Cargando…
Mucosal Integrity Testing Can Detect Differences in the Rectums of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Compared to Controls: A Pilot Study
BACKGROUND: While the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is incompletely understood, disruption of epithelial integrity is suspected to play a prominent role in disease initiation and progression. Currently, there is no convenient way to measure this in vivo. AIMS: Our aim is to determ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33638748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06888-5 |
_version_ | 1783743114390798336 |
---|---|
author | Basil, Miles Schwartz, David Dalal, Robin Horst, Sara Scoville, Elizabeth Adams, Dawn Beaulieu, Dawn Slaughter, James C. Higginbotham, Tina Vaezi, Michael Choksi, Yash |
author_facet | Basil, Miles Schwartz, David Dalal, Robin Horst, Sara Scoville, Elizabeth Adams, Dawn Beaulieu, Dawn Slaughter, James C. Higginbotham, Tina Vaezi, Michael Choksi, Yash |
author_sort | Basil, Miles |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is incompletely understood, disruption of epithelial integrity is suspected to play a prominent role in disease initiation and progression. Currently, there is no convenient way to measure this in vivo. AIMS: Our aim is to determine whether a mucosal integrity (MI) testing device that has been used to measure MI in the esophagus can also be used to measure barrier function in the colon during colonoscopy. METHODS: Mucosal integrity testing was measured in patients with IBD (n = 17) and controls (n = 7) during colonoscopy. During the procedure, an MI catheter was passed down the working channel of the colonoscope and placed along the mucosal wall to measure MI in the rectum, left, transverse, and right colon. In patients with IBD, MI measurements and biopsies were taken in areas which appeared inflamed when present. We then determined if there was a significant difference in MI between patients with IBD and controls. RESULTS: MI was significantly higher in the rectum of patients with IBD (CD and UC combined) versus control colons [767 (618–991) vs. 531 (418–604) ohms, P < 0.01]. There were no significant differences in MI among patients with IBD versus controls in the right, transverse, or left colon. Within the IBD group, there were no significant differences in MI between inflamed versus non-inflamed rectums. There was no correlation between quality of life scores or endoscopic severity with MI, though this study was likely underpowered to detect these differences. CONCLUSION: Rectal MI is significantly higher in patients with IBD versus controls. Future studies are needed to determine how this information can be used clinically. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10620-021-06888-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8390582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83905822022-03-01 Mucosal Integrity Testing Can Detect Differences in the Rectums of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Compared to Controls: A Pilot Study Basil, Miles Schwartz, David Dalal, Robin Horst, Sara Scoville, Elizabeth Adams, Dawn Beaulieu, Dawn Slaughter, James C. Higginbotham, Tina Vaezi, Michael Choksi, Yash Dig Dis Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: While the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is incompletely understood, disruption of epithelial integrity is suspected to play a prominent role in disease initiation and progression. Currently, there is no convenient way to measure this in vivo. AIMS: Our aim is to determine whether a mucosal integrity (MI) testing device that has been used to measure MI in the esophagus can also be used to measure barrier function in the colon during colonoscopy. METHODS: Mucosal integrity testing was measured in patients with IBD (n = 17) and controls (n = 7) during colonoscopy. During the procedure, an MI catheter was passed down the working channel of the colonoscope and placed along the mucosal wall to measure MI in the rectum, left, transverse, and right colon. In patients with IBD, MI measurements and biopsies were taken in areas which appeared inflamed when present. We then determined if there was a significant difference in MI between patients with IBD and controls. RESULTS: MI was significantly higher in the rectum of patients with IBD (CD and UC combined) versus control colons [767 (618–991) vs. 531 (418–604) ohms, P < 0.01]. There were no significant differences in MI among patients with IBD versus controls in the right, transverse, or left colon. Within the IBD group, there were no significant differences in MI between inflamed versus non-inflamed rectums. There was no correlation between quality of life scores or endoscopic severity with MI, though this study was likely underpowered to detect these differences. CONCLUSION: Rectal MI is significantly higher in patients with IBD versus controls. Future studies are needed to determine how this information can be used clinically. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10620-021-06888-5. Springer US 2021-02-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8390582/ /pubmed/33638748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06888-5 Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Basil, Miles Schwartz, David Dalal, Robin Horst, Sara Scoville, Elizabeth Adams, Dawn Beaulieu, Dawn Slaughter, James C. Higginbotham, Tina Vaezi, Michael Choksi, Yash Mucosal Integrity Testing Can Detect Differences in the Rectums of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Compared to Controls: A Pilot Study |
title | Mucosal Integrity Testing Can Detect Differences in the Rectums of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Compared to Controls: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Mucosal Integrity Testing Can Detect Differences in the Rectums of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Compared to Controls: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Mucosal Integrity Testing Can Detect Differences in the Rectums of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Compared to Controls: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Mucosal Integrity Testing Can Detect Differences in the Rectums of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Compared to Controls: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Mucosal Integrity Testing Can Detect Differences in the Rectums of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Compared to Controls: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | mucosal integrity testing can detect differences in the rectums of patients with inflammatory bowel disease compared to controls: a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33638748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06888-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT basilmiles mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT schwartzdavid mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT dalalrobin mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT horstsara mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT scovilleelizabeth mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT adamsdawn mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT beaulieudawn mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT slaughterjamesc mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT higginbothamtina mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT vaezimichael mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy AT choksiyash mucosalintegritytestingcandetectdifferencesintherectumsofpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasecomparedtocontrolsapilotstudy |