Cargando…
PPAR-Responsive Elements Enriched with Alu Repeats May Contribute to Distinctive PPARγ–DNMT1 Interactions in the Genome
SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study aimed to explore the potential role of PPARγ–DNMT1 interaction through PPAR-responsive elements (PPREs), which we have found to be enriched with Alu repeats. Apart from protein–protein interactions and co-expression in multiple cancer types, we exclusively described a prog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34439147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13163993 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study aimed to explore the potential role of PPARγ–DNMT1 interaction through PPAR-responsive elements (PPREs), which we have found to be enriched with Alu repeats. Apart from protein–protein interactions and co-expression in multiple cancer types, we exclusively described a prognostic role for PPARγ in uveal melanoma (UM). ABSTRACT: Background: PPARγ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma) is involved in the pathology of numerous diseases, including UM and other types of cancer. Emerging evidence suggests that an interaction between PPARγ and DNMTs (DNA methyltransferase) plays a role in cancer that is yet to be defined. Methods: The configuration of the repeating elements was performed with CAP3 and MAFFT, and the structural modelling was conducted with HDOCK. An evolutionary action scores algorithm was used to identify oncogenic variants. A systematic bioinformatic appraisal of PPARγ and DNMT1 was performed across 29 tumor types and UM available in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Results: PPAR-responsive elements (PPREs) enriched with Alu repeats are associated with different genomic regions, particularly the promotor region of DNMT1. PPARγ–DNMT1 co-expression is significantly associated with several cancers. C-terminals of PPARγ and DNMT1 appear to be the potential protein–protein interaction sites where disease-specific mutations may directly impair the respective protein functions. Furthermore, PPARγ expression could be identified as an additional prognostic marker for UM. Conclusions: We hypothesize that the function of PPARγ requires an additional contribution of Alu repeats which may directly influence the DNMT1 network. Regarding UM, PPARγ appears to be an additional discriminatory prognostic marker, in particular in disomy 3 tumors. |
---|