Cargando…

Assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes

Many social animals interact jointly, but only humans experience a specific sense of obligation toward their co-participants, a joint commitment. However, joint commitment is not only a mental state but also a process that reveals itself in the coordination efforts deployed during entry and exit pha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heesen, Raphaela, Bangerter, Adrian, Zuberbühler, Klaus, Iglesias, Katia, Neumann, Christof, Pajot, Aude, Perrenoud, Laura, Guéry, Jean-Pascal, Rossano, Federico, Genty, Emilie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102872
_version_ 1783743156457570304
author Heesen, Raphaela
Bangerter, Adrian
Zuberbühler, Klaus
Iglesias, Katia
Neumann, Christof
Pajot, Aude
Perrenoud, Laura
Guéry, Jean-Pascal
Rossano, Federico
Genty, Emilie
author_facet Heesen, Raphaela
Bangerter, Adrian
Zuberbühler, Klaus
Iglesias, Katia
Neumann, Christof
Pajot, Aude
Perrenoud, Laura
Guéry, Jean-Pascal
Rossano, Federico
Genty, Emilie
author_sort Heesen, Raphaela
collection PubMed
description Many social animals interact jointly, but only humans experience a specific sense of obligation toward their co-participants, a joint commitment. However, joint commitment is not only a mental state but also a process that reveals itself in the coordination efforts deployed during entry and exit phases of joint action. Here, we investigated the presence and duration of such phases in N = 1,242 natural play and grooming interactions of captive chimpanzees and bonobos. The apes frequently exchanged mutual gaze and communicative signals prior to and after engaging in joint activities with conspecifics, demonstrating entry and exit phases comparable to those of human joint activities. Although rank effects were less clear, phases in bonobos were more moderated by friendship compared to phases in chimpanzees, suggesting bonobos were more likely to reflect patterns analogous to human “face management”. This suggests that joint commitment as process was already present in our last common ancestor with Pan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8390869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83908692021-08-31 Assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes Heesen, Raphaela Bangerter, Adrian Zuberbühler, Klaus Iglesias, Katia Neumann, Christof Pajot, Aude Perrenoud, Laura Guéry, Jean-Pascal Rossano, Federico Genty, Emilie iScience Article Many social animals interact jointly, but only humans experience a specific sense of obligation toward their co-participants, a joint commitment. However, joint commitment is not only a mental state but also a process that reveals itself in the coordination efforts deployed during entry and exit phases of joint action. Here, we investigated the presence and duration of such phases in N = 1,242 natural play and grooming interactions of captive chimpanzees and bonobos. The apes frequently exchanged mutual gaze and communicative signals prior to and after engaging in joint activities with conspecifics, demonstrating entry and exit phases comparable to those of human joint activities. Although rank effects were less clear, phases in bonobos were more moderated by friendship compared to phases in chimpanzees, suggesting bonobos were more likely to reflect patterns analogous to human “face management”. This suggests that joint commitment as process was already present in our last common ancestor with Pan. Elsevier 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8390869/ /pubmed/34471860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102872 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Heesen, Raphaela
Bangerter, Adrian
Zuberbühler, Klaus
Iglesias, Katia
Neumann, Christof
Pajot, Aude
Perrenoud, Laura
Guéry, Jean-Pascal
Rossano, Federico
Genty, Emilie
Assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes
title Assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes
title_full Assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes
title_fullStr Assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes
title_full_unstemmed Assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes
title_short Assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes
title_sort assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102872
work_keys_str_mv AT heesenraphaela assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes
AT bangerteradrian assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes
AT zuberbuhlerklaus assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes
AT iglesiaskatia assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes
AT neumannchristof assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes
AT pajotaude assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes
AT perrenoudlaura assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes
AT gueryjeanpascal assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes
AT rossanofederico assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes
AT gentyemilie assessingjointcommitmentasaprocessingreatapes