Cargando…
The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future
The development of a tracheal graft to replace long-segment defects has thwarted clinicians and engineers alike for over 100 years. To better understand the challenges facing this field today, we have consolidated all published reports of engineered tracheal grafts used to repair long-segment circum...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0238 |
_version_ | 1783743143135412224 |
---|---|
author | Greaney, Allison M. Niklason, Laura E. |
author_facet | Greaney, Allison M. Niklason, Laura E. |
author_sort | Greaney, Allison M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of a tracheal graft to replace long-segment defects has thwarted clinicians and engineers alike for over 100 years. To better understand the challenges facing this field today, we have consolidated all published reports of engineered tracheal grafts used to repair long-segment circumferential defects in humans, from the first in 1898 to the most recent in 2018, totaling 290 clinical cases. Distinct trends emerge in the types of grafts used over time, including repair using autologous fascia, rigid tubes of various inert materials, and pretreated cadaveric allografts. Our analysis of maximum clinical follow-up, as a proxy for graft performance, revealed that the Leuven protocol has a significantly longer clinical follow-up time than all other methods of airway reconstruction. This method involves transplanting a cadaveric tracheal allograft that is first prevascularized heterotopically in the recipient. We further quantified graft-related causes of mortality, revealing failure modes that have been resolved, and those that remain a hurdle, such as graft mechanics. Finally, we briefly summarize recent preclinical work in tracheal graft development. In conclusion, we synthesized top clinical care priorities and design criteria to inform and inspire collaboration between engineers and clinicians toward the development of a functional tracheal replacement graft. IMPACT STATEMENT: The field of tracheal engineering has floundered in recent years due to multiple article retractions. However, with recent advances in biofabrication and tissue analysis techniques, the field remains ripe for advancement through collaboration between engineers and clinicians. With a long history of clinical application of tracheal replacements, engineered tracheas are arguably the regenerative technology with the greatest potential for translation. This work describes the many phases of engineered tracheal replacements that have been applied in human patients over the past 100 years with the goal of carrying forward critical lessons into development of the next generation of engineered tracheal graft. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8390779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83907792021-09-01 The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future Greaney, Allison M. Niklason, Laura E. Tissue Eng Part B Rev Review Articles The development of a tracheal graft to replace long-segment defects has thwarted clinicians and engineers alike for over 100 years. To better understand the challenges facing this field today, we have consolidated all published reports of engineered tracheal grafts used to repair long-segment circumferential defects in humans, from the first in 1898 to the most recent in 2018, totaling 290 clinical cases. Distinct trends emerge in the types of grafts used over time, including repair using autologous fascia, rigid tubes of various inert materials, and pretreated cadaveric allografts. Our analysis of maximum clinical follow-up, as a proxy for graft performance, revealed that the Leuven protocol has a significantly longer clinical follow-up time than all other methods of airway reconstruction. This method involves transplanting a cadaveric tracheal allograft that is first prevascularized heterotopically in the recipient. We further quantified graft-related causes of mortality, revealing failure modes that have been resolved, and those that remain a hurdle, such as graft mechanics. Finally, we briefly summarize recent preclinical work in tracheal graft development. In conclusion, we synthesized top clinical care priorities and design criteria to inform and inspire collaboration between engineers and clinicians toward the development of a functional tracheal replacement graft. IMPACT STATEMENT: The field of tracheal engineering has floundered in recent years due to multiple article retractions. However, with recent advances in biofabrication and tissue analysis techniques, the field remains ripe for advancement through collaboration between engineers and clinicians. With a long history of clinical application of tracheal replacements, engineered tracheas are arguably the regenerative technology with the greatest potential for translation. This work describes the many phases of engineered tracheal replacements that have been applied in human patients over the past 100 years with the goal of carrying forward critical lessons into development of the next generation of engineered tracheal graft. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-08-01 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8390779/ /pubmed/33045942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0238 Text en © Allison M. Greaney, et al. 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License [CC-BY-NC] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Greaney, Allison M. Niklason, Laura E. The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future |
title | The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future |
title_full | The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future |
title_fullStr | The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future |
title_full_unstemmed | The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future |
title_short | The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future |
title_sort | history of engineered tracheal replacements: interpreting the past and guiding the future |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greaneyallisonm thehistoryofengineeredtrachealreplacementsinterpretingthepastandguidingthefuture AT niklasonlaurae thehistoryofengineeredtrachealreplacementsinterpretingthepastandguidingthefuture AT greaneyallisonm historyofengineeredtrachealreplacementsinterpretingthepastandguidingthefuture AT niklasonlaurae historyofengineeredtrachealreplacementsinterpretingthepastandguidingthefuture |