Cargando…

Egg Incubation Mechanics of Giant Birds

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Extinct giant birds have been a source of imagination, and knowledge of their incubation mechanics is crucial to our understanding of the evolution of avian reproduction. Despite the extensive studies on avian eggs, our understanding of the eggshell mechanics of giant birds, particul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yen, An, Wu, Hsiao-Jou, Chen, Pin-Yi, Yu, Hon-Tsen, Juang, Jia-Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34439970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10080738
_version_ 1783742896432742400
author Yen, An
Wu, Hsiao-Jou
Chen, Pin-Yi
Yu, Hon-Tsen
Juang, Jia-Yang
author_facet Yen, An
Wu, Hsiao-Jou
Chen, Pin-Yi
Yu, Hon-Tsen
Juang, Jia-Yang
author_sort Yen, An
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Extinct giant birds have been a source of imagination, and knowledge of their incubation mechanics is crucial to our understanding of the evolution of avian reproduction. Despite the extensive studies on avian eggs, our understanding of the eggshell mechanics of giant birds, particularly the extinct ones, remains incomplete—most of these prior works were based on empirical or allometric relationships with limited quantitative analysis. In the present study, with the help of advanced three-dimensional computer simulation using data from published fossil records, we obtain more comprehensive quantitative analysis to answer important questions related to contact incubation of giant birds. Specifically, how much safety margin does the reversed sexual size dimorphism (RSSD) of moas provide? What is the theoretical upper limit of body mass for contact incubation? Is the Williams’ egg, or the putative Genyornis oological material (PGOM), really the egg of the extinct giant bird Genyornis newtoni, as commonly accepted since its discovery in 1981? ABSTRACT: Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to conduct mechanical analyses on eggshells of giant birds, and relate this to the evolution and reproductive behavior of avian species. We aim to (1) investigate mechanical characteristics of eggshell structures of various ratite species, enabling comparisons between species with or without reversed sexual size dimorphism (RSSD); (2) quantify the safety margin provided by RSSD; (3) determine whether the Williams’ egg can have been incubated by an extinct giant bird Genyornis newtoni; (4) determine the theoretical maximum body mass for contact incubation. We use a dimensionless number C to quantify relative shell stiffness with respect to the egg size, allowing for comparison across wide body masses. We find that RSSD in moas significantly increases the safety margin of contact incubation by the lighter males. However, their safety margins are still smaller than those of the moa species without RSSD. Two different strategies were adopted by giant birds—one is RSSD and thinner shells, represented by some moa species; the other is no RSSD and regular shells, represented by the giant elephant bird. Finally, we predicted that the upper limit of body mass for contact incubation was 2000 kg.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8389601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83896012021-08-27 Egg Incubation Mechanics of Giant Birds Yen, An Wu, Hsiao-Jou Chen, Pin-Yi Yu, Hon-Tsen Juang, Jia-Yang Biology (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Extinct giant birds have been a source of imagination, and knowledge of their incubation mechanics is crucial to our understanding of the evolution of avian reproduction. Despite the extensive studies on avian eggs, our understanding of the eggshell mechanics of giant birds, particularly the extinct ones, remains incomplete—most of these prior works were based on empirical or allometric relationships with limited quantitative analysis. In the present study, with the help of advanced three-dimensional computer simulation using data from published fossil records, we obtain more comprehensive quantitative analysis to answer important questions related to contact incubation of giant birds. Specifically, how much safety margin does the reversed sexual size dimorphism (RSSD) of moas provide? What is the theoretical upper limit of body mass for contact incubation? Is the Williams’ egg, or the putative Genyornis oological material (PGOM), really the egg of the extinct giant bird Genyornis newtoni, as commonly accepted since its discovery in 1981? ABSTRACT: Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to conduct mechanical analyses on eggshells of giant birds, and relate this to the evolution and reproductive behavior of avian species. We aim to (1) investigate mechanical characteristics of eggshell structures of various ratite species, enabling comparisons between species with or without reversed sexual size dimorphism (RSSD); (2) quantify the safety margin provided by RSSD; (3) determine whether the Williams’ egg can have been incubated by an extinct giant bird Genyornis newtoni; (4) determine the theoretical maximum body mass for contact incubation. We use a dimensionless number C to quantify relative shell stiffness with respect to the egg size, allowing for comparison across wide body masses. We find that RSSD in moas significantly increases the safety margin of contact incubation by the lighter males. However, their safety margins are still smaller than those of the moa species without RSSD. Two different strategies were adopted by giant birds—one is RSSD and thinner shells, represented by some moa species; the other is no RSSD and regular shells, represented by the giant elephant bird. Finally, we predicted that the upper limit of body mass for contact incubation was 2000 kg. MDPI 2021-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8389601/ /pubmed/34439970 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10080738 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yen, An
Wu, Hsiao-Jou
Chen, Pin-Yi
Yu, Hon-Tsen
Juang, Jia-Yang
Egg Incubation Mechanics of Giant Birds
title Egg Incubation Mechanics of Giant Birds
title_full Egg Incubation Mechanics of Giant Birds
title_fullStr Egg Incubation Mechanics of Giant Birds
title_full_unstemmed Egg Incubation Mechanics of Giant Birds
title_short Egg Incubation Mechanics of Giant Birds
title_sort egg incubation mechanics of giant birds
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34439970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10080738
work_keys_str_mv AT yenan eggincubationmechanicsofgiantbirds
AT wuhsiaojou eggincubationmechanicsofgiantbirds
AT chenpinyi eggincubationmechanicsofgiantbirds
AT yuhontsen eggincubationmechanicsofgiantbirds
AT juangjiayang eggincubationmechanicsofgiantbirds