Cargando…
Comparing the Impact of Multi-Session Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Primary Motor Cortex Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nrTMS) on Chronic Pain Patients
Repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to produce an analgesic effect and therefore has a potential for treating chronic refractory pain. However, previous studies used various stimulation parameters (including cortical targets), and the best stimulation protocol is not yet identi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34439580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080961 |
_version_ | 1783743297854898176 |
---|---|
author | Freigang, Sascha Lehner, Christian Fresnoza, Shane M. Mahdy Ali, Kariem Hlavka, Elisabeth Eitler, Annika Szilagyi, Istvan Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar Deutschmann, Hannes Reishofer, Gernot Berlec, Anže Kurschel-Lackner, Senta Valentin, Antonio Sutter, Bernhard Zaar, Karla Mokry, Michael |
author_facet | Freigang, Sascha Lehner, Christian Fresnoza, Shane M. Mahdy Ali, Kariem Hlavka, Elisabeth Eitler, Annika Szilagyi, Istvan Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar Deutschmann, Hannes Reishofer, Gernot Berlec, Anže Kurschel-Lackner, Senta Valentin, Antonio Sutter, Bernhard Zaar, Karla Mokry, Michael |
author_sort | Freigang, Sascha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to produce an analgesic effect and therefore has a potential for treating chronic refractory pain. However, previous studies used various stimulation parameters (including cortical targets), and the best stimulation protocol is not yet identified. The present study investigated the effects of multi-session 20 Hz (2000 pulses) and 5 Hz (1800 pulses) rTMS stimulation of left motor cortex (M1-group) and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC-group), respectively. The M1-group (n = 9) and DLPFC-group (n = 7) completed 13 sessions of neuronavigated stimulation, while a Sham-group (n = 8) completed seven sessions of placebo stimulation. The outcome was measured using the German Pain Questionnaire (GPQ), Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS), and SF-12 questionnaire. Pain perception significantly decreased in the DLPFC-group (38.17%) compared to the M1-group (56.11%) (p ≤ 0.001) on the later sessions. Health-related quality of life also improved in the DLPFC-group (40.47) compared to the Sham-group (35.06) (p = 0.016), and mental composite summary (p = 0.001) in the DLPFC-group (49.12) compared to M1-group (39.46). Stimulation of the left DLPFC resulted in pain relief, while M1 stimulation was not effective. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to identify optimal cortical target sites and stimulation parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8391537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83915372021-08-28 Comparing the Impact of Multi-Session Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Primary Motor Cortex Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nrTMS) on Chronic Pain Patients Freigang, Sascha Lehner, Christian Fresnoza, Shane M. Mahdy Ali, Kariem Hlavka, Elisabeth Eitler, Annika Szilagyi, Istvan Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar Deutschmann, Hannes Reishofer, Gernot Berlec, Anže Kurschel-Lackner, Senta Valentin, Antonio Sutter, Bernhard Zaar, Karla Mokry, Michael Brain Sci Article Repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to produce an analgesic effect and therefore has a potential for treating chronic refractory pain. However, previous studies used various stimulation parameters (including cortical targets), and the best stimulation protocol is not yet identified. The present study investigated the effects of multi-session 20 Hz (2000 pulses) and 5 Hz (1800 pulses) rTMS stimulation of left motor cortex (M1-group) and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC-group), respectively. The M1-group (n = 9) and DLPFC-group (n = 7) completed 13 sessions of neuronavigated stimulation, while a Sham-group (n = 8) completed seven sessions of placebo stimulation. The outcome was measured using the German Pain Questionnaire (GPQ), Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS), and SF-12 questionnaire. Pain perception significantly decreased in the DLPFC-group (38.17%) compared to the M1-group (56.11%) (p ≤ 0.001) on the later sessions. Health-related quality of life also improved in the DLPFC-group (40.47) compared to the Sham-group (35.06) (p = 0.016), and mental composite summary (p = 0.001) in the DLPFC-group (49.12) compared to M1-group (39.46). Stimulation of the left DLPFC resulted in pain relief, while M1 stimulation was not effective. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to identify optimal cortical target sites and stimulation parameters. MDPI 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8391537/ /pubmed/34439580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080961 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Freigang, Sascha Lehner, Christian Fresnoza, Shane M. Mahdy Ali, Kariem Hlavka, Elisabeth Eitler, Annika Szilagyi, Istvan Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar Deutschmann, Hannes Reishofer, Gernot Berlec, Anže Kurschel-Lackner, Senta Valentin, Antonio Sutter, Bernhard Zaar, Karla Mokry, Michael Comparing the Impact of Multi-Session Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Primary Motor Cortex Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nrTMS) on Chronic Pain Patients |
title | Comparing the Impact of Multi-Session Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Primary Motor Cortex Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nrTMS) on Chronic Pain Patients |
title_full | Comparing the Impact of Multi-Session Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Primary Motor Cortex Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nrTMS) on Chronic Pain Patients |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Impact of Multi-Session Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Primary Motor Cortex Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nrTMS) on Chronic Pain Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Impact of Multi-Session Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Primary Motor Cortex Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nrTMS) on Chronic Pain Patients |
title_short | Comparing the Impact of Multi-Session Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Primary Motor Cortex Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nrTMS) on Chronic Pain Patients |
title_sort | comparing the impact of multi-session left dorsolateral prefrontal and primary motor cortex neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrtms) on chronic pain patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34439580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freigangsascha comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT lehnerchristian comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT fresnozashanem comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT mahdyalikariem comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT hlavkaelisabeth comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT eitlerannika comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT szilagyiistvan comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT bornemanncimentihelmar comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT deutschmannhannes comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT reishofergernot comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT berlecanze comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT kurschellacknersenta comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT valentinantonio comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT sutterbernhard comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT zaarkarla comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients AT mokrymichael comparingtheimpactofmultisessionleftdorsolateralprefrontalandprimarymotorcortexneuronavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationnrtmsonchronicpainpatients |