Cargando…

A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease

Identifying people with Parkinson disease during the prodromal period, including via algorithms in administrative claims data, is an important research and clinical priority. We sought to improve upon an existing penalized logistic regression model, based on diagnosis and procedure codes, by adding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warden, Mark N., Searles Nielsen, Susan, Camacho-Soto, Alejandra, Garnett, Roman, Racette, Brad A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256592
_version_ 1783742868340342784
author Warden, Mark N.
Searles Nielsen, Susan
Camacho-Soto, Alejandra
Garnett, Roman
Racette, Brad A.
author_facet Warden, Mark N.
Searles Nielsen, Susan
Camacho-Soto, Alejandra
Garnett, Roman
Racette, Brad A.
author_sort Warden, Mark N.
collection PubMed
description Identifying people with Parkinson disease during the prodromal period, including via algorithms in administrative claims data, is an important research and clinical priority. We sought to improve upon an existing penalized logistic regression model, based on diagnosis and procedure codes, by adding prescription medication data or using machine learning. Using Medicare Part D beneficiaries age 66–90 from a population-based case-control study of incident Parkinson disease, we fit a penalized logistic regression both with and without Part D data. We also built a predictive algorithm using a random forest classifier for comparison. In a combined approach, we introduced the probability of Parkinson disease from the random forest, as a predictor in the penalized regression model. We calculated the receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for each model. All models performed well, with AUCs ranging from 0.824 (simplest model) to 0.835 (combined approach). We conclude that medication data and random forests improve Parkinson disease prediction, but are not essential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8389479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83894792021-08-27 A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease Warden, Mark N. Searles Nielsen, Susan Camacho-Soto, Alejandra Garnett, Roman Racette, Brad A. PLoS One Research Article Identifying people with Parkinson disease during the prodromal period, including via algorithms in administrative claims data, is an important research and clinical priority. We sought to improve upon an existing penalized logistic regression model, based on diagnosis and procedure codes, by adding prescription medication data or using machine learning. Using Medicare Part D beneficiaries age 66–90 from a population-based case-control study of incident Parkinson disease, we fit a penalized logistic regression both with and without Part D data. We also built a predictive algorithm using a random forest classifier for comparison. In a combined approach, we introduced the probability of Parkinson disease from the random forest, as a predictor in the penalized regression model. We calculated the receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for each model. All models performed well, with AUCs ranging from 0.824 (simplest model) to 0.835 (combined approach). We conclude that medication data and random forests improve Parkinson disease prediction, but are not essential. Public Library of Science 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8389479/ /pubmed/34437600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256592 Text en © 2021 Warden et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Warden, Mark N.
Searles Nielsen, Susan
Camacho-Soto, Alejandra
Garnett, Roman
Racette, Brad A.
A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease
title A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease
title_full A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease
title_fullStr A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease
title_short A comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal Parkinson disease
title_sort comparison of prediction approaches for identifying prodromal parkinson disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256592
work_keys_str_mv AT wardenmarkn acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease
AT searlesnielsensusan acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease
AT camachosotoalejandra acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease
AT garnettroman acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease
AT racettebrada acomparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease
AT wardenmarkn comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease
AT searlesnielsensusan comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease
AT camachosotoalejandra comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease
AT garnettroman comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease
AT racettebrada comparisonofpredictionapproachesforidentifyingprodromalparkinsondisease