Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Qingfei Paidu decoction (QFPD) has been widely used in treating COVID-19 in China. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive and systematic evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of QFPD. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QFPD in patients with COV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Qi, Zhu, Hongfei, Li, Mengting, Liu, Yafei, Lai, Honghao, Yang, Qiuyu, Cao, Xiao, Ge, Long
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34456720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.688857
_version_ 1783742524936945664
author Wang, Qi
Zhu, Hongfei
Li, Mengting
Liu, Yafei
Lai, Honghao
Yang, Qiuyu
Cao, Xiao
Ge, Long
author_facet Wang, Qi
Zhu, Hongfei
Li, Mengting
Liu, Yafei
Lai, Honghao
Yang, Qiuyu
Cao, Xiao
Ge, Long
author_sort Wang, Qi
collection PubMed
description Background: Qingfei Paidu decoction (QFPD) has been widely used in treating COVID-19 in China. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive and systematic evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of QFPD. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QFPD in patients with COVID-19. Methods: We searched seven databases up to 5 March 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data of interest, and assessed risk of bias. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias of cohort and non-randomized trials. The “Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies With No Control Group” was adopted for controlled pre–post studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) to assess the certainty of evidence. We carried out a random effect meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. For outcomes that could not be meta-analyzed, we performed a descriptive analysis. Results: We identified 16 studies with 11,237 patients, including one RCT, six non-randomized trials, two cohort studies, and seven pre–post studies. The certainty of evidence was low to very low because of the observational study design. QFPD combined with conventional treatment might decrease the time for nucleic acid conversion (MD = −4.78 days, 95% CI: −5.79 to −3.77), shorten the length of hospital stay (MD = −7.95 days, 95% CI: −14.66 to −1.24), shorten the duration of symptoms recovery of fever (MD = −1.51 days, 95% CI: −1.92 to −1.09), cough (MD = −1.64 days, 95% CI: −1.91 to −1.36) and chest CT (MD = −2.23 days, 95% CI: −2.46 to −2.00), improve the overall traditional Chinese medicine symptom scores (MD = 41.58 scores, 95% CI: 32.67 to 50.49), and change the laboratory indexes, such as WBC, AST, and CRP. Conclusion: QFPD combined with conventional treatment might be effective for patients with COVID-19. No serious adverse reactions related to QFPD were observed. Further high-quality studies are still needed in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8387832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83878322021-08-27 Efficacy and Safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Qi Zhu, Hongfei Li, Mengting Liu, Yafei Lai, Honghao Yang, Qiuyu Cao, Xiao Ge, Long Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Qingfei Paidu decoction (QFPD) has been widely used in treating COVID-19 in China. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive and systematic evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of QFPD. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QFPD in patients with COVID-19. Methods: We searched seven databases up to 5 March 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data of interest, and assessed risk of bias. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias of cohort and non-randomized trials. The “Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies With No Control Group” was adopted for controlled pre–post studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) to assess the certainty of evidence. We carried out a random effect meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. For outcomes that could not be meta-analyzed, we performed a descriptive analysis. Results: We identified 16 studies with 11,237 patients, including one RCT, six non-randomized trials, two cohort studies, and seven pre–post studies. The certainty of evidence was low to very low because of the observational study design. QFPD combined with conventional treatment might decrease the time for nucleic acid conversion (MD = −4.78 days, 95% CI: −5.79 to −3.77), shorten the length of hospital stay (MD = −7.95 days, 95% CI: −14.66 to −1.24), shorten the duration of symptoms recovery of fever (MD = −1.51 days, 95% CI: −1.92 to −1.09), cough (MD = −1.64 days, 95% CI: −1.91 to −1.36) and chest CT (MD = −2.23 days, 95% CI: −2.46 to −2.00), improve the overall traditional Chinese medicine symptom scores (MD = 41.58 scores, 95% CI: 32.67 to 50.49), and change the laboratory indexes, such as WBC, AST, and CRP. Conclusion: QFPD combined with conventional treatment might be effective for patients with COVID-19. No serious adverse reactions related to QFPD were observed. Further high-quality studies are still needed in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8387832/ /pubmed/34456720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.688857 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Zhu, Li, Liu, Lai, Yang, Cao and Ge. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Wang, Qi
Zhu, Hongfei
Li, Mengting
Liu, Yafei
Lai, Honghao
Yang, Qiuyu
Cao, Xiao
Ge, Long
Efficacy and Safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of qingfei paidu decoction for treating covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34456720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.688857
work_keys_str_mv AT wangqi efficacyandsafetyofqingfeipaidudecoctionfortreatingcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuhongfei efficacyandsafetyofqingfeipaidudecoctionfortreatingcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limengting efficacyandsafetyofqingfeipaidudecoctionfortreatingcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyafei efficacyandsafetyofqingfeipaidudecoctionfortreatingcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT laihonghao efficacyandsafetyofqingfeipaidudecoctionfortreatingcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangqiuyu efficacyandsafetyofqingfeipaidudecoctionfortreatingcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caoxiao efficacyandsafetyofqingfeipaidudecoctionfortreatingcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gelong efficacyandsafetyofqingfeipaidudecoctionfortreatingcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis