Cargando…

Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery: A prospective randomized double-blinded study

BACKGROUND: Laryngeal microsurgery (LMS) causes hemodynamic instability and postoperative agitation, cough, pain, nausea, and vomiting. Moreover, because of a short operation time, it is associated with challenging anesthetic management. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of continu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Young Sung, Chang, Hae Wone, Kim, Heezoo, Park, Jong Sun, Won, Young Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027045
_version_ 1783742985683337216
author Kim, Young Sung
Chang, Hae Wone
Kim, Heezoo
Park, Jong Sun
Won, Young Ju
author_facet Kim, Young Sung
Chang, Hae Wone
Kim, Heezoo
Park, Jong Sun
Won, Young Ju
author_sort Kim, Young Sung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laryngeal microsurgery (LMS) causes hemodynamic instability and postoperative agitation, cough, pain, nausea, and vomiting. Moreover, because of a short operation time, it is associated with challenging anesthetic management. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of continuous administration of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in inducing general anesthesia in patients undergoing LMS. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized control design. Continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (group D) or remifentanil (group R) was administered from 10 minutes before the induction of anesthesia to the end of surgery. In both groups, 1.5 mg/kg propofol and 0.5 mg/kg rocuronium were administered for the induction of anesthesia, and desflurane were titrated during the measurement of the bispectral index. We recorded hemodynamic data, recovery time, grade of cough, pain score, and analgesic requirements during the perioperative period. RESULTS: 61 patients were finally analyzed (30 for group D, 31 for group R). The incidence of moderate to severe postoperative sore throat was higher in group R than in group D (42% vs 10%, P = .008), and the quantity of rescue fentanyl used in post-anesthesia care unit was significantly higher in group R than in group D (23.2 ± 24.7 mg vs 3.3 ± 8.6 mg; P < .001); however, the time required for eye opening was significantly longer in group D than in group R (599.4 ± 177.9 seconds vs 493.5 ± 103.6 seconds; P = .006). The proportion of patients with no cough or single cough during extubation was comparable between the 2 groups (group D vs group R: 73% vs 70%) as was the incidence of hemodynamic instability. CONCLUSION: Although there was a transient delay in emergence time, dexmedetomidine reduced postoperative opioid use and the incidence of sore throat. Dexmedetomidine may be used as an alternative agent to opioids in patients undergoing LMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8389956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83899562021-09-02 Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery: A prospective randomized double-blinded study Kim, Young Sung Chang, Hae Wone Kim, Heezoo Park, Jong Sun Won, Young Ju Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Laryngeal microsurgery (LMS) causes hemodynamic instability and postoperative agitation, cough, pain, nausea, and vomiting. Moreover, because of a short operation time, it is associated with challenging anesthetic management. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of continuous administration of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in inducing general anesthesia in patients undergoing LMS. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized control design. Continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (group D) or remifentanil (group R) was administered from 10 minutes before the induction of anesthesia to the end of surgery. In both groups, 1.5 mg/kg propofol and 0.5 mg/kg rocuronium were administered for the induction of anesthesia, and desflurane were titrated during the measurement of the bispectral index. We recorded hemodynamic data, recovery time, grade of cough, pain score, and analgesic requirements during the perioperative period. RESULTS: 61 patients were finally analyzed (30 for group D, 31 for group R). The incidence of moderate to severe postoperative sore throat was higher in group R than in group D (42% vs 10%, P = .008), and the quantity of rescue fentanyl used in post-anesthesia care unit was significantly higher in group R than in group D (23.2 ± 24.7 mg vs 3.3 ± 8.6 mg; P < .001); however, the time required for eye opening was significantly longer in group D than in group R (599.4 ± 177.9 seconds vs 493.5 ± 103.6 seconds; P = .006). The proportion of patients with no cough or single cough during extubation was comparable between the 2 groups (group D vs group R: 73% vs 70%) as was the incidence of hemodynamic instability. CONCLUSION: Although there was a transient delay in emergence time, dexmedetomidine reduced postoperative opioid use and the incidence of sore throat. Dexmedetomidine may be used as an alternative agent to opioids in patients undergoing LMS. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8389956/ /pubmed/34449490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027045 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 3300
Kim, Young Sung
Chang, Hae Wone
Kim, Heezoo
Park, Jong Sun
Won, Young Ju
Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery: A prospective randomized double-blinded study
title Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery: A prospective randomized double-blinded study
title_full Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery: A prospective randomized double-blinded study
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery: A prospective randomized double-blinded study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery: A prospective randomized double-blinded study
title_short Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery: A prospective randomized double-blinded study
title_sort comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery: a prospective randomized double-blinded study
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8389956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027045
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoungsung comparisonoftheeffectsofdexmedetomidineandremifentanilonperioperativehemodynamicsandrecoveryprofileofpatientsundergoinglaryngealmicrosurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedstudy
AT changhaewone comparisonoftheeffectsofdexmedetomidineandremifentanilonperioperativehemodynamicsandrecoveryprofileofpatientsundergoinglaryngealmicrosurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedstudy
AT kimheezoo comparisonoftheeffectsofdexmedetomidineandremifentanilonperioperativehemodynamicsandrecoveryprofileofpatientsundergoinglaryngealmicrosurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedstudy
AT parkjongsun comparisonoftheeffectsofdexmedetomidineandremifentanilonperioperativehemodynamicsandrecoveryprofileofpatientsundergoinglaryngealmicrosurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedstudy
AT wonyoungju comparisonoftheeffectsofdexmedetomidineandremifentanilonperioperativehemodynamicsandrecoveryprofileofpatientsundergoinglaryngealmicrosurgeryaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedstudy