Cargando…

Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens

BACKGROUND: The ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels detect multiple respiratory pathogens, mainly viruses but also Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis. The assays have been marketed for use in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. For diagnosing bacterial p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Asten, Suzanne A. V., Boers, Stefan A., de Groot, Jolanda D. F., Schuurman, R., Claas, Eric C. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02289-w
_version_ 1783743025073094656
author van Asten, Suzanne A. V.
Boers, Stefan A.
de Groot, Jolanda D. F.
Schuurman, R.
Claas, Eric C. J.
author_facet van Asten, Suzanne A. V.
Boers, Stefan A.
de Groot, Jolanda D. F.
Schuurman, R.
Claas, Eric C. J.
author_sort van Asten, Suzanne A. V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels detect multiple respiratory pathogens, mainly viruses but also Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis. The assays have been marketed for use in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. For diagnosing bacterial pneumonia, lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens are indicated. Aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these syndromic panels for these three bacterial targets in samples from the LRT. Fifty-six specimens were collected from our repositories, five negative samples and fifty-one samples which had been previously tested positive with the routine diagnostic real-time PCR assays for Legionella spp. (N = 20), Bordetella spp. (N = 16) or M. pneumoniae (N = 15). RESULTS: The QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel V2 (RP) assay detected all of the L. pneumophila and B. pertussis positive samples but only 11/15 (73.3 %) of the M. pneumoniae targets. The ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel (RPP) assay detected 10/14 (71.4 %) of the L. pneumophila targets, 8/12 (66.7 %) of the B. pertussis positive samples and 13/15 (86.7 %) of the M. pneumoniae targets. CONCLUSIONS: No false-positive results were reported for all three bacterial pathogens by both assays. The clinical performance of both assays depended highly on the bacterial load in the sample and the type of specimen under investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8390116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83901162021-08-27 Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens van Asten, Suzanne A. V. Boers, Stefan A. de Groot, Jolanda D. F. Schuurman, R. Claas, Eric C. J. BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels detect multiple respiratory pathogens, mainly viruses but also Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis. The assays have been marketed for use in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. For diagnosing bacterial pneumonia, lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens are indicated. Aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these syndromic panels for these three bacterial targets in samples from the LRT. Fifty-six specimens were collected from our repositories, five negative samples and fifty-one samples which had been previously tested positive with the routine diagnostic real-time PCR assays for Legionella spp. (N = 20), Bordetella spp. (N = 16) or M. pneumoniae (N = 15). RESULTS: The QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel V2 (RP) assay detected all of the L. pneumophila and B. pertussis positive samples but only 11/15 (73.3 %) of the M. pneumoniae targets. The ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel (RPP) assay detected 10/14 (71.4 %) of the L. pneumophila targets, 8/12 (66.7 %) of the B. pertussis positive samples and 13/15 (86.7 %) of the M. pneumoniae targets. CONCLUSIONS: No false-positive results were reported for all three bacterial pathogens by both assays. The clinical performance of both assays depended highly on the bacterial load in the sample and the type of specimen under investigation. BioMed Central 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8390116/ /pubmed/34445973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02289-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Asten, Suzanne A. V.
Boers, Stefan A.
de Groot, Jolanda D. F.
Schuurman, R.
Claas, Eric C. J.
Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
title Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
title_full Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
title_short Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
title_sort evaluation of the genmark eplex® and qiastat-dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02289-w
work_keys_str_mv AT vanastensuzanneav evaluationofthegenmarkeplexandqiastatdxrespiratorypathogenpanelsindetectingbacterialtargetsinlowerrespiratorytractspecimens
AT boersstefana evaluationofthegenmarkeplexandqiastatdxrespiratorypathogenpanelsindetectingbacterialtargetsinlowerrespiratorytractspecimens
AT degrootjolandadf evaluationofthegenmarkeplexandqiastatdxrespiratorypathogenpanelsindetectingbacterialtargetsinlowerrespiratorytractspecimens
AT schuurmanr evaluationofthegenmarkeplexandqiastatdxrespiratorypathogenpanelsindetectingbacterialtargetsinlowerrespiratorytractspecimens
AT claasericcj evaluationofthegenmarkeplexandqiastatdxrespiratorypathogenpanelsindetectingbacterialtargetsinlowerrespiratorytractspecimens