Cargando…

Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students

Factors influencing students’ learning satisfaction may differ between face-to-face and non-face-to-face flipped learning. For non-face-to-face flipped learning, which was widely employed during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to examine the impacts on learning satisfaction, which may vary de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Mi-Kyoung, Kim, Mi Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168641
_version_ 1783743212317310976
author Cho, Mi-Kyoung
Kim, Mi Young
author_facet Cho, Mi-Kyoung
Kim, Mi Young
author_sort Cho, Mi-Kyoung
collection PubMed
description Factors influencing students’ learning satisfaction may differ between face-to-face and non-face-to-face flipped learning. For non-face-to-face flipped learning, which was widely employed during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to examine the impacts on learning satisfaction, which may vary depending on professor–student interaction rather than individual competencies, such as SDL readiness. This descriptive study, conducted 2 March 2019 to 24 June 2020, included 89 s-year, flipped-learning nursing students (28 face-to-face, 61 non-face-to-face). Students completed questionnaires about learning satisfaction, SDL readiness, and professor–student interaction. The data, collected using e-surveys, were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple stepwise regression with IBM’s SPSS Statistics 25.0 program. The total average score of learning satisfaction (38.19 ± 6.04) was positively correlated with SDL readiness (r = 0.56, p < 0.001) and professor–student interaction (r = 0.36, p = 0.001), although total learning satisfaction was significantly different between the face-to-face and the non-face-to-face groups (t = 5.28, p = 0.024). They were also significant influencing factors, along with face-to-face flipped learning, for total learning satisfaction (F = 18.00, p < 0.001, explanatory power = 36.7%), suggesting flipped learners in non-face-to-face contexts must increase engagement beyond professor–student interaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8391188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83911882021-08-28 Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students Cho, Mi-Kyoung Kim, Mi Young Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Factors influencing students’ learning satisfaction may differ between face-to-face and non-face-to-face flipped learning. For non-face-to-face flipped learning, which was widely employed during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to examine the impacts on learning satisfaction, which may vary depending on professor–student interaction rather than individual competencies, such as SDL readiness. This descriptive study, conducted 2 March 2019 to 24 June 2020, included 89 s-year, flipped-learning nursing students (28 face-to-face, 61 non-face-to-face). Students completed questionnaires about learning satisfaction, SDL readiness, and professor–student interaction. The data, collected using e-surveys, were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple stepwise regression with IBM’s SPSS Statistics 25.0 program. The total average score of learning satisfaction (38.19 ± 6.04) was positively correlated with SDL readiness (r = 0.56, p < 0.001) and professor–student interaction (r = 0.36, p = 0.001), although total learning satisfaction was significantly different between the face-to-face and the non-face-to-face groups (t = 5.28, p = 0.024). They were also significant influencing factors, along with face-to-face flipped learning, for total learning satisfaction (F = 18.00, p < 0.001, explanatory power = 36.7%), suggesting flipped learners in non-face-to-face contexts must increase engagement beyond professor–student interaction. MDPI 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8391188/ /pubmed/34444396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168641 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cho, Mi-Kyoung
Kim, Mi Young
Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students
title Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students
title_full Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students
title_short Factors Affecting Learning Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Non-Face-to-Face Flipped Learning among Nursing Students
title_sort factors affecting learning satisfaction in face-to-face and non-face-to-face flipped learning among nursing students
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168641
work_keys_str_mv AT chomikyoung factorsaffectinglearningsatisfactioninfacetofaceandnonfacetofaceflippedlearningamongnursingstudents
AT kimmiyoung factorsaffectinglearningsatisfactioninfacetofaceandnonfacetofaceflippedlearningamongnursingstudents