Cargando…

Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Static or motion manual palpation of the low back is commonly used to assess pain location and reproduction in low back pain (LBP) patients. The purpose of this study is to review the reliability and validity of manual palpation used for the assessment of LBP in adults. METHOD:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nolet, Paul S., Yu, Hainan, Côté, Pierre, Meyer, Anne-Laure, Kristman, Vicki L., Sutton, Deborah, Murnaghan, Kent, Lemeunier, Nadège
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3
_version_ 1783743054100824064
author Nolet, Paul S.
Yu, Hainan
Côté, Pierre
Meyer, Anne-Laure
Kristman, Vicki L.
Sutton, Deborah
Murnaghan, Kent
Lemeunier, Nadège
author_facet Nolet, Paul S.
Yu, Hainan
Côté, Pierre
Meyer, Anne-Laure
Kristman, Vicki L.
Sutton, Deborah
Murnaghan, Kent
Lemeunier, Nadège
author_sort Nolet, Paul S.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Static or motion manual palpation of the low back is commonly used to assess pain location and reproduction in low back pain (LBP) patients. The purpose of this study is to review the reliability and validity of manual palpation used for the assessment of LBP in adults. METHOD: We systematically searched five databases from 2000 to 2019. We critically appraised internal validity of studies using QAREL and QUADAS-2 instruments. We stratified results using best-evidence synthesis. Validity studies were classified according to Sackett and Haynes. RESULTS: We identified 2023 eligible articles, of which 14 were low risk of bias. Evidence suggests that reliability of soft tissue structures palpation is inconsistent, and reliability of bony structures and joint mobility palpation is poor. We found preliminary evidence that gluteal muscle palpation for tenderness may be valid in differentiating LBP patients with and without radiculopathy. CONCLUSION: Reliability of manual palpation tests in the assessment of LBP patients varies greatly. This is problematic because these tests are commonly used by manual therapists and clinicians. Little is known about the validity of these tests; therefore, their clinical utility is uncertain. High quality validity studies are needed to inform the clinical use of manual palpation tests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8390263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83902632021-08-27 Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review Nolet, Paul S. Yu, Hainan Côté, Pierre Meyer, Anne-Laure Kristman, Vicki L. Sutton, Deborah Murnaghan, Kent Lemeunier, Nadège Chiropr Man Therap Systematic Review ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Static or motion manual palpation of the low back is commonly used to assess pain location and reproduction in low back pain (LBP) patients. The purpose of this study is to review the reliability and validity of manual palpation used for the assessment of LBP in adults. METHOD: We systematically searched five databases from 2000 to 2019. We critically appraised internal validity of studies using QAREL and QUADAS-2 instruments. We stratified results using best-evidence synthesis. Validity studies were classified according to Sackett and Haynes. RESULTS: We identified 2023 eligible articles, of which 14 were low risk of bias. Evidence suggests that reliability of soft tissue structures palpation is inconsistent, and reliability of bony structures and joint mobility palpation is poor. We found preliminary evidence that gluteal muscle palpation for tenderness may be valid in differentiating LBP patients with and without radiculopathy. CONCLUSION: Reliability of manual palpation tests in the assessment of LBP patients varies greatly. This is problematic because these tests are commonly used by manual therapists and clinicians. Little is known about the validity of these tests; therefore, their clinical utility is uncertain. High quality validity studies are needed to inform the clinical use of manual palpation tests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3. BioMed Central 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8390263/ /pubmed/34446040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Nolet, Paul S.
Yu, Hainan
Côté, Pierre
Meyer, Anne-Laure
Kristman, Vicki L.
Sutton, Deborah
Murnaghan, Kent
Lemeunier, Nadège
Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
title Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
title_full Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
title_short Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
title_sort reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3
work_keys_str_mv AT noletpauls reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview
AT yuhainan reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview
AT cotepierre reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview
AT meyerannelaure reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview
AT kristmanvickil reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview
AT suttondeborah reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview
AT murnaghankent reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview
AT lemeuniernadege reliabilityandvalidityofmanualpalpationfortheassessmentofpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicandcriticalreview