Cargando…

Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms

Despite many advancements in recent years for the sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions, the diagnostic yield remains low. Initial excitement about the current electromagnetic navigation platforms has subsided as the real-world data shows a significantly lower diagnostic sensitivity of ~70%. “CT-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Abhishek, Caceres, Jose D., Vaithilingam, Siddharthan, Sandhu, Gurshan, Meena, Nikhil K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081479
_version_ 1783743382117416960
author Kumar, Abhishek
Caceres, Jose D.
Vaithilingam, Siddharthan
Sandhu, Gurshan
Meena, Nikhil K.
author_facet Kumar, Abhishek
Caceres, Jose D.
Vaithilingam, Siddharthan
Sandhu, Gurshan
Meena, Nikhil K.
author_sort Kumar, Abhishek
collection PubMed
description Despite many advancements in recent years for the sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions, the diagnostic yield remains low. Initial excitement about the current electromagnetic navigation platforms has subsided as the real-world data shows a significantly lower diagnostic sensitivity of ~70%. “CT-to-body divergence” has been identified as a major limitation of this modality. In-tandem use of the ultrathin bronchoscope and radial endobronchial ultrasound probe has yielded only comparable results, attributable to the limited peripheral reach, device maneuverability, stability, and distractors like atelectasis. As such, experts have identified three key steps in peripheral nodule sampling—navigation (to the lesion), confirmation (of the correct location), and acquisition (tissue sampling by tools). Robotic bronchoscopy (RB) is a novel innovation that aspires to improve upon these aspects and consequently, achieve a better diagnostic yield. Through this publication, we aim to review the technical aspects, safety, feasibility, and early efficacy data for this new diagnostic modality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8391906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83919062021-08-28 Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms Kumar, Abhishek Caceres, Jose D. Vaithilingam, Siddharthan Sandhu, Gurshan Meena, Nikhil K. Diagnostics (Basel) Review Despite many advancements in recent years for the sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions, the diagnostic yield remains low. Initial excitement about the current electromagnetic navigation platforms has subsided as the real-world data shows a significantly lower diagnostic sensitivity of ~70%. “CT-to-body divergence” has been identified as a major limitation of this modality. In-tandem use of the ultrathin bronchoscope and radial endobronchial ultrasound probe has yielded only comparable results, attributable to the limited peripheral reach, device maneuverability, stability, and distractors like atelectasis. As such, experts have identified three key steps in peripheral nodule sampling—navigation (to the lesion), confirmation (of the correct location), and acquisition (tissue sampling by tools). Robotic bronchoscopy (RB) is a novel innovation that aspires to improve upon these aspects and consequently, achieve a better diagnostic yield. Through this publication, we aim to review the technical aspects, safety, feasibility, and early efficacy data for this new diagnostic modality. MDPI 2021-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8391906/ /pubmed/34441413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081479 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kumar, Abhishek
Caceres, Jose D.
Vaithilingam, Siddharthan
Sandhu, Gurshan
Meena, Nikhil K.
Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms
title Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms
title_full Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms
title_fullStr Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms
title_short Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms
title_sort robotic bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesion biopsy: evidence-based review of the two platforms
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081479
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarabhishek roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms
AT caceresjosed roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms
AT vaithilingamsiddharthan roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms
AT sandhugurshan roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms
AT meenanikhilk roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms