. 3.8, respectively, p = 0.02). Respondents highlighted decreased cost, time saved, and increased flexibility as benefits to the virtual interview process. CONCLUSION: The use of virtual interviews provides a favorable method for conducting fellowship interviews and should be considered for use in future application cycles. Most respondents were satisfied with the virtual interview process and found they were an effective tool for evaluating applicants. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02893-4. BioMed Central 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8387093/ /pubmed/34433453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02893-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Peyser, Alexandra Gulersen, Moti Nimaroff, Michael Mullin, Christine Goldman, Randi H. Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study |
title | Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study |
title_full | Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study |
title_fullStr | Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study |
title_full_unstemmed | Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study |
title_short | Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study |
title_sort | virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pandemic: a survey study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34433453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02893-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peyseralexandra virtualobstetricsandgynecologyfellowshipinterviewsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicasurveystudy AT gulersenmoti virtualobstetricsandgynecologyfellowshipinterviewsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicasurveystudy AT nimaroffmichael virtualobstetricsandgynecologyfellowshipinterviewsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicasurveystudy AT mullinchristine virtualobstetricsandgynecologyfellowshipinterviewsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicasurveystudy AT goldmanrandih virtualobstetricsandgynecologyfellowshipinterviewsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicasurveystudy |