Cargando…
Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
Impression accuracy is fundamental to achieve a passive fit between implants and the superstructure. Three transfer types were tested to evaluate the differences in impression accuracy and their efficiency in case of different implant angles. A master model with four implant analogues placed at 0°,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00619-y |
_version_ | 1783742428651454464 |
---|---|
author | Farronato, Davide Pasini, Pietro Mario Campana, Veronica Lops, Diego Azzi, Lorenzo Manfredini, Mattia |
author_facet | Farronato, Davide Pasini, Pietro Mario Campana, Veronica Lops, Diego Azzi, Lorenzo Manfredini, Mattia |
author_sort | Farronato, Davide |
collection | PubMed |
description | Impression accuracy is fundamental to achieve a passive fit between implants and the superstructure. Three transfer types were tested to evaluate the differences in impression accuracy and their efficiency in case of different implant angles. A master model with four implant analogues placed at 0°, 15° and 35° was used. 27 impressions were taken with three different types of impression coping: closed tray technique coping (CT), open tray technique coping (COT) and telescopic open tray coping (TOT). The impressions were poured. Analogues were matched with scan bodies to be scanned and exported in STL. An implant bar was designed from each STL and another one from the master model. A comparison between these bars was obtained. Linear and angular measurements for every type of coping were calculated for different angulations. The collected data were analyzed with ANOVA test (95% of confidence). Student’s t test showed a significative discrepancy (p ≤ 0.001) on linear and angular measurements on Δx, Δy, Δz with different transfer types as well as diverse implant positioning angles (p ≤ 0.001). Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the coping type and the implants divergence may be significant parameters influencing the impression accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8387271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83872712021-09-09 Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation Farronato, Davide Pasini, Pietro Mario Campana, Veronica Lops, Diego Azzi, Lorenzo Manfredini, Mattia Odontology Original Article Impression accuracy is fundamental to achieve a passive fit between implants and the superstructure. Three transfer types were tested to evaluate the differences in impression accuracy and their efficiency in case of different implant angles. A master model with four implant analogues placed at 0°, 15° and 35° was used. 27 impressions were taken with three different types of impression coping: closed tray technique coping (CT), open tray technique coping (COT) and telescopic open tray coping (TOT). The impressions were poured. Analogues were matched with scan bodies to be scanned and exported in STL. An implant bar was designed from each STL and another one from the master model. A comparison between these bars was obtained. Linear and angular measurements for every type of coping were calculated for different angulations. The collected data were analyzed with ANOVA test (95% of confidence). Student’s t test showed a significative discrepancy (p ≤ 0.001) on linear and angular measurements on Δx, Δy, Δz with different transfer types as well as diverse implant positioning angles (p ≤ 0.001). Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the coping type and the implants divergence may be significant parameters influencing the impression accuracy. Springer Singapore 2021-06-01 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8387271/ /pubmed/34075492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00619-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Farronato, Davide Pasini, Pietro Mario Campana, Veronica Lops, Diego Azzi, Lorenzo Manfredini, Mattia Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation |
title | Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation |
title_full | Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation |
title_fullStr | Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation |
title_short | Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation |
title_sort | can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? a 3d in vitro evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00619-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farronatodavide cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation AT pasinipietromario cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation AT campanaveronica cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation AT lopsdiego cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation AT azzilorenzo cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation AT manfredinimattia cantransfertypeandimplantangulationaffectimpressionaccuracya3dinvitroevaluation |