Cargando…

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures

PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Jin, Zhu, Huanye, Gao, Chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5018791
_version_ 1783742405900500992
author Cao, Jin
Zhu, Huanye
Gao, Chao
author_facet Cao, Jin
Zhu, Huanye
Gao, Chao
author_sort Cao, Jin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular fractures. METHODS: The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Four major electronic databases were searched (inception to February 2021). Studies were screened using a priori criteria. Data from each study were extracted by two independent reviewers and organized using a standardized table. Data were pooled and presented in forest plots. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. Four were prospective randomized trials, and nine used a retrospective comparative design. The patients aged between 32.1 (SD 14.6) years and 51.9 (SD 18.9) years. Based on the pooled analyses, overall, 3D printing-assisted surgery decreased operation time by 38.8 minutes (95% CI: -54.9, -22.8), intraoperative blood loss by 259.7 ml (95% CI: -394.6, -124.9), instrumentation time by 34.1 minutes (95% CI: -49.0, -19.1). Traditional surgery was less likely to achieve good/excellent function of hip (RR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.82) and more likely to have complications than 3D printing-assisted surgery (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.33). CONCLUSIONS: 3D printing technology demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acetabular fractures. It may improve surgery-related and clinical outcomes. More prospective studies using a rigorous design (e.g., randomized trial with blinding) are warranted to confirm the long-term effects of 3D printing technology in orthopedics surgeries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8387177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83871772021-08-26 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures Cao, Jin Zhu, Huanye Gao, Chao Biomed Res Int Review Article PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular fractures. METHODS: The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Four major electronic databases were searched (inception to February 2021). Studies were screened using a priori criteria. Data from each study were extracted by two independent reviewers and organized using a standardized table. Data were pooled and presented in forest plots. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. Four were prospective randomized trials, and nine used a retrospective comparative design. The patients aged between 32.1 (SD 14.6) years and 51.9 (SD 18.9) years. Based on the pooled analyses, overall, 3D printing-assisted surgery decreased operation time by 38.8 minutes (95% CI: -54.9, -22.8), intraoperative blood loss by 259.7 ml (95% CI: -394.6, -124.9), instrumentation time by 34.1 minutes (95% CI: -49.0, -19.1). Traditional surgery was less likely to achieve good/excellent function of hip (RR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.82) and more likely to have complications than 3D printing-assisted surgery (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.33). CONCLUSIONS: 3D printing technology demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acetabular fractures. It may improve surgery-related and clinical outcomes. More prospective studies using a rigorous design (e.g., randomized trial with blinding) are warranted to confirm the long-term effects of 3D printing technology in orthopedics surgeries. Hindawi 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8387177/ /pubmed/34458367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5018791 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jin Cao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cao, Jin
Zhu, Huanye
Gao, Chao
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of 3d printing technology for the treatment of acetabular fractures
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5018791
work_keys_str_mv AT caojin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT zhuhuanye asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT gaochao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT caojin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT zhuhuanye systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT gaochao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures