Cargando…

Phytochemistry reflects different evolutionary history in traditional classes versus specialized structural motifs

Foundational hypotheses addressing plant–insect codiversification and plant defense theory typically assume a macroevolutionary pattern whereby closely related plants have similar chemical profiles. However, numerous studies have documented variation in the degree of phytochemical trait lability, ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uckele, Kathryn A., Jahner, Joshua P., Tepe, Eric J., Richards, Lora A., Dyer, Lee A., Ochsenrider, Kaitlin M., Philbin, Casey S., Kato, Massuo J., Yamaguchi, Lydia F., Forister, Matthew L., Smilanich, Angela M., Dodson, Craig D., Jeffrey, Christopher S., Parchman, Thomas L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96431-3
_version_ 1783743124407844864
author Uckele, Kathryn A.
Jahner, Joshua P.
Tepe, Eric J.
Richards, Lora A.
Dyer, Lee A.
Ochsenrider, Kaitlin M.
Philbin, Casey S.
Kato, Massuo J.
Yamaguchi, Lydia F.
Forister, Matthew L.
Smilanich, Angela M.
Dodson, Craig D.
Jeffrey, Christopher S.
Parchman, Thomas L.
author_facet Uckele, Kathryn A.
Jahner, Joshua P.
Tepe, Eric J.
Richards, Lora A.
Dyer, Lee A.
Ochsenrider, Kaitlin M.
Philbin, Casey S.
Kato, Massuo J.
Yamaguchi, Lydia F.
Forister, Matthew L.
Smilanich, Angela M.
Dodson, Craig D.
Jeffrey, Christopher S.
Parchman, Thomas L.
author_sort Uckele, Kathryn A.
collection PubMed
description Foundational hypotheses addressing plant–insect codiversification and plant defense theory typically assume a macroevolutionary pattern whereby closely related plants have similar chemical profiles. However, numerous studies have documented variation in the degree of phytochemical trait lability, raising the possibility that phytochemical evolution is more nuanced than initially assumed. We utilize proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) data, chemical classification, and double digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) to resolve evolutionary relationships and characterize the evolution of secondary chemistry in the Neotropical plant clade Radula (Piper; Piperaceae). Sequencing data substantially improved phylogenetic resolution relative to past studies, and spectroscopic characterization revealed the presence of 35 metabolite classes. Metabolite classes displayed phylogenetic signal, whereas the crude (1)H NMR spectra featured little evidence of phylogenetic signal in multivariate tests of chemical resonances. Evolutionary correlations were detected in two pairs of compound classes (flavonoids with chalcones; p-alkenyl phenols with kavalactones), where the gain or loss of a class was dependent on the other’s state. Overall, the evolution of secondary chemistry in Radula is characterized by strong phylogenetic signal of traditional compound classes and weak phylogenetic signal of specialized chemical motifs, consistent with both classic evolutionary hypotheses and recent examinations of phytochemical evolution in young lineages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8390663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83906632021-09-01 Phytochemistry reflects different evolutionary history in traditional classes versus specialized structural motifs Uckele, Kathryn A. Jahner, Joshua P. Tepe, Eric J. Richards, Lora A. Dyer, Lee A. Ochsenrider, Kaitlin M. Philbin, Casey S. Kato, Massuo J. Yamaguchi, Lydia F. Forister, Matthew L. Smilanich, Angela M. Dodson, Craig D. Jeffrey, Christopher S. Parchman, Thomas L. Sci Rep Article Foundational hypotheses addressing plant–insect codiversification and plant defense theory typically assume a macroevolutionary pattern whereby closely related plants have similar chemical profiles. However, numerous studies have documented variation in the degree of phytochemical trait lability, raising the possibility that phytochemical evolution is more nuanced than initially assumed. We utilize proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) data, chemical classification, and double digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) to resolve evolutionary relationships and characterize the evolution of secondary chemistry in the Neotropical plant clade Radula (Piper; Piperaceae). Sequencing data substantially improved phylogenetic resolution relative to past studies, and spectroscopic characterization revealed the presence of 35 metabolite classes. Metabolite classes displayed phylogenetic signal, whereas the crude (1)H NMR spectra featured little evidence of phylogenetic signal in multivariate tests of chemical resonances. Evolutionary correlations were detected in two pairs of compound classes (flavonoids with chalcones; p-alkenyl phenols with kavalactones), where the gain or loss of a class was dependent on the other’s state. Overall, the evolution of secondary chemistry in Radula is characterized by strong phylogenetic signal of traditional compound classes and weak phylogenetic signal of specialized chemical motifs, consistent with both classic evolutionary hypotheses and recent examinations of phytochemical evolution in young lineages. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8390663/ /pubmed/34446754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96431-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Uckele, Kathryn A.
Jahner, Joshua P.
Tepe, Eric J.
Richards, Lora A.
Dyer, Lee A.
Ochsenrider, Kaitlin M.
Philbin, Casey S.
Kato, Massuo J.
Yamaguchi, Lydia F.
Forister, Matthew L.
Smilanich, Angela M.
Dodson, Craig D.
Jeffrey, Christopher S.
Parchman, Thomas L.
Phytochemistry reflects different evolutionary history in traditional classes versus specialized structural motifs
title Phytochemistry reflects different evolutionary history in traditional classes versus specialized structural motifs
title_full Phytochemistry reflects different evolutionary history in traditional classes versus specialized structural motifs
title_fullStr Phytochemistry reflects different evolutionary history in traditional classes versus specialized structural motifs
title_full_unstemmed Phytochemistry reflects different evolutionary history in traditional classes versus specialized structural motifs
title_short Phytochemistry reflects different evolutionary history in traditional classes versus specialized structural motifs
title_sort phytochemistry reflects different evolutionary history in traditional classes versus specialized structural motifs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96431-3
work_keys_str_mv AT uckelekathryna phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT jahnerjoshuap phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT tepeericj phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT richardsloraa phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT dyerleea phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT ochsenriderkaitlinm phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT philbincaseys phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT katomassuoj phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT yamaguchilydiaf phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT foristermatthewl phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT smilanichangelam phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT dodsoncraigd phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT jeffreychristophers phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs
AT parchmanthomasl phytochemistryreflectsdifferentevolutionaryhistoryintraditionalclassesversusspecializedstructuralmotifs