Cargando…

Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review

OBJECTIVES: Our recent systematic review determined that remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions can reduce acute care use. However, effectiveness varied within and between populations. Clinicians, researchers, and policymakers require more than evidence of effect; they need guidance on how be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Emma E, Taylor, Monica L, Banbury, Annie, Snoswell, Centaine L, Haydon, Helen M, Gallegos Rejas, Victor M, Smith, Anthony C, Caffery, Liam J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8388293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34433611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051844
_version_ 1783742610621333504
author Thomas, Emma E
Taylor, Monica L
Banbury, Annie
Snoswell, Centaine L
Haydon, Helen M
Gallegos Rejas, Victor M
Smith, Anthony C
Caffery, Liam J
author_facet Thomas, Emma E
Taylor, Monica L
Banbury, Annie
Snoswell, Centaine L
Haydon, Helen M
Gallegos Rejas, Victor M
Smith, Anthony C
Caffery, Liam J
author_sort Thomas, Emma E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our recent systematic review determined that remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions can reduce acute care use. However, effectiveness varied within and between populations. Clinicians, researchers, and policymakers require more than evidence of effect; they need guidance on how best to design and implement RPM interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to explore these results further to (1) identify factors of RPM interventions that relate to increased and decreased acute care use and (2) develop recommendations for future RPM interventions. DESIGN: Realist review—a qualitative systematic review method which aims to identify and explain why intervention results vary in different situations. We analysed secondarily 91 studies included in our previous systematic review that reported on RPM interventions and the impact on acute care use. Online databases PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched in October 2020. Included studies were published in English during 2015–2020 and used RPM to monitor an individual’s biometric data (eg, heart rate, blood pressure) from a distance. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Contextual factors and potential mechanisms that led to variation in acute care use (hospitalisations, length of stay or emergency department presentations). RESULTS: Across a range of RPM interventions 31 factors emerged that impact the effectiveness of RPM innovations on acute care use. These were synthesised into six theories of intervention success: (1) targeting populations at high risk; (2) accurately detecting a decline in health; (3) providing responsive and timely care; (4) personalising care; (5) enhancing self-management, and (6) ensuring collaborative and coordinated care. CONCLUSION: While RPM interventions are complex, if they are designed with patients, providers and the implementation setting in mind and incorporate the key variables identified within this review, it is more likely that they will be effective at reducing acute hospital events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020142523.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8388293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83882932021-09-22 Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review Thomas, Emma E Taylor, Monica L Banbury, Annie Snoswell, Centaine L Haydon, Helen M Gallegos Rejas, Victor M Smith, Anthony C Caffery, Liam J BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: Our recent systematic review determined that remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions can reduce acute care use. However, effectiveness varied within and between populations. Clinicians, researchers, and policymakers require more than evidence of effect; they need guidance on how best to design and implement RPM interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to explore these results further to (1) identify factors of RPM interventions that relate to increased and decreased acute care use and (2) develop recommendations for future RPM interventions. DESIGN: Realist review—a qualitative systematic review method which aims to identify and explain why intervention results vary in different situations. We analysed secondarily 91 studies included in our previous systematic review that reported on RPM interventions and the impact on acute care use. Online databases PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched in October 2020. Included studies were published in English during 2015–2020 and used RPM to monitor an individual’s biometric data (eg, heart rate, blood pressure) from a distance. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Contextual factors and potential mechanisms that led to variation in acute care use (hospitalisations, length of stay or emergency department presentations). RESULTS: Across a range of RPM interventions 31 factors emerged that impact the effectiveness of RPM innovations on acute care use. These were synthesised into six theories of intervention success: (1) targeting populations at high risk; (2) accurately detecting a decline in health; (3) providing responsive and timely care; (4) personalising care; (5) enhancing self-management, and (6) ensuring collaborative and coordinated care. CONCLUSION: While RPM interventions are complex, if they are designed with patients, providers and the implementation setting in mind and incorporate the key variables identified within this review, it is more likely that they will be effective at reducing acute hospital events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020142523. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8388293/ /pubmed/34433611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051844 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Thomas, Emma E
Taylor, Monica L
Banbury, Annie
Snoswell, Centaine L
Haydon, Helen M
Gallegos Rejas, Victor M
Smith, Anthony C
Caffery, Liam J
Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review
title Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review
title_full Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review
title_fullStr Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review
title_short Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review
title_sort factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8388293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34433611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051844
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasemmae factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofremotepatientmonitoringinterventionsarealistreview
AT taylormonical factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofremotepatientmonitoringinterventionsarealistreview
AT banburyannie factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofremotepatientmonitoringinterventionsarealistreview
AT snoswellcentainel factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofremotepatientmonitoringinterventionsarealistreview
AT haydonhelenm factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofremotepatientmonitoringinterventionsarealistreview
AT gallegosrejasvictorm factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofremotepatientmonitoringinterventionsarealistreview
AT smithanthonyc factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofremotepatientmonitoringinterventionsarealistreview
AT cafferyliamj factorsinfluencingtheeffectivenessofremotepatientmonitoringinterventionsarealistreview