Cargando…

Thai version of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Thai Q-DFD): validity and reliability

AIMS: To reduce diabetic foot complications, an annual screening of diabetes-related foot disease (DRFD) should be promoted. The screening tool as the Thai translated Questionnaire for Diabetes-related Foot Disease, Thai Q-DFD, has been established. The study was designed to assess the validity and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thungtak, Rapeepun, Wannapakhe, Jirabhorn, Lapanantasin, Saitida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07832
_version_ 1783742508271927296
author Thungtak, Rapeepun
Wannapakhe, Jirabhorn
Lapanantasin, Saitida
author_facet Thungtak, Rapeepun
Wannapakhe, Jirabhorn
Lapanantasin, Saitida
author_sort Thungtak, Rapeepun
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To reduce diabetic foot complications, an annual screening of diabetes-related foot disease (DRFD) should be promoted. The screening tool as the Thai translated Questionnaire for Diabetes-related Foot Disease, Thai Q-DFD, has been established. The study was designed to assess the validity and reliability of the Thai Q-DFD before practical use in the community. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine persons with diabetes volunteered in a concurrent validity testing for agreement in diagnosis between the Thai Q-DFD and the standard clinical examinations. The test-retest reliability (a stability of a tool over time between three days apart) was assessed in 50 volunteers. The agreement in either validity or reliability test was evaluated using kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The screening diagnosis as DRFD by the Thai Q-DFD substantially agreed with that by the standard clinical examinations (kappa = 0.71). The Thai Q-DFD also showed high sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.78). Additionally, the Thai Q-DFD presented good test-retest reliability for DRFD diagnosis (kappa = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: The Thai Q-DFD is comparable to the original English version in terms of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. Therefore, it can be used for a screening of DRFD in Thai people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8387758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83877582021-08-31 Thai version of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Thai Q-DFD): validity and reliability Thungtak, Rapeepun Wannapakhe, Jirabhorn Lapanantasin, Saitida Heliyon Research Article AIMS: To reduce diabetic foot complications, an annual screening of diabetes-related foot disease (DRFD) should be promoted. The screening tool as the Thai translated Questionnaire for Diabetes-related Foot Disease, Thai Q-DFD, has been established. The study was designed to assess the validity and reliability of the Thai Q-DFD before practical use in the community. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine persons with diabetes volunteered in a concurrent validity testing for agreement in diagnosis between the Thai Q-DFD and the standard clinical examinations. The test-retest reliability (a stability of a tool over time between three days apart) was assessed in 50 volunteers. The agreement in either validity or reliability test was evaluated using kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The screening diagnosis as DRFD by the Thai Q-DFD substantially agreed with that by the standard clinical examinations (kappa = 0.71). The Thai Q-DFD also showed high sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.78). Additionally, the Thai Q-DFD presented good test-retest reliability for DRFD diagnosis (kappa = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: The Thai Q-DFD is comparable to the original English version in terms of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. Therefore, it can be used for a screening of DRFD in Thai people. Elsevier 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8387758/ /pubmed/34471712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07832 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Thungtak, Rapeepun
Wannapakhe, Jirabhorn
Lapanantasin, Saitida
Thai version of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Thai Q-DFD): validity and reliability
title Thai version of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Thai Q-DFD): validity and reliability
title_full Thai version of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Thai Q-DFD): validity and reliability
title_fullStr Thai version of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Thai Q-DFD): validity and reliability
title_full_unstemmed Thai version of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Thai Q-DFD): validity and reliability
title_short Thai version of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Thai Q-DFD): validity and reliability
title_sort thai version of the questionnaire for diabetes-related foot disease (thai q-dfd): validity and reliability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07832
work_keys_str_mv AT thungtakrapeepun thaiversionofthequestionnairefordiabetesrelatedfootdiseasethaiqdfdvalidityandreliability
AT wannapakhejirabhorn thaiversionofthequestionnairefordiabetesrelatedfootdiseasethaiqdfdvalidityandreliability
AT lapanantasinsaitida thaiversionofthequestionnairefordiabetesrelatedfootdiseasethaiqdfdvalidityandreliability