Cargando…
Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter?
The increasing problem of antibiotic resistance in bacteria requires the development of new antimicrobial candidates. There are several well-known substances with commercial use, but their molecular mode of action is not fully understood. In this work, we focus on two commonly used antimicrobial age...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Biophysical Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34214528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.027 |
_version_ | 1783743188888977408 |
---|---|
author | Rzycki, Mateusz Drabik, Dominik Szostak-Paluch, Kamila Hanus-Lorenz, Beata Kraszewski, Sebastian |
author_facet | Rzycki, Mateusz Drabik, Dominik Szostak-Paluch, Kamila Hanus-Lorenz, Beata Kraszewski, Sebastian |
author_sort | Rzycki, Mateusz |
collection | PubMed |
description | The increasing problem of antibiotic resistance in bacteria requires the development of new antimicrobial candidates. There are several well-known substances with commercial use, but their molecular mode of action is not fully understood. In this work, we focus on two commonly used antimicrobial agents from the detergent family—octenidine dichloride (OCT) and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). Both of them are reported to be agents selectively attacking the cell membrane through interaction inducing membrane disruption by emulsification. They are believed to present electrostatic selectivity toward charged lipids. In this study, we tested this hypothesis and revised previously proposed molecular mechanisms of action. Employing a variety of techniques such as molecular dynamics, ζ potential with dynamic light scattering, vesicle fluctuation spectroscopy, carboxyfluorescein leakage measurement, and fluorescence trimethylammonium-diphenylhexatriene- and diphenylhexatriene-based studies for determination of OCT and CHX membrane location, we performed experimental studies using two model membrane systems—zwitterionic PC and negatively charged PG (18:1/18:1):PC (16:0/18:1) 3:7, respectively. These studies were extended by molecular dynamics simulations performed on a three-component bacterial membrane model system to further test interactions with another negatively charged lipid, cardiolipin. In summary, our study demonstrated that detergent selectivity is far more complicated than supposed simple electrostatic interactions. Although OCT does disrupt the membrane, our results suggest that its primary selectivity was more linked to mechanical properties of the membrane. On the other hand, CHX did not disrupt membranes as a primary activity, nor did it show any sign of electrostatic selectivity toward negatively charged membranes at any stage of interactions, which suggests membrane disruption by influencing more discrete membrane properties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8391085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Biophysical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83910852022-08-17 Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter? Rzycki, Mateusz Drabik, Dominik Szostak-Paluch, Kamila Hanus-Lorenz, Beata Kraszewski, Sebastian Biophys J Articles The increasing problem of antibiotic resistance in bacteria requires the development of new antimicrobial candidates. There are several well-known substances with commercial use, but their molecular mode of action is not fully understood. In this work, we focus on two commonly used antimicrobial agents from the detergent family—octenidine dichloride (OCT) and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). Both of them are reported to be agents selectively attacking the cell membrane through interaction inducing membrane disruption by emulsification. They are believed to present electrostatic selectivity toward charged lipids. In this study, we tested this hypothesis and revised previously proposed molecular mechanisms of action. Employing a variety of techniques such as molecular dynamics, ζ potential with dynamic light scattering, vesicle fluctuation spectroscopy, carboxyfluorescein leakage measurement, and fluorescence trimethylammonium-diphenylhexatriene- and diphenylhexatriene-based studies for determination of OCT and CHX membrane location, we performed experimental studies using two model membrane systems—zwitterionic PC and negatively charged PG (18:1/18:1):PC (16:0/18:1) 3:7, respectively. These studies were extended by molecular dynamics simulations performed on a three-component bacterial membrane model system to further test interactions with another negatively charged lipid, cardiolipin. In summary, our study demonstrated that detergent selectivity is far more complicated than supposed simple electrostatic interactions. Although OCT does disrupt the membrane, our results suggest that its primary selectivity was more linked to mechanical properties of the membrane. On the other hand, CHX did not disrupt membranes as a primary activity, nor did it show any sign of electrostatic selectivity toward negatively charged membranes at any stage of interactions, which suggests membrane disruption by influencing more discrete membrane properties. The Biophysical Society 2021-08-17 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8391085/ /pubmed/34214528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.027 Text en © 2021 Biophysical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Rzycki, Mateusz Drabik, Dominik Szostak-Paluch, Kamila Hanus-Lorenz, Beata Kraszewski, Sebastian Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter? |
title | Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter? |
title_full | Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter? |
title_fullStr | Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter? |
title_short | Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter? |
title_sort | unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: does electrostatics matter? |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34214528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rzyckimateusz unravelingthemechanismofoctenidineandchlorhexidineonmembranesdoeselectrostaticsmatter AT drabikdominik unravelingthemechanismofoctenidineandchlorhexidineonmembranesdoeselectrostaticsmatter AT szostakpaluchkamila unravelingthemechanismofoctenidineandchlorhexidineonmembranesdoeselectrostaticsmatter AT hanuslorenzbeata unravelingthemechanismofoctenidineandchlorhexidineonmembranesdoeselectrostaticsmatter AT kraszewskisebastian unravelingthemechanismofoctenidineandchlorhexidineonmembranesdoeselectrostaticsmatter |