Cargando…
Digital PCR can augment the interpretation of RT-qPCR Cq values for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics()
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious, acute respiratory disease caused mainly by person-to-person transmission of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Its emergence has caused a world-wide acute health crisis, intensified by the challenge of reliably identifying individuals likely to transmit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.08.006 |
_version_ | 1783742395822637056 |
---|---|
author | Whale, Alexandra S. von der Heide, Eva K. Kohlenberg, Max Brinckmann, Anja Baedker, Silke Karalay, Oezlem Fernandez-Gonzalez, Ana Busby, Eloise J. Bustin, Stephen A. Hauser, Heiko Missel, Andreas O'Sullivan, Denise M. Huggett, Jim F. Pfaffl, Michael W. Nolan, Tania |
author_facet | Whale, Alexandra S. von der Heide, Eva K. Kohlenberg, Max Brinckmann, Anja Baedker, Silke Karalay, Oezlem Fernandez-Gonzalez, Ana Busby, Eloise J. Bustin, Stephen A. Hauser, Heiko Missel, Andreas O'Sullivan, Denise M. Huggett, Jim F. Pfaffl, Michael W. Nolan, Tania |
author_sort | Whale, Alexandra S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious, acute respiratory disease caused mainly by person-to-person transmission of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Its emergence has caused a world-wide acute health crisis, intensified by the challenge of reliably identifying individuals likely to transmit the disease. Diagnosis is hampered by the many unknowns surrounding this disease, including those relating to infectious viral burden. This uncertainty is exacerbated by disagreement surrounding the clinical relevance of molecular testing using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for the presence of viral RNA, most often based on the reporting of quantification cycles (Cq), which is also termed the cycle threshold (Ct) or crossing point (Cp). Despite it being common knowledge that Cqs are relative values varying according to a wide range of different parameters, there have been efforts to use them as though they were absolute units, with Cqs below an arbitrarily determined value, deemed to signify a positive result and those above, a negative one. Our results investigated the effects of a range of common variables on Cq values. These data include a detailed analysis of the effect of different carrier molecules on RNA extraction. The impact of sample matrix of buccal swabs and saliva on RNA extraction efficiency was demonstrated in RT-qPCR and the impact of potentially inhibiting compounds in urine along with bile salts were investigated in RT-digital PCR (RT-dPCR). The latter studies were performed such that the impact on the RT step could be separated from the PCR step. In this way, the RT was shown to be more susceptible to inhibitors than the PCR. Together, these studies demonstrate that the consequent variability of test results makes subjective Cq cut-off values unsuitable for the identification of infectious individuals. We also discuss the importance of using reliable control materials for accurate quantification and highlight the substantial role played by dPCR as a method for their development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8387146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83871462021-08-26 Digital PCR can augment the interpretation of RT-qPCR Cq values for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics() Whale, Alexandra S. von der Heide, Eva K. Kohlenberg, Max Brinckmann, Anja Baedker, Silke Karalay, Oezlem Fernandez-Gonzalez, Ana Busby, Eloise J. Bustin, Stephen A. Hauser, Heiko Missel, Andreas O'Sullivan, Denise M. Huggett, Jim F. Pfaffl, Michael W. Nolan, Tania Methods Article Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious, acute respiratory disease caused mainly by person-to-person transmission of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Its emergence has caused a world-wide acute health crisis, intensified by the challenge of reliably identifying individuals likely to transmit the disease. Diagnosis is hampered by the many unknowns surrounding this disease, including those relating to infectious viral burden. This uncertainty is exacerbated by disagreement surrounding the clinical relevance of molecular testing using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for the presence of viral RNA, most often based on the reporting of quantification cycles (Cq), which is also termed the cycle threshold (Ct) or crossing point (Cp). Despite it being common knowledge that Cqs are relative values varying according to a wide range of different parameters, there have been efforts to use them as though they were absolute units, with Cqs below an arbitrarily determined value, deemed to signify a positive result and those above, a negative one. Our results investigated the effects of a range of common variables on Cq values. These data include a detailed analysis of the effect of different carrier molecules on RNA extraction. The impact of sample matrix of buccal swabs and saliva on RNA extraction efficiency was demonstrated in RT-qPCR and the impact of potentially inhibiting compounds in urine along with bile salts were investigated in RT-digital PCR (RT-dPCR). The latter studies were performed such that the impact on the RT step could be separated from the PCR step. In this way, the RT was shown to be more susceptible to inhibitors than the PCR. Together, these studies demonstrate that the consequent variability of test results makes subjective Cq cut-off values unsuitable for the identification of infectious individuals. We also discuss the importance of using reliable control materials for accurate quantification and highlight the substantial role played by dPCR as a method for their development. Elsevier Inc. 2022-05 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8387146/ /pubmed/34454016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.08.006 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Whale, Alexandra S. von der Heide, Eva K. Kohlenberg, Max Brinckmann, Anja Baedker, Silke Karalay, Oezlem Fernandez-Gonzalez, Ana Busby, Eloise J. Bustin, Stephen A. Hauser, Heiko Missel, Andreas O'Sullivan, Denise M. Huggett, Jim F. Pfaffl, Michael W. Nolan, Tania Digital PCR can augment the interpretation of RT-qPCR Cq values for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics() |
title | Digital PCR can augment the interpretation of RT-qPCR Cq values for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics() |
title_full | Digital PCR can augment the interpretation of RT-qPCR Cq values for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics() |
title_fullStr | Digital PCR can augment the interpretation of RT-qPCR Cq values for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics() |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital PCR can augment the interpretation of RT-qPCR Cq values for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics() |
title_short | Digital PCR can augment the interpretation of RT-qPCR Cq values for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics() |
title_sort | digital pcr can augment the interpretation of rt-qpcr cq values for sars-cov-2 diagnostics() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.08.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whalealexandras digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT vonderheideevak digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT kohlenbergmax digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT brinckmannanja digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT baedkersilke digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT karalayoezlem digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT fernandezgonzalezana digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT busbyeloisej digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT bustinstephena digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT hauserheiko digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT misselandreas digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT osullivandenisem digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT huggettjimf digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT pfafflmichaelw digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics AT nolantania digitalpcrcanaugmenttheinterpretationofrtqpcrcqvaluesforsarscov2diagnostics |