Cargando…

Natural Pest Regulation and Its Compatibility with Other Crop Protection Practices in Smallholder Bean Farming Systems

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Bean production by smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa is frequently constrained by insect pests, two of the most serious being Maruca vitrata and Aphis fabae. For many bean farmers, the options available to control these pests are limited. A few can access synthetic insecticid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ndakidemi, Baltazar J., Mbega, Ernest R., Ndakidemi, Patrick A., Stevenson, Philip C., Belmain, Steven R., Arnold, Sarah E. J., Woolley, Victoria C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34440037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10080805
_version_ 1783742916312694784
author Ndakidemi, Baltazar J.
Mbega, Ernest R.
Ndakidemi, Patrick A.
Stevenson, Philip C.
Belmain, Steven R.
Arnold, Sarah E. J.
Woolley, Victoria C.
author_facet Ndakidemi, Baltazar J.
Mbega, Ernest R.
Ndakidemi, Patrick A.
Stevenson, Philip C.
Belmain, Steven R.
Arnold, Sarah E. J.
Woolley, Victoria C.
author_sort Ndakidemi, Baltazar J.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Bean production by smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa is frequently constrained by insect pests, two of the most serious being Maruca vitrata and Aphis fabae. For many bean farmers, the options available to control these pests are limited. A few can access synthetic insecticides, but these have negative consequences for their health and the environment. Natural pest regulation (NPR) offers environmentally benign approaches for smallholders to manage bean pests. For example, here, we focus on biological control whereby beneficial organisms predate or parasitize the pests. Field studies show this is a feasible strategy for controlling M. vitrata and A. fabae. In particular, we highlight how compatible biological control is with other NPR options, such as the use of biopesticides (including plant extracts), resistant varieties, and cultural control. We recommend that smallholder farmers consider biological control alongside other NPR strategies for reducing the populations of A. fabae and M. vitrata in the common bean, increasing the yields and reducing the negative impacts of the synthetic pesticides. ABSTRACT: Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) production and storage are limited by numerous constraints. Insect pests are often the most destructive. However, resource-constrained smallholders in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) often do little to manage pests. Where farmers do use a control strategy, it typically relies on chemical pesticides, which have adverse effects on the wildlife, crop pollinators, natural enemies, mammals, and the development of resistance by pests. Nature-based solutions —in particular, using biological control agents with sustainable approaches that include biopesticides, resistant varieties, and cultural tools—are alternatives to chemical control. However, significant barriers to their adoption in SSA include a lack of field data and knowledge on the natural enemies of pests, safety, efficacy, the spectrum of activities, the availability and costs of biopesticides, the lack of sources of resistance for different cultivars, and spatial and temporal inconsistencies for cultural methods. Here, we critically review the control options for bean pests, particularly the black bean aphid (Aphis fabae) and pod borers (Maruca vitrata). We identified natural pest regulation as the option with the greatest potential for this farming system. We recommend that farmers adapt to using biological control due to its compatibility with other sustainable approaches, such as cultural tools, resistant varieties, and biopesticides for effective management, especially in SSA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8389685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83896852021-08-27 Natural Pest Regulation and Its Compatibility with Other Crop Protection Practices in Smallholder Bean Farming Systems Ndakidemi, Baltazar J. Mbega, Ernest R. Ndakidemi, Patrick A. Stevenson, Philip C. Belmain, Steven R. Arnold, Sarah E. J. Woolley, Victoria C. Biology (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Bean production by smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa is frequently constrained by insect pests, two of the most serious being Maruca vitrata and Aphis fabae. For many bean farmers, the options available to control these pests are limited. A few can access synthetic insecticides, but these have negative consequences for their health and the environment. Natural pest regulation (NPR) offers environmentally benign approaches for smallholders to manage bean pests. For example, here, we focus on biological control whereby beneficial organisms predate or parasitize the pests. Field studies show this is a feasible strategy for controlling M. vitrata and A. fabae. In particular, we highlight how compatible biological control is with other NPR options, such as the use of biopesticides (including plant extracts), resistant varieties, and cultural control. We recommend that smallholder farmers consider biological control alongside other NPR strategies for reducing the populations of A. fabae and M. vitrata in the common bean, increasing the yields and reducing the negative impacts of the synthetic pesticides. ABSTRACT: Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) production and storage are limited by numerous constraints. Insect pests are often the most destructive. However, resource-constrained smallholders in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) often do little to manage pests. Where farmers do use a control strategy, it typically relies on chemical pesticides, which have adverse effects on the wildlife, crop pollinators, natural enemies, mammals, and the development of resistance by pests. Nature-based solutions —in particular, using biological control agents with sustainable approaches that include biopesticides, resistant varieties, and cultural tools—are alternatives to chemical control. However, significant barriers to their adoption in SSA include a lack of field data and knowledge on the natural enemies of pests, safety, efficacy, the spectrum of activities, the availability and costs of biopesticides, the lack of sources of resistance for different cultivars, and spatial and temporal inconsistencies for cultural methods. Here, we critically review the control options for bean pests, particularly the black bean aphid (Aphis fabae) and pod borers (Maruca vitrata). We identified natural pest regulation as the option with the greatest potential for this farming system. We recommend that farmers adapt to using biological control due to its compatibility with other sustainable approaches, such as cultural tools, resistant varieties, and biopesticides for effective management, especially in SSA. MDPI 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8389685/ /pubmed/34440037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10080805 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ndakidemi, Baltazar J.
Mbega, Ernest R.
Ndakidemi, Patrick A.
Stevenson, Philip C.
Belmain, Steven R.
Arnold, Sarah E. J.
Woolley, Victoria C.
Natural Pest Regulation and Its Compatibility with Other Crop Protection Practices in Smallholder Bean Farming Systems
title Natural Pest Regulation and Its Compatibility with Other Crop Protection Practices in Smallholder Bean Farming Systems
title_full Natural Pest Regulation and Its Compatibility with Other Crop Protection Practices in Smallholder Bean Farming Systems
title_fullStr Natural Pest Regulation and Its Compatibility with Other Crop Protection Practices in Smallholder Bean Farming Systems
title_full_unstemmed Natural Pest Regulation and Its Compatibility with Other Crop Protection Practices in Smallholder Bean Farming Systems
title_short Natural Pest Regulation and Its Compatibility with Other Crop Protection Practices in Smallholder Bean Farming Systems
title_sort natural pest regulation and its compatibility with other crop protection practices in smallholder bean farming systems
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34440037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10080805
work_keys_str_mv AT ndakidemibaltazarj naturalpestregulationanditscompatibilitywithothercropprotectionpracticesinsmallholderbeanfarmingsystems
AT mbegaernestr naturalpestregulationanditscompatibilitywithothercropprotectionpracticesinsmallholderbeanfarmingsystems
AT ndakidemipatricka naturalpestregulationanditscompatibilitywithothercropprotectionpracticesinsmallholderbeanfarmingsystems
AT stevensonphilipc naturalpestregulationanditscompatibilitywithothercropprotectionpracticesinsmallholderbeanfarmingsystems
AT belmainstevenr naturalpestregulationanditscompatibilitywithothercropprotectionpracticesinsmallholderbeanfarmingsystems
AT arnoldsarahej naturalpestregulationanditscompatibilitywithothercropprotectionpracticesinsmallholderbeanfarmingsystems
AT woolleyvictoriac naturalpestregulationanditscompatibilitywithothercropprotectionpracticesinsmallholderbeanfarmingsystems