Cargando…
Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms
Despite many advancements in recent years for the sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions, the diagnostic yield remains low. Initial excitement about the current electromagnetic navigation platforms has subsided as the real-world data shows a significantly lower diagnostic sensitivity of ~70%. “CT-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081479 |
_version_ | 1783743382117416960 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Abhishek Caceres, Jose D. Vaithilingam, Siddharthan Sandhu, Gurshan Meena, Nikhil K. |
author_facet | Kumar, Abhishek Caceres, Jose D. Vaithilingam, Siddharthan Sandhu, Gurshan Meena, Nikhil K. |
author_sort | Kumar, Abhishek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite many advancements in recent years for the sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions, the diagnostic yield remains low. Initial excitement about the current electromagnetic navigation platforms has subsided as the real-world data shows a significantly lower diagnostic sensitivity of ~70%. “CT-to-body divergence” has been identified as a major limitation of this modality. In-tandem use of the ultrathin bronchoscope and radial endobronchial ultrasound probe has yielded only comparable results, attributable to the limited peripheral reach, device maneuverability, stability, and distractors like atelectasis. As such, experts have identified three key steps in peripheral nodule sampling—navigation (to the lesion), confirmation (of the correct location), and acquisition (tissue sampling by tools). Robotic bronchoscopy (RB) is a novel innovation that aspires to improve upon these aspects and consequently, achieve a better diagnostic yield. Through this publication, we aim to review the technical aspects, safety, feasibility, and early efficacy data for this new diagnostic modality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8391906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83919062021-08-28 Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms Kumar, Abhishek Caceres, Jose D. Vaithilingam, Siddharthan Sandhu, Gurshan Meena, Nikhil K. Diagnostics (Basel) Review Despite many advancements in recent years for the sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions, the diagnostic yield remains low. Initial excitement about the current electromagnetic navigation platforms has subsided as the real-world data shows a significantly lower diagnostic sensitivity of ~70%. “CT-to-body divergence” has been identified as a major limitation of this modality. In-tandem use of the ultrathin bronchoscope and radial endobronchial ultrasound probe has yielded only comparable results, attributable to the limited peripheral reach, device maneuverability, stability, and distractors like atelectasis. As such, experts have identified three key steps in peripheral nodule sampling—navigation (to the lesion), confirmation (of the correct location), and acquisition (tissue sampling by tools). Robotic bronchoscopy (RB) is a novel innovation that aspires to improve upon these aspects and consequently, achieve a better diagnostic yield. Through this publication, we aim to review the technical aspects, safety, feasibility, and early efficacy data for this new diagnostic modality. MDPI 2021-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8391906/ /pubmed/34441413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081479 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kumar, Abhishek Caceres, Jose D. Vaithilingam, Siddharthan Sandhu, Gurshan Meena, Nikhil K. Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms |
title | Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms |
title_full | Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms |
title_fullStr | Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms |
title_short | Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesion Biopsy: Evidence-Based Review of the Two Platforms |
title_sort | robotic bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesion biopsy: evidence-based review of the two platforms |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarabhishek roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms AT caceresjosed roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms AT vaithilingamsiddharthan roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms AT sandhugurshan roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms AT meenanikhilk roboticbronchoscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesionbiopsyevidencebasedreviewofthetwoplatforms |