Cargando…

Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum

Since 2000, robotic-assisted surgery has rapidly expanded into almost every surgical sub-specialty. Despite the popularity of robotic surgery across the United States, a national consensus for standardized training and education of robotic surgeons or surgical teams remains absent. In this quality i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, Jill M., Walsh, Danielle S., Hudson, John, Henderson, Shakira, Thompson, Julie, Zychowicz, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01291-8
_version_ 1783742414943420416
author Collins, Jill M.
Walsh, Danielle S.
Hudson, John
Henderson, Shakira
Thompson, Julie
Zychowicz, Michael
author_facet Collins, Jill M.
Walsh, Danielle S.
Hudson, John
Henderson, Shakira
Thompson, Julie
Zychowicz, Michael
author_sort Collins, Jill M.
collection PubMed
description Since 2000, robotic-assisted surgery has rapidly expanded into almost every surgical sub-specialty. Despite the popularity of robotic surgery across the United States, a national consensus for standardized training and education of robotic surgeons or surgical teams remains absent. In this quality improvement initiative, a novel, stepwise iterative Robotic Assistant Surgical Training (RAST) curriculum was developed to broaden and standardize robotic bedside assistant training. Thirteen voluntary participants, capable of fulfilling the bedside assistant role, were evaluated to determine if RAST enhanced the learner’s self-perceived level of confidence and comfort in their role as bedside assistant. A pre- and post-RAST training survey and a between-stages repeated-measures survey were conducted. All learner participants reported statistically significant increases in confidence and comfort after RAST training, (p =  < 0.001), and between each stage, F (2, 24 = 60.47, p < .001; [Formula: see text]  = 0.834). Participant feedback regarding curriculum improvement was obtained, suggesting the desire for more training and practice, in smaller groups of 2–3 participants. One hundred percent of participants felt RAST was beneficial and that it should be implemented as standardized training during onboarding for all robotic bedside assistants. Thus, a standardized, stepwise iterative robotic bedside assistant curriculum increases learner preparedness, comfort, and confidence, safely away from the patient bedside. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-021-01291-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8387210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83872102021-08-26 Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum Collins, Jill M. Walsh, Danielle S. Hudson, John Henderson, Shakira Thompson, Julie Zychowicz, Michael J Robot Surg Original Article Since 2000, robotic-assisted surgery has rapidly expanded into almost every surgical sub-specialty. Despite the popularity of robotic surgery across the United States, a national consensus for standardized training and education of robotic surgeons or surgical teams remains absent. In this quality improvement initiative, a novel, stepwise iterative Robotic Assistant Surgical Training (RAST) curriculum was developed to broaden and standardize robotic bedside assistant training. Thirteen voluntary participants, capable of fulfilling the bedside assistant role, were evaluated to determine if RAST enhanced the learner’s self-perceived level of confidence and comfort in their role as bedside assistant. A pre- and post-RAST training survey and a between-stages repeated-measures survey were conducted. All learner participants reported statistically significant increases in confidence and comfort after RAST training, (p =  < 0.001), and between each stage, F (2, 24 = 60.47, p < .001; [Formula: see text]  = 0.834). Participant feedback regarding curriculum improvement was obtained, suggesting the desire for more training and practice, in smaller groups of 2–3 participants. One hundred percent of participants felt RAST was beneficial and that it should be implemented as standardized training during onboarding for all robotic bedside assistants. Thus, a standardized, stepwise iterative robotic bedside assistant curriculum increases learner preparedness, comfort, and confidence, safely away from the patient bedside. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11701-021-01291-8. Springer London 2021-08-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8387210/ /pubmed/34435279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01291-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Collins, Jill M.
Walsh, Danielle S.
Hudson, John
Henderson, Shakira
Thompson, Julie
Zychowicz, Michael
Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum
title Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum
title_full Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum
title_fullStr Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum
title_short Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum
title_sort implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01291-8
work_keys_str_mv AT collinsjillm implementationofastandardizedroboticassistantsurgicaltrainingcurriculum
AT walshdanielles implementationofastandardizedroboticassistantsurgicaltrainingcurriculum
AT hudsonjohn implementationofastandardizedroboticassistantsurgicaltrainingcurriculum
AT hendersonshakira implementationofastandardizedroboticassistantsurgicaltrainingcurriculum
AT thompsonjulie implementationofastandardizedroboticassistantsurgicaltrainingcurriculum
AT zychowiczmichael implementationofastandardizedroboticassistantsurgicaltrainingcurriculum