Cargando…

Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress

Affective sharing is a bottom-up process involving automatic processing of sensory inputs that facilitate vicarious experience of another’s emotional state. It is grounded directly in the prior experiences of the perceiver. In adults, vicarious ratings of affective touch match the known velocity tun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haggarty, Connor J., Trotter, Paula D., McGlone, Francis, Walker, Susannah C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256303
_version_ 1783742862750384128
author Haggarty, Connor J.
Trotter, Paula D.
McGlone, Francis
Walker, Susannah C.
author_facet Haggarty, Connor J.
Trotter, Paula D.
McGlone, Francis
Walker, Susannah C.
author_sort Haggarty, Connor J.
collection PubMed
description Affective sharing is a bottom-up process involving automatic processing of sensory inputs that facilitate vicarious experience of another’s emotional state. It is grounded directly in the prior experiences of the perceiver. In adults, vicarious ratings of affective touch match the known velocity tuning and hypothesised anatomical distribution of C-tactile afferents (CT), a subclass of C-fibre which respond preferentially to low force/velocity stroking touch, typically perceived as pleasant. Given the centrality of touch to early nurturing interactions, here we examined whether primary school aged children’s vicarious ratings of affective touch show the same anatomical and velocity specific patterns reported in adults. Forty-four children aged between 8 and 11 (mean age 9, 24 male) rated a sequence of video clips depicting one individual being touched by another on 5 different upper-body sites (palm, dorsal forearm, ventral forearm, upper-arm and back) at 3 different velocities (static, CT optimal, slow stroking and non-CT optimal, fast stroking). Immediately after viewing each clip, participants were asked to rate how pleasant they perceived the touch to be. While children rated the CT optimal velocity significantly higher than static or non-CT optimal touch, unlike adults their ratings did not vary across skin sites. This difference may reflect the fact children’s ratings are grounded in bottom-up affective resonance while adults also draw on top-down cognitive evaluation of the broader social context when rating the stimuli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8389448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83894482021-08-27 Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress Haggarty, Connor J. Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis Walker, Susannah C. PLoS One Research Article Affective sharing is a bottom-up process involving automatic processing of sensory inputs that facilitate vicarious experience of another’s emotional state. It is grounded directly in the prior experiences of the perceiver. In adults, vicarious ratings of affective touch match the known velocity tuning and hypothesised anatomical distribution of C-tactile afferents (CT), a subclass of C-fibre which respond preferentially to low force/velocity stroking touch, typically perceived as pleasant. Given the centrality of touch to early nurturing interactions, here we examined whether primary school aged children’s vicarious ratings of affective touch show the same anatomical and velocity specific patterns reported in adults. Forty-four children aged between 8 and 11 (mean age 9, 24 male) rated a sequence of video clips depicting one individual being touched by another on 5 different upper-body sites (palm, dorsal forearm, ventral forearm, upper-arm and back) at 3 different velocities (static, CT optimal, slow stroking and non-CT optimal, fast stroking). Immediately after viewing each clip, participants were asked to rate how pleasant they perceived the touch to be. While children rated the CT optimal velocity significantly higher than static or non-CT optimal touch, unlike adults their ratings did not vary across skin sites. This difference may reflect the fact children’s ratings are grounded in bottom-up affective resonance while adults also draw on top-down cognitive evaluation of the broader social context when rating the stimuli. Public Library of Science 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8389448/ /pubmed/34437583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256303 Text en © 2021 Haggarty et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haggarty, Connor J.
Trotter, Paula D.
McGlone, Francis
Walker, Susannah C.
Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress
title Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress
title_full Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress
title_fullStr Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress
title_full_unstemmed Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress
title_short Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress
title_sort children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256303
work_keys_str_mv AT haggartyconnorj childrensvicariousratingsofsocialtoucharetunedtothevelocitybutnotthelocationofacaress
AT trotterpaulad childrensvicariousratingsofsocialtoucharetunedtothevelocitybutnotthelocationofacaress
AT mcglonefrancis childrensvicariousratingsofsocialtoucharetunedtothevelocitybutnotthelocationofacaress
AT walkersusannahc childrensvicariousratingsofsocialtoucharetunedtothevelocitybutnotthelocationofacaress