Cargando…

Antimicrobial Resistance in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): A Comparison between Clinical and Commensal Bacterial Isolates

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Gram negative organisms are frequently isolated from Caretta caretta and may contribute to the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. In this study, commensal bacteria isolated from oral and cloacal samples of 98 healthy C. caretta were compared to clinical isolates isolated from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trotta, Adriana, Marinaro, Mariarosaria, Sposato, Alessio, Galgano, Michela, Ciccarelli, Stefano, Paci, Serena, Corrente, Marialaura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8388645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34438892
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11082435
_version_ 1783742683425013760
author Trotta, Adriana
Marinaro, Mariarosaria
Sposato, Alessio
Galgano, Michela
Ciccarelli, Stefano
Paci, Serena
Corrente, Marialaura
author_facet Trotta, Adriana
Marinaro, Mariarosaria
Sposato, Alessio
Galgano, Michela
Ciccarelli, Stefano
Paci, Serena
Corrente, Marialaura
author_sort Trotta, Adriana
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Gram negative organisms are frequently isolated from Caretta caretta and may contribute to the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. In this study, commensal bacteria isolated from oral and cloacal samples of 98 healthy C. caretta were compared to clinical isolates isolated from the wounds of 102 injured animals, in order to investigate the presence of antimicrobial resistance bacteria in free-living loggerheads from the Adriatic Sea. A total of 410 bacteria were cultured and differences were noted in the isolated genera, as some of them were isolated only in healthy animals, while others were isolated only from injured animals. When tested for susceptibility to antimicrobials, clinical isolates showed highly significant differences in the antimicrobial resistance rates vs. commensal isolates for all the drugs tested, except for doxycycline. The detection of high antimicrobial resistance rates in loggerhead sea turtles is of clinical and microbiological significance since it impacts both the choice of a proper antibiotic therapy and the implementation of conservation programs. ABSTRACT: Gram negative organisms are frequently isolated from Caretta caretta turtles, which can act as reservoir species for resistant microorganisms in the aquatic environment. C. caretta, which have no history of treatment with antimicrobials, are useful sentinel species for resistant microbes. In this culture-based study, commensal bacteria isolated from oral and cloacal samples of 98 healthy C. caretta were compared to clinical isolates from the wounds of 102 injured animals, in order to investigate the presence of AMR bacteria in free-living loggerheads from the Adriatic Sea. A total of 410 isolates were cultured. Escherichia coli and genera such as Serratia, Moraxella, Kluyvera, Salmonella were isolated only in healthy animals, while Acinetobacter, Enterobacter, Klebsiella and Morganella were isolated only from the wounds of the injured animals. When tested for susceptibility to ampicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, gentamicin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin, the clinical isolates showed highly significant differences in AMR rates vs. commensal isolates for all the drugs tested, except for doxycycline. The detection of high AMR rates in loggerheads is of clinical and microbiological significance since it impacts both the choice of a proper antibiotic therapy and the implementation of conservation programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8388645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83886452021-08-27 Antimicrobial Resistance in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): A Comparison between Clinical and Commensal Bacterial Isolates Trotta, Adriana Marinaro, Mariarosaria Sposato, Alessio Galgano, Michela Ciccarelli, Stefano Paci, Serena Corrente, Marialaura Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Gram negative organisms are frequently isolated from Caretta caretta and may contribute to the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. In this study, commensal bacteria isolated from oral and cloacal samples of 98 healthy C. caretta were compared to clinical isolates isolated from the wounds of 102 injured animals, in order to investigate the presence of antimicrobial resistance bacteria in free-living loggerheads from the Adriatic Sea. A total of 410 bacteria were cultured and differences were noted in the isolated genera, as some of them were isolated only in healthy animals, while others were isolated only from injured animals. When tested for susceptibility to antimicrobials, clinical isolates showed highly significant differences in the antimicrobial resistance rates vs. commensal isolates for all the drugs tested, except for doxycycline. The detection of high antimicrobial resistance rates in loggerhead sea turtles is of clinical and microbiological significance since it impacts both the choice of a proper antibiotic therapy and the implementation of conservation programs. ABSTRACT: Gram negative organisms are frequently isolated from Caretta caretta turtles, which can act as reservoir species for resistant microorganisms in the aquatic environment. C. caretta, which have no history of treatment with antimicrobials, are useful sentinel species for resistant microbes. In this culture-based study, commensal bacteria isolated from oral and cloacal samples of 98 healthy C. caretta were compared to clinical isolates from the wounds of 102 injured animals, in order to investigate the presence of AMR bacteria in free-living loggerheads from the Adriatic Sea. A total of 410 isolates were cultured. Escherichia coli and genera such as Serratia, Moraxella, Kluyvera, Salmonella were isolated only in healthy animals, while Acinetobacter, Enterobacter, Klebsiella and Morganella were isolated only from the wounds of the injured animals. When tested for susceptibility to ampicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, gentamicin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin, the clinical isolates showed highly significant differences in AMR rates vs. commensal isolates for all the drugs tested, except for doxycycline. The detection of high AMR rates in loggerheads is of clinical and microbiological significance since it impacts both the choice of a proper antibiotic therapy and the implementation of conservation programs. MDPI 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8388645/ /pubmed/34438892 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11082435 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Trotta, Adriana
Marinaro, Mariarosaria
Sposato, Alessio
Galgano, Michela
Ciccarelli, Stefano
Paci, Serena
Corrente, Marialaura
Antimicrobial Resistance in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): A Comparison between Clinical and Commensal Bacterial Isolates
title Antimicrobial Resistance in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): A Comparison between Clinical and Commensal Bacterial Isolates
title_full Antimicrobial Resistance in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): A Comparison between Clinical and Commensal Bacterial Isolates
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Resistance in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): A Comparison between Clinical and Commensal Bacterial Isolates
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Resistance in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): A Comparison between Clinical and Commensal Bacterial Isolates
title_short Antimicrobial Resistance in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): A Comparison between Clinical and Commensal Bacterial Isolates
title_sort antimicrobial resistance in loggerhead sea turtles (caretta caretta): a comparison between clinical and commensal bacterial isolates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8388645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34438892
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11082435
work_keys_str_mv AT trottaadriana antimicrobialresistanceinloggerheadseaturtlescarettacarettaacomparisonbetweenclinicalandcommensalbacterialisolates
AT marinaromariarosaria antimicrobialresistanceinloggerheadseaturtlescarettacarettaacomparisonbetweenclinicalandcommensalbacterialisolates
AT sposatoalessio antimicrobialresistanceinloggerheadseaturtlescarettacarettaacomparisonbetweenclinicalandcommensalbacterialisolates
AT galganomichela antimicrobialresistanceinloggerheadseaturtlescarettacarettaacomparisonbetweenclinicalandcommensalbacterialisolates
AT ciccarellistefano antimicrobialresistanceinloggerheadseaturtlescarettacarettaacomparisonbetweenclinicalandcommensalbacterialisolates
AT paciserena antimicrobialresistanceinloggerheadseaturtlescarettacarettaacomparisonbetweenclinicalandcommensalbacterialisolates
AT correntemarialaura antimicrobialresistanceinloggerheadseaturtlescarettacarettaacomparisonbetweenclinicalandcommensalbacterialisolates