Cargando…

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Preferences and Decision Making for Symptomatic Urolithiasis

Background: Pandemic restrictions have changed how patients approach symptomatic kidney stones. We used a mixed-methods digital ethnographic approach to evaluate social media discussions about patient concerns and preferences for urolithiasis care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Tommy, Osadchiy, Vadim, Weinberger, James M., Zheng, Michael H., Owen, Michael H., Leonard, Sarah A., Mills, Jesse N., Kachroo, Naveen, Eleswarapu, Sriram V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.1141
_version_ 1783743142681378816
author Jiang, Tommy
Osadchiy, Vadim
Weinberger, James M.
Zheng, Michael H.
Owen, Michael H.
Leonard, Sarah A.
Mills, Jesse N.
Kachroo, Naveen
Eleswarapu, Sriram V.
author_facet Jiang, Tommy
Osadchiy, Vadim
Weinberger, James M.
Zheng, Michael H.
Owen, Michael H.
Leonard, Sarah A.
Mills, Jesse N.
Kachroo, Naveen
Eleswarapu, Sriram V.
author_sort Jiang, Tommy
collection PubMed
description Background: Pandemic restrictions have changed how patients approach symptomatic kidney stones. We used a mixed-methods digital ethnographic approach to evaluate social media discussions about patient concerns and preferences for urolithiasis care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed kidney stone-related discussions on a large social media platform using qualitative analysis and natural language processing-based sentiment analysis. Posts were mined for demographic details, treatments pursued, and health care encounters. Pre-COVID-19 (January 1, 2020–February 29, 2020) and COVID-19 (March 1, 2020–June 1, 2020) posts were extracted from the popular online Reddit discussion board, “r/KidneyStones,” which is dedicated to discussions related to urolithiasis. Results: We extracted n = 649 posts (250 pre-COVID-19, 399 COVID-19); 150 from each cohort underwent thematic analysis and data extraction. Quantitative sentiment analysis was performed on 418 posts (179 pre-COVID-19, 239 COVID-19) that described stone-related decision making before intervention. Notable discussion themes during COVID-19 focused on barriers to care and concerns about stone management. Discussants exhibited more negative and anxious tones during COVID-19, based on sentiment analysis (p < 0.01). Patient preferences shifted away from in-person visits and procedures (p < 0.001). Mean reported stone size among those visiting emergency room (ER) increased from 5.1 to 10.5 mm (p < 0.001). The proportion of discussants preferring conservative management with stones ≥10 mm increased (12.5% pre-COVID-19 vs 26% during COVID-19, p = 0.002). Opioid mentions increased from 9% to 27% of posts (p < 0.001) and were most associated with conservative management discussions. Conclusions: Online discussion forums provide contemporaneous insight into patients' experiences during a time when traditional patient-centered research methodologies are limited due to social distancing. During the pandemic, patients with symptomatic kidney stones expressed anxiety regarding outpatient encounters and reluctance toward procedural intervention. Patients opted instead for at-home conservative treatment beyond clinical guidelines and reserved ER visits for larger stones, potentially causing self-harm. Opioid discussions proliferated, an alarming consequence of the pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8390773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83907732021-09-01 Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Preferences and Decision Making for Symptomatic Urolithiasis Jiang, Tommy Osadchiy, Vadim Weinberger, James M. Zheng, Michael H. Owen, Michael H. Leonard, Sarah A. Mills, Jesse N. Kachroo, Naveen Eleswarapu, Sriram V. J Endourol Experimental Endourology Background: Pandemic restrictions have changed how patients approach symptomatic kidney stones. We used a mixed-methods digital ethnographic approach to evaluate social media discussions about patient concerns and preferences for urolithiasis care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed kidney stone-related discussions on a large social media platform using qualitative analysis and natural language processing-based sentiment analysis. Posts were mined for demographic details, treatments pursued, and health care encounters. Pre-COVID-19 (January 1, 2020–February 29, 2020) and COVID-19 (March 1, 2020–June 1, 2020) posts were extracted from the popular online Reddit discussion board, “r/KidneyStones,” which is dedicated to discussions related to urolithiasis. Results: We extracted n = 649 posts (250 pre-COVID-19, 399 COVID-19); 150 from each cohort underwent thematic analysis and data extraction. Quantitative sentiment analysis was performed on 418 posts (179 pre-COVID-19, 239 COVID-19) that described stone-related decision making before intervention. Notable discussion themes during COVID-19 focused on barriers to care and concerns about stone management. Discussants exhibited more negative and anxious tones during COVID-19, based on sentiment analysis (p < 0.01). Patient preferences shifted away from in-person visits and procedures (p < 0.001). Mean reported stone size among those visiting emergency room (ER) increased from 5.1 to 10.5 mm (p < 0.001). The proportion of discussants preferring conservative management with stones ≥10 mm increased (12.5% pre-COVID-19 vs 26% during COVID-19, p = 0.002). Opioid mentions increased from 9% to 27% of posts (p < 0.001) and were most associated with conservative management discussions. Conclusions: Online discussion forums provide contemporaneous insight into patients' experiences during a time when traditional patient-centered research methodologies are limited due to social distancing. During the pandemic, patients with symptomatic kidney stones expressed anxiety regarding outpatient encounters and reluctance toward procedural intervention. Patients opted instead for at-home conservative treatment beyond clinical guidelines and reserved ER visits for larger stones, potentially causing self-harm. Opioid discussions proliferated, an alarming consequence of the pandemic. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-08-01 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8390773/ /pubmed/33478351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.1141 Text en © Tommy Jiang et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Experimental Endourology
Jiang, Tommy
Osadchiy, Vadim
Weinberger, James M.
Zheng, Michael H.
Owen, Michael H.
Leonard, Sarah A.
Mills, Jesse N.
Kachroo, Naveen
Eleswarapu, Sriram V.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Preferences and Decision Making for Symptomatic Urolithiasis
title Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Preferences and Decision Making for Symptomatic Urolithiasis
title_full Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Preferences and Decision Making for Symptomatic Urolithiasis
title_fullStr Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Preferences and Decision Making for Symptomatic Urolithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Preferences and Decision Making for Symptomatic Urolithiasis
title_short Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Preferences and Decision Making for Symptomatic Urolithiasis
title_sort impact of the covid-19 pandemic on patient preferences and decision making for symptomatic urolithiasis
topic Experimental Endourology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.1141
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangtommy impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatientpreferencesanddecisionmakingforsymptomaticurolithiasis
AT osadchiyvadim impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatientpreferencesanddecisionmakingforsymptomaticurolithiasis
AT weinbergerjamesm impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatientpreferencesanddecisionmakingforsymptomaticurolithiasis
AT zhengmichaelh impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatientpreferencesanddecisionmakingforsymptomaticurolithiasis
AT owenmichaelh impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatientpreferencesanddecisionmakingforsymptomaticurolithiasis
AT leonardsaraha impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatientpreferencesanddecisionmakingforsymptomaticurolithiasis
AT millsjessen impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatientpreferencesanddecisionmakingforsymptomaticurolithiasis
AT kachroonaveen impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatientpreferencesanddecisionmakingforsymptomaticurolithiasis
AT eleswarapusriramv impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatientpreferencesanddecisionmakingforsymptomaticurolithiasis