Cargando…

The clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate perforators: Is it worse than distal M1 occlusion? Retrospective observational study

Although the success rate of recanalization in acute intracranial artery occlusion is high, there is a poor rate of improvement in functional clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ko, Hak Cheol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027036
_version_ 1783742962259197952
author Ko, Hak Cheol
author_facet Ko, Hak Cheol
author_sort Ko, Hak Cheol
collection PubMed
description Although the success rate of recanalization in acute intracranial artery occlusion is high, there is a poor rate of improvement in functional clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate arteries (LSAs) compared with distal M1 occlusion-sparing the LSAs. A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions who had a successful recanalization subsequent to mechanical thrombectomy. The recanalization results were estimated using the thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade assessed by digital subtraction angiography. To confirm the ischemic change resulting from the lenticulostriate artery occlusion, we reviewed the neuroimaging findings from magnetic resonance imaging 1 day after mechanical thrombectomy. The functional outcomes were then evaluated using the modified Rankin scale at 90 days. In total, 28 patients with MCA M1 occlusion had successful recanalization outcomes with thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grades IIa, IIb, and III. Among the 28 patients, 17 had proximal M1 occlusions and 11 had distal M1 occlusions. Demographic factors, including initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, time from symptom to recanalization, and recanalization rate did not differ considerably between patients with proximal and distal M1 occlusions. Regarding infarctions in the basal ganglia, internal capsule, and corona radiata, there were statistically significant differences between the proximal and distal M1 occlusions. However, there were no significant differences in good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤2) observed between the groups at 90 days after mechanical thrombectomy. Although proximal M1 occlusion had more frequent infarctions associated with the LSA territories, these were not related to poor functional outcomes. Both proximal and distal M1 occlusion demonstrated comparably good outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8389878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83898782021-09-02 The clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate perforators: Is it worse than distal M1 occlusion? Retrospective observational study Ko, Hak Cheol Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 Although the success rate of recanalization in acute intracranial artery occlusion is high, there is a poor rate of improvement in functional clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate arteries (LSAs) compared with distal M1 occlusion-sparing the LSAs. A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions who had a successful recanalization subsequent to mechanical thrombectomy. The recanalization results were estimated using the thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade assessed by digital subtraction angiography. To confirm the ischemic change resulting from the lenticulostriate artery occlusion, we reviewed the neuroimaging findings from magnetic resonance imaging 1 day after mechanical thrombectomy. The functional outcomes were then evaluated using the modified Rankin scale at 90 days. In total, 28 patients with MCA M1 occlusion had successful recanalization outcomes with thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grades IIa, IIb, and III. Among the 28 patients, 17 had proximal M1 occlusions and 11 had distal M1 occlusions. Demographic factors, including initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, time from symptom to recanalization, and recanalization rate did not differ considerably between patients with proximal and distal M1 occlusions. Regarding infarctions in the basal ganglia, internal capsule, and corona radiata, there were statistically significant differences between the proximal and distal M1 occlusions. However, there were no significant differences in good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤2) observed between the groups at 90 days after mechanical thrombectomy. Although proximal M1 occlusion had more frequent infarctions associated with the LSA territories, these were not related to poor functional outcomes. Both proximal and distal M1 occlusion demonstrated comparably good outcomes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8389878/ /pubmed/34449484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027036 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 5300
Ko, Hak Cheol
The clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate perforators: Is it worse than distal M1 occlusion? Retrospective observational study
title The clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate perforators: Is it worse than distal M1 occlusion? Retrospective observational study
title_full The clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate perforators: Is it worse than distal M1 occlusion? Retrospective observational study
title_fullStr The clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate perforators: Is it worse than distal M1 occlusion? Retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed The clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate perforators: Is it worse than distal M1 occlusion? Retrospective observational study
title_short The clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal M1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate perforators: Is it worse than distal M1 occlusion? Retrospective observational study
title_sort clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for proximal m1 occlusion involving lenticulostriate perforators: is it worse than distal m1 occlusion? retrospective observational study
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027036
work_keys_str_mv AT kohakcheol theclinicaloutcomesofmechanicalthrombectomyforproximalm1occlusioninvolvinglenticulostriateperforatorsisitworsethandistalm1occlusionretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kohakcheol clinicaloutcomesofmechanicalthrombectomyforproximalm1occlusioninvolvinglenticulostriateperforatorsisitworsethandistalm1occlusionretrospectiveobservationalstudy