Cargando…
A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease
Identifying people with Parkinson disease during the prodromal period, including via algorithms in administrative claims data, is an important research and clinical priority. We sought to improve upon an existing penalized logistic regression model, based on diagnosis and procedure codes, by adding...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256592 |
_version_ | 1783742868340342784 |
---|---|
author | Warden, Mark N. Searles Nielsen, Susan Camacho-Soto, Alejandra Garnett, Roman Racette, Brad A. |
author_facet | Warden, Mark N. Searles Nielsen, Susan Camacho-Soto, Alejandra Garnett, Roman Racette, Brad A. |
author_sort | Warden, Mark N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identifying people with Parkinson disease during the prodromal period, including via algorithms in administrative claims data, is an important research and clinical priority. We sought to improve upon an existing penalized logistic regression model, based on diagnosis and procedure codes, by adding prescription medication data or using machine learning. Using Medicare Part D beneficiaries age 66–90 from a population-based case-control study of incident Parkinson disease, we fit a penalized logistic regression both with and without Part D data. We also built a predictive algorithm using a random forest classifier for comparison. In a combined approach, we introduced the probability of Parkinson disease from the random forest, as a predictor in the penalized regression model. We calculated the receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for each model. All models performed well, with AUCs ranging from 0.824 (simplest model) to 0.835 (combined approach). We conclude that medication data and random forests improve Parkinson disease prediction, but are not essential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8389479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83894792021-08-27 A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease Warden, Mark N. Searles Nielsen, Susan Camacho-Soto, Alejandra Garnett, Roman Racette, Brad A. PLoS One Research Article Identifying people with Parkinson disease during the prodromal period, including via algorithms in administrative claims data, is an important research and clinical priority. We sought to improve upon an existing penalized logistic regression model, based on diagnosis and procedure codes, by adding prescription medication data or using machine learning. Using Medicare Part D beneficiaries age 66–90 from a population-based case-control study of incident Parkinson disease, we fit a penalized logistic regression both with and without Part D data. We also built a predictive algorithm using a random forest classifier for comparison. In a combined approach, we introduced the probability of Parkinson disease from the random forest, as a predictor in the penalized regression model. We calculated the receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for each model. All models performed well, with AUCs ranging from 0.824 (simplest model) to 0.835 (combined approach). We conclude that medication data and random forests improve Parkinson disease prediction, but are not essential. Public Library of Science 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8389479/ /pubmed/34437600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256592 Text en © 2021 Warden et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Warden, Mark N. Searles Nielsen, Susan Camacho-Soto, Alejandra Garnett, Roman Racette, Brad A. A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease |
title | A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease |
title_full | A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease |
title_fullStr | A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease |
title_short | A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease |
title_sort | comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal parkinson disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256592 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wardenmarkn acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease AT searlesnielsensusan acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease AT camachosotoalejandra acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease AT garnettroman acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease AT racettebrada acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease AT wardenmarkn comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease AT searlesnielsensusan comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease AT camachosotoalejandra comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease AT garnettroman comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease AT racettebrada comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease |