Cargando…

Simple model for estimation of absorbed dose by organs and tumors after PRRT from a single SPECT/CT study

BACKGROUND: Following each cycle of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), absorbed doses by tumors and normal organs are typically calculated from three quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) studies acquired at t(1) = 24 h, t(2) = 96 h, t(3)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chicheportiche, Alexandre, Sason, Moshe, Godefroy, Jeremy, Krausz, Yodphat, Zidan, Mahmoud, Oleinikov, Kira, Meirovitz, Amichay, Gross, David J., Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona, Ben-Haim, Simona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34436698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00409-z
_version_ 1783743135492341760
author Chicheportiche, Alexandre
Sason, Moshe
Godefroy, Jeremy
Krausz, Yodphat
Zidan, Mahmoud
Oleinikov, Kira
Meirovitz, Amichay
Gross, David J.
Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona
Ben-Haim, Simona
author_facet Chicheportiche, Alexandre
Sason, Moshe
Godefroy, Jeremy
Krausz, Yodphat
Zidan, Mahmoud
Oleinikov, Kira
Meirovitz, Amichay
Gross, David J.
Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona
Ben-Haim, Simona
author_sort Chicheportiche, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Following each cycle of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), absorbed doses by tumors and normal organs are typically calculated from three quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) studies acquired at t(1) = 24 h, t(2) = 96 h, t(3) = 168 h after the first cycle of treatment and from a single study at t(1) after the subsequent cycles. In the present study, we have assessed the feasibility of a single SPECT/CT study after each PRRT cycle using a trained multiple linear regression (MLR) model for absorbed dose calculation and have evaluated its impact on patient management. Quantitative [(177)Lu]-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT data after PRRT of seventy-two consecutive metastatic neuroendocrine tumors patients were retrospectively evaluated. A set of 40 consecutive studies was used to train the MLR model. The two independent variables of the model included the time of imaging after administration of the treatment and the radiopharmaceutical activity concentration in a given  organ/tumor. The dependent variable was the dose absorbed by the organ/tumor obtained with the standard protocol. For bone marrow dosimetry, the independent variables included the time of imaging, and the blood and remainder of the body activity concentration. The model was evaluated in 32 consecutive patients. Absorbed doses were assessed for kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen and tumor sites. RESULTS: There was no difference in management decisions, whether PRRT can be safely continued or not because unsafe absorbed dose to risk organs between the standard and the MLR model-based protocol using a single SPECT/CT study performed at t(3) = 168 h after the first cycle and at t(1) = 24 h after the subsequent cycles. Cumulative absorbed doses were obtained with mean relative differences of − 0.5% ± 5.4%, 1.6% ± 15.1%, − 6.2% ± 7.3%, − 5.5% ± 5.8% and 2.9% ± 12.7% for kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen and tumors, respectively (Pearson’s r correlation coefficient 0.99, 0.91, 0.99, 0.99 and 0.97, respectively). CONCLUSION: Dosimetry calculations using a MLR model with a single SPECT/CT study are in good agreement with the standard protocol, while avoiding the use of dosimetry software and enabling improved patient comfort and reduced scanner and staff time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-021-00409-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8390741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83907412021-09-14 Simple model for estimation of absorbed dose by organs and tumors after PRRT from a single SPECT/CT study Chicheportiche, Alexandre Sason, Moshe Godefroy, Jeremy Krausz, Yodphat Zidan, Mahmoud Oleinikov, Kira Meirovitz, Amichay Gross, David J. Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona Ben-Haim, Simona EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Following each cycle of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), absorbed doses by tumors and normal organs are typically calculated from three quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) studies acquired at t(1) = 24 h, t(2) = 96 h, t(3) = 168 h after the first cycle of treatment and from a single study at t(1) after the subsequent cycles. In the present study, we have assessed the feasibility of a single SPECT/CT study after each PRRT cycle using a trained multiple linear regression (MLR) model for absorbed dose calculation and have evaluated its impact on patient management. Quantitative [(177)Lu]-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT data after PRRT of seventy-two consecutive metastatic neuroendocrine tumors patients were retrospectively evaluated. A set of 40 consecutive studies was used to train the MLR model. The two independent variables of the model included the time of imaging after administration of the treatment and the radiopharmaceutical activity concentration in a given  organ/tumor. The dependent variable was the dose absorbed by the organ/tumor obtained with the standard protocol. For bone marrow dosimetry, the independent variables included the time of imaging, and the blood and remainder of the body activity concentration. The model was evaluated in 32 consecutive patients. Absorbed doses were assessed for kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen and tumor sites. RESULTS: There was no difference in management decisions, whether PRRT can be safely continued or not because unsafe absorbed dose to risk organs between the standard and the MLR model-based protocol using a single SPECT/CT study performed at t(3) = 168 h after the first cycle and at t(1) = 24 h after the subsequent cycles. Cumulative absorbed doses were obtained with mean relative differences of − 0.5% ± 5.4%, 1.6% ± 15.1%, − 6.2% ± 7.3%, − 5.5% ± 5.8% and 2.9% ± 12.7% for kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen and tumors, respectively (Pearson’s r correlation coefficient 0.99, 0.91, 0.99, 0.99 and 0.97, respectively). CONCLUSION: Dosimetry calculations using a MLR model with a single SPECT/CT study are in good agreement with the standard protocol, while avoiding the use of dosimetry software and enabling improved patient comfort and reduced scanner and staff time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-021-00409-z. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8390741/ /pubmed/34436698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00409-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Chicheportiche, Alexandre
Sason, Moshe
Godefroy, Jeremy
Krausz, Yodphat
Zidan, Mahmoud
Oleinikov, Kira
Meirovitz, Amichay
Gross, David J.
Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona
Ben-Haim, Simona
Simple model for estimation of absorbed dose by organs and tumors after PRRT from a single SPECT/CT study
title Simple model for estimation of absorbed dose by organs and tumors after PRRT from a single SPECT/CT study
title_full Simple model for estimation of absorbed dose by organs and tumors after PRRT from a single SPECT/CT study
title_fullStr Simple model for estimation of absorbed dose by organs and tumors after PRRT from a single SPECT/CT study
title_full_unstemmed Simple model for estimation of absorbed dose by organs and tumors after PRRT from a single SPECT/CT study
title_short Simple model for estimation of absorbed dose by organs and tumors after PRRT from a single SPECT/CT study
title_sort simple model for estimation of absorbed dose by organs and tumors after prrt from a single spect/ct study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34436698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00409-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chicheportichealexandre simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy
AT sasonmoshe simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy
AT godefroyjeremy simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy
AT krauszyodphat simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy
AT zidanmahmoud simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy
AT oleinikovkira simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy
AT meirovitzamichay simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy
AT grossdavidj simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy
AT grozinskyglasbergsimona simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy
AT benhaimsimona simplemodelforestimationofabsorbeddosebyorgansandtumorsafterprrtfromasinglespectctstudy