Cargando…

Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy

There is increasing demand for science to contribute to solving societal problems (solutionism). Thereby, scientists may become normative activists for solving certain problems (advocacy). When doing this, they may insufficiently differentiate between scientific and political modes of reasoning and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scholz, Roland W., Wellmer, Friedrich W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34462645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01006-w
_version_ 1783742415165718528
author Scholz, Roland W.
Wellmer, Friedrich W.
author_facet Scholz, Roland W.
Wellmer, Friedrich W.
author_sort Scholz, Roland W.
collection PubMed
description There is increasing demand for science to contribute to solving societal problems (solutionism). Thereby, scientists may become normative activists for solving certain problems (advocacy). When doing this, they may insufficiently differentiate between scientific and political modes of reasoning and validation (de-differentiationism), which is sometimes linked to questionable forms of utilizing the force of facts (German: Faktengewalt). Scientific findings are simplified and communicated in such a way that they acquire a status as unfalsifiable and absolutely true (truth to power). This becomes critical if the consistency and validation of the findings are questionable and scientific models underlying science activists’ actions are doubtful, oversimplified, or incorrect. Herein, we exemplarily elaborate how the integrity of science is endangered by normative solutionist and sociopolitically driven transition management and present mineral scarcity claims that ignore that reserves or resources are dynamic geotechnological-socioeconomic entities. We present the main mineral scarcity models and their fallacious assumptions. We then discuss the phosphorus scarcity fallacy, which is of particular interest as phosphorus is non-substitutable and half of all current food production depends on fertilizers (and thus phosphorus). We show that phosphorus scarcity claims are based on integrating basic geoeconomic knowledge and discuss cognitive and epistemological barriers and motivational and sociopolitical drivers promoting the scarcity fallacy, which affects high-level public media. This may induce unsustainable environmental action. Scientists as honest knowledge brokers should communicate the strengths but also the constraints and limits of scientific modeling and of applying it in reality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-021-01006-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8387211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83872112021-08-26 Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy Scholz, Roland W. Wellmer, Friedrich W. Sustain Sci Review Article There is increasing demand for science to contribute to solving societal problems (solutionism). Thereby, scientists may become normative activists for solving certain problems (advocacy). When doing this, they may insufficiently differentiate between scientific and political modes of reasoning and validation (de-differentiationism), which is sometimes linked to questionable forms of utilizing the force of facts (German: Faktengewalt). Scientific findings are simplified and communicated in such a way that they acquire a status as unfalsifiable and absolutely true (truth to power). This becomes critical if the consistency and validation of the findings are questionable and scientific models underlying science activists’ actions are doubtful, oversimplified, or incorrect. Herein, we exemplarily elaborate how the integrity of science is endangered by normative solutionist and sociopolitically driven transition management and present mineral scarcity claims that ignore that reserves or resources are dynamic geotechnological-socioeconomic entities. We present the main mineral scarcity models and their fallacious assumptions. We then discuss the phosphorus scarcity fallacy, which is of particular interest as phosphorus is non-substitutable and half of all current food production depends on fertilizers (and thus phosphorus). We show that phosphorus scarcity claims are based on integrating basic geoeconomic knowledge and discuss cognitive and epistemological barriers and motivational and sociopolitical drivers promoting the scarcity fallacy, which affects high-level public media. This may induce unsustainable environmental action. Scientists as honest knowledge brokers should communicate the strengths but also the constraints and limits of scientific modeling and of applying it in reality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-021-01006-w. Springer Japan 2021-08-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8387211/ /pubmed/34462645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01006-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Scholz, Roland W.
Wellmer, Friedrich W.
Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy
title Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy
title_full Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy
title_fullStr Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy
title_full_unstemmed Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy
title_short Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy
title_sort endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: general considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34462645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01006-w
work_keys_str_mv AT scholzrolandw endangeringtheintegrityofsciencebymisusingunvalidatedmodelsanduntestedassumptionsasfactsgeneralconsiderationsandthemineralandphosphorusscarcityfallacy
AT wellmerfriedrichw endangeringtheintegrityofsciencebymisusingunvalidatedmodelsanduntestedassumptionsasfactsgeneralconsiderationsandthemineralandphosphorusscarcityfallacy