Cargando…
Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Static or motion manual palpation of the low back is commonly used to assess pain location and reproduction in low back pain (LBP) patients. The purpose of this study is to review the reliability and validity of manual palpation used for the assessment of LBP in adults. METHOD:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3 |
_version_ | 1783743054100824064 |
---|---|
author | Nolet, Paul S. Yu, Hainan Côté, Pierre Meyer, Anne-Laure Kristman, Vicki L. Sutton, Deborah Murnaghan, Kent Lemeunier, Nadège |
author_facet | Nolet, Paul S. Yu, Hainan Côté, Pierre Meyer, Anne-Laure Kristman, Vicki L. Sutton, Deborah Murnaghan, Kent Lemeunier, Nadège |
author_sort | Nolet, Paul S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Static or motion manual palpation of the low back is commonly used to assess pain location and reproduction in low back pain (LBP) patients. The purpose of this study is to review the reliability and validity of manual palpation used for the assessment of LBP in adults. METHOD: We systematically searched five databases from 2000 to 2019. We critically appraised internal validity of studies using QAREL and QUADAS-2 instruments. We stratified results using best-evidence synthesis. Validity studies were classified according to Sackett and Haynes. RESULTS: We identified 2023 eligible articles, of which 14 were low risk of bias. Evidence suggests that reliability of soft tissue structures palpation is inconsistent, and reliability of bony structures and joint mobility palpation is poor. We found preliminary evidence that gluteal muscle palpation for tenderness may be valid in differentiating LBP patients with and without radiculopathy. CONCLUSION: Reliability of manual palpation tests in the assessment of LBP patients varies greatly. This is problematic because these tests are commonly used by manual therapists and clinicians. Little is known about the validity of these tests; therefore, their clinical utility is uncertain. High quality validity studies are needed to inform the clinical use of manual palpation tests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8390263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83902632021-08-27 Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review Nolet, Paul S. Yu, Hainan Côté, Pierre Meyer, Anne-Laure Kristman, Vicki L. Sutton, Deborah Murnaghan, Kent Lemeunier, Nadège Chiropr Man Therap Systematic Review ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Static or motion manual palpation of the low back is commonly used to assess pain location and reproduction in low back pain (LBP) patients. The purpose of this study is to review the reliability and validity of manual palpation used for the assessment of LBP in adults. METHOD: We systematically searched five databases from 2000 to 2019. We critically appraised internal validity of studies using QAREL and QUADAS-2 instruments. We stratified results using best-evidence synthesis. Validity studies were classified according to Sackett and Haynes. RESULTS: We identified 2023 eligible articles, of which 14 were low risk of bias. Evidence suggests that reliability of soft tissue structures palpation is inconsistent, and reliability of bony structures and joint mobility palpation is poor. We found preliminary evidence that gluteal muscle palpation for tenderness may be valid in differentiating LBP patients with and without radiculopathy. CONCLUSION: Reliability of manual palpation tests in the assessment of LBP patients varies greatly. This is problematic because these tests are commonly used by manual therapists and clinicians. Little is known about the validity of these tests; therefore, their clinical utility is uncertain. High quality validity studies are needed to inform the clinical use of manual palpation tests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3. BioMed Central 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8390263/ /pubmed/34446040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Nolet, Paul S. Yu, Hainan Côté, Pierre Meyer, Anne-Laure Kristman, Vicki L. Sutton, Deborah Murnaghan, Kent Lemeunier, Nadège Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review |
title | Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review |
title_full | Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review |
title_short | Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review |
title_sort | reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noletpauls reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview AT yuhainan reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview AT cotepierre reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview AT meyerannelaure reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview AT kristmanvickil reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview AT suttondeborah reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview AT murnaghankent reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview AT lemeuniernadege reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview |