Cargando…
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5018791 |
_version_ | 1783742405900500992 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Jin Zhu, Huanye Gao, Chao |
author_facet | Cao, Jin Zhu, Huanye Gao, Chao |
author_sort | Cao, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular fractures. METHODS: The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Four major electronic databases were searched (inception to February 2021). Studies were screened using a priori criteria. Data from each study were extracted by two independent reviewers and organized using a standardized table. Data were pooled and presented in forest plots. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. Four were prospective randomized trials, and nine used a retrospective comparative design. The patients aged between 32.1 (SD 14.6) years and 51.9 (SD 18.9) years. Based on the pooled analyses, overall, 3D printing-assisted surgery decreased operation time by 38.8 minutes (95% CI: -54.9, -22.8), intraoperative blood loss by 259.7 ml (95% CI: -394.6, -124.9), instrumentation time by 34.1 minutes (95% CI: -49.0, -19.1). Traditional surgery was less likely to achieve good/excellent function of hip (RR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.82) and more likely to have complications than 3D printing-assisted surgery (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.33). CONCLUSIONS: 3D printing technology demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acetabular fractures. It may improve surgery-related and clinical outcomes. More prospective studies using a rigorous design (e.g., randomized trial with blinding) are warranted to confirm the long-term effects of 3D printing technology in orthopedics surgeries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8387177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83871772021-08-26 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures Cao, Jin Zhu, Huanye Gao, Chao Biomed Res Int Review Article PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular fractures. METHODS: The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Four major electronic databases were searched (inception to February 2021). Studies were screened using a priori criteria. Data from each study were extracted by two independent reviewers and organized using a standardized table. Data were pooled and presented in forest plots. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. Four were prospective randomized trials, and nine used a retrospective comparative design. The patients aged between 32.1 (SD 14.6) years and 51.9 (SD 18.9) years. Based on the pooled analyses, overall, 3D printing-assisted surgery decreased operation time by 38.8 minutes (95% CI: -54.9, -22.8), intraoperative blood loss by 259.7 ml (95% CI: -394.6, -124.9), instrumentation time by 34.1 minutes (95% CI: -49.0, -19.1). Traditional surgery was less likely to achieve good/excellent function of hip (RR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.82) and more likely to have complications than 3D printing-assisted surgery (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.33). CONCLUSIONS: 3D printing technology demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acetabular fractures. It may improve surgery-related and clinical outcomes. More prospective studies using a rigorous design (e.g., randomized trial with blinding) are warranted to confirm the long-term effects of 3D printing technology in orthopedics surgeries. Hindawi 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8387177/ /pubmed/34458367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5018791 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jin Cao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Cao, Jin Zhu, Huanye Gao, Chao A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures |
title | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures |
title_full | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures |
title_short | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of 3d printing technology for the treatment of acetabular fractures |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5018791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caojin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures AT zhuhuanye asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures AT gaochao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures AT caojin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures AT zhuhuanye systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures AT gaochao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures |