Cargando…

Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation

Impression accuracy is fundamental to achieve a passive fit between implants and the superstructure. Three transfer types were tested to evaluate the differences in impression accuracy and their efficiency in case of different implant angles. A master model with four implant analogues placed at 0°,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farronato, Davide, Pasini, Pietro Mario, Campana, Veronica, Lops, Diego, Azzi, Lorenzo, Manfredini, Mattia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00619-y
_version_ 1783742428651454464
author Farronato, Davide
Pasini, Pietro Mario
Campana, Veronica
Lops, Diego
Azzi, Lorenzo
Manfredini, Mattia
author_facet Farronato, Davide
Pasini, Pietro Mario
Campana, Veronica
Lops, Diego
Azzi, Lorenzo
Manfredini, Mattia
author_sort Farronato, Davide
collection PubMed
description Impression accuracy is fundamental to achieve a passive fit between implants and the superstructure. Three transfer types were tested to evaluate the differences in impression accuracy and their efficiency in case of different implant angles. A master model with four implant analogues placed at 0°, 15° and 35° was used. 27 impressions were taken with three different types of impression coping: closed tray technique coping (CT), open tray technique coping (COT) and telescopic open tray coping (TOT). The impressions were poured. Analogues were matched with scan bodies to be scanned and exported in STL. An implant bar was designed from each STL and another one from the master model. A comparison between these bars was obtained. Linear and angular measurements for every type of coping were calculated for different angulations. The collected data were analyzed with ANOVA test (95% of confidence). Student’s t test showed a significative discrepancy (p ≤ 0.001) on linear and angular measurements on Δx, Δy, Δz with different transfer types as well as diverse implant positioning angles (p ≤ 0.001). Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the coping type and the implants divergence may be significant parameters influencing the impression accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8387271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83872712021-09-09 Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation Farronato, Davide Pasini, Pietro Mario Campana, Veronica Lops, Diego Azzi, Lorenzo Manfredini, Mattia Odontology Original Article Impression accuracy is fundamental to achieve a passive fit between implants and the superstructure. Three transfer types were tested to evaluate the differences in impression accuracy and their efficiency in case of different implant angles. A master model with four implant analogues placed at 0°, 15° and 35° was used. 27 impressions were taken with three different types of impression coping: closed tray technique coping (CT), open tray technique coping (COT) and telescopic open tray coping (TOT). The impressions were poured. Analogues were matched with scan bodies to be scanned and exported in STL. An implant bar was designed from each STL and another one from the master model. A comparison between these bars was obtained. Linear and angular measurements for every type of coping were calculated for different angulations. The collected data were analyzed with ANOVA test (95% of confidence). Student’s t test showed a significative discrepancy (p ≤ 0.001) on linear and angular measurements on Δx, Δy, Δz with different transfer types as well as diverse implant positioning angles (p ≤ 0.001). Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the coping type and the implants divergence may be significant parameters influencing the impression accuracy. Springer Singapore 2021-06-01 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8387271/ /pubmed/34075492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00619-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Farronato, Davide
Pasini, Pietro Mario
Campana, Veronica
Lops, Diego
Azzi, Lorenzo
Manfredini, Mattia
Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
title Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
title_full Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
title_fullStr Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
title_short Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
title_sort can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? a 3d in vitro evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00619-y
work_keys_str_mv AT farronatodavide cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation
AT pasinipietromario cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation
AT campanaveronica cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation
AT lopsdiego cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation
AT azzilorenzo cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation
AT manfredinimattia cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation