Cargando…

Experiences from six years of quality assured Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) diagnostics

BACKGROUND: The model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was established for the allocation of liver transplants. The score is based on the medical laboratory parameters: bilirubin, creatinine and the international normalized ratio (INR). A verification algorithm for the laboratory MELD diagnos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hunold, Pascal, Berg, Thomas, Seehofer, Daniel, Sucher, Robert, Herber, Adam, Isermann, Berend, Thiery, Joachim, Kaiser, Thorsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254219
_version_ 1783742843460780032
author Hunold, Pascal
Berg, Thomas
Seehofer, Daniel
Sucher, Robert
Herber, Adam
Isermann, Berend
Thiery, Joachim
Kaiser, Thorsten
author_facet Hunold, Pascal
Berg, Thomas
Seehofer, Daniel
Sucher, Robert
Herber, Adam
Isermann, Berend
Thiery, Joachim
Kaiser, Thorsten
author_sort Hunold, Pascal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was established for the allocation of liver transplants. The score is based on the medical laboratory parameters: bilirubin, creatinine and the international normalized ratio (INR). A verification algorithm for the laboratory MELD diagnostic was established, and the results from the first six years were analyzed. METHODS: We systematically investigated the validity of 7,270 MELD scores during a six-year period. The MELD score was electronically requested by the clinical physician using the laboratory system and calculated and specifically validated by the laboratory physician in the context of previous and additional diagnostics. RESULTS: In 2.7% (193 of 7,270) of the cases, MELD diagnostics did not fulfill the specified quality criteria. After consultation with the sender, 2.0% (145) of the MELD scores remained invalid for different reasons and could not be reported to the transplant organization. No cases of deliberate misreporting were identified. In 34 cases the dialysis status had to be corrected and there were 24 cases of oral anticoagulation with impact on MELD diagnostics. CONCLUSION: Our verification algorithm for MELD diagnostics effectively prevented invalid MELD results and could be adopted by transplant centers to prevent diagnostic errors with possible adverse effects on organ allocation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8389365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83893652021-08-27 Experiences from six years of quality assured Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) diagnostics Hunold, Pascal Berg, Thomas Seehofer, Daniel Sucher, Robert Herber, Adam Isermann, Berend Thiery, Joachim Kaiser, Thorsten PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was established for the allocation of liver transplants. The score is based on the medical laboratory parameters: bilirubin, creatinine and the international normalized ratio (INR). A verification algorithm for the laboratory MELD diagnostic was established, and the results from the first six years were analyzed. METHODS: We systematically investigated the validity of 7,270 MELD scores during a six-year period. The MELD score was electronically requested by the clinical physician using the laboratory system and calculated and specifically validated by the laboratory physician in the context of previous and additional diagnostics. RESULTS: In 2.7% (193 of 7,270) of the cases, MELD diagnostics did not fulfill the specified quality criteria. After consultation with the sender, 2.0% (145) of the MELD scores remained invalid for different reasons and could not be reported to the transplant organization. No cases of deliberate misreporting were identified. In 34 cases the dialysis status had to be corrected and there were 24 cases of oral anticoagulation with impact on MELD diagnostics. CONCLUSION: Our verification algorithm for MELD diagnostics effectively prevented invalid MELD results and could be adopted by transplant centers to prevent diagnostic errors with possible adverse effects on organ allocation. Public Library of Science 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8389365/ /pubmed/34437537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254219 Text en © 2021 Hunold et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hunold, Pascal
Berg, Thomas
Seehofer, Daniel
Sucher, Robert
Herber, Adam
Isermann, Berend
Thiery, Joachim
Kaiser, Thorsten
Experiences from six years of quality assured Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) diagnostics
title Experiences from six years of quality assured Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) diagnostics
title_full Experiences from six years of quality assured Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) diagnostics
title_fullStr Experiences from six years of quality assured Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Experiences from six years of quality assured Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) diagnostics
title_short Experiences from six years of quality assured Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) diagnostics
title_sort experiences from six years of quality assured model of end stage liver disease (meld) diagnostics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254219
work_keys_str_mv AT hunoldpascal experiencesfromsixyearsofqualityassuredmodelofendstageliverdiseasemelddiagnostics
AT bergthomas experiencesfromsixyearsofqualityassuredmodelofendstageliverdiseasemelddiagnostics
AT seehoferdaniel experiencesfromsixyearsofqualityassuredmodelofendstageliverdiseasemelddiagnostics
AT sucherrobert experiencesfromsixyearsofqualityassuredmodelofendstageliverdiseasemelddiagnostics
AT herberadam experiencesfromsixyearsofqualityassuredmodelofendstageliverdiseasemelddiagnostics
AT isermannberend experiencesfromsixyearsofqualityassuredmodelofendstageliverdiseasemelddiagnostics
AT thieryjoachim experiencesfromsixyearsofqualityassuredmodelofendstageliverdiseasemelddiagnostics
AT kaiserthorsten experiencesfromsixyearsofqualityassuredmodelofendstageliverdiseasemelddiagnostics