Cargando…
Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress
Affective sharing is a bottom-up process involving automatic processing of sensory inputs that facilitate vicarious experience of another’s emotional state. It is grounded directly in the prior experiences of the perceiver. In adults, vicarious ratings of affective touch match the known velocity tun...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256303 |
_version_ | 1783742862750384128 |
---|---|
author | Haggarty, Connor J. Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis Walker, Susannah C. |
author_facet | Haggarty, Connor J. Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis Walker, Susannah C. |
author_sort | Haggarty, Connor J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Affective sharing is a bottom-up process involving automatic processing of sensory inputs that facilitate vicarious experience of another’s emotional state. It is grounded directly in the prior experiences of the perceiver. In adults, vicarious ratings of affective touch match the known velocity tuning and hypothesised anatomical distribution of C-tactile afferents (CT), a subclass of C-fibre which respond preferentially to low force/velocity stroking touch, typically perceived as pleasant. Given the centrality of touch to early nurturing interactions, here we examined whether primary school aged children’s vicarious ratings of affective touch show the same anatomical and velocity specific patterns reported in adults. Forty-four children aged between 8 and 11 (mean age 9, 24 male) rated a sequence of video clips depicting one individual being touched by another on 5 different upper-body sites (palm, dorsal forearm, ventral forearm, upper-arm and back) at 3 different velocities (static, CT optimal, slow stroking and non-CT optimal, fast stroking). Immediately after viewing each clip, participants were asked to rate how pleasant they perceived the touch to be. While children rated the CT optimal velocity significantly higher than static or non-CT optimal touch, unlike adults their ratings did not vary across skin sites. This difference may reflect the fact children’s ratings are grounded in bottom-up affective resonance while adults also draw on top-down cognitive evaluation of the broader social context when rating the stimuli. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8389448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83894482021-08-27 Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress Haggarty, Connor J. Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis Walker, Susannah C. PLoS One Research Article Affective sharing is a bottom-up process involving automatic processing of sensory inputs that facilitate vicarious experience of another’s emotional state. It is grounded directly in the prior experiences of the perceiver. In adults, vicarious ratings of affective touch match the known velocity tuning and hypothesised anatomical distribution of C-tactile afferents (CT), a subclass of C-fibre which respond preferentially to low force/velocity stroking touch, typically perceived as pleasant. Given the centrality of touch to early nurturing interactions, here we examined whether primary school aged children’s vicarious ratings of affective touch show the same anatomical and velocity specific patterns reported in adults. Forty-four children aged between 8 and 11 (mean age 9, 24 male) rated a sequence of video clips depicting one individual being touched by another on 5 different upper-body sites (palm, dorsal forearm, ventral forearm, upper-arm and back) at 3 different velocities (static, CT optimal, slow stroking and non-CT optimal, fast stroking). Immediately after viewing each clip, participants were asked to rate how pleasant they perceived the touch to be. While children rated the CT optimal velocity significantly higher than static or non-CT optimal touch, unlike adults their ratings did not vary across skin sites. This difference may reflect the fact children’s ratings are grounded in bottom-up affective resonance while adults also draw on top-down cognitive evaluation of the broader social context when rating the stimuli. Public Library of Science 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8389448/ /pubmed/34437583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256303 Text en © 2021 Haggarty et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Haggarty, Connor J. Trotter, Paula D. McGlone, Francis Walker, Susannah C. Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress |
title | Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress |
title_full | Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress |
title_fullStr | Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress |
title_full_unstemmed | Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress |
title_short | Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress |
title_sort | children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haggartyconnorj childrensvicariousratingsofsocialtoucharetunedtothevelocitybutnotthelocationofacaress AT trotterpaulad childrensvicariousratingsofsocialtoucharetunedtothevelocitybutnotthelocationofacaress AT mcglonefrancis childrensvicariousratingsofsocialtoucharetunedtothevelocitybutnotthelocationofacaress AT walkersusannahc childrensvicariousratingsofsocialtoucharetunedtothevelocitybutnotthelocationofacaress |