Cargando…

Reducing Decision to Incision Time Interval for Emergency Cesarean Sections: 24 Months’ Experience from Rural Sierra Leone

Background: This study aimed at describing the changes in the completeness of documentation and changes in decision to incision time interval of emergency cesarean sections after an audit and feedback project a rural hospital in Sierra Leone. Methods: We documented and monitored the decision and inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tucker, Lahai, Frühauf, Anna, Dumbuya, Isata, Muwanguzi, Paul, Lado, Marta, Lavallie, Daniel, Sheku, Mohamed, Kachimanga, Chiyembekezo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8392021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444330
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168581
_version_ 1783743408621223936
author Tucker, Lahai
Frühauf, Anna
Dumbuya, Isata
Muwanguzi, Paul
Lado, Marta
Lavallie, Daniel
Sheku, Mohamed
Kachimanga, Chiyembekezo
author_facet Tucker, Lahai
Frühauf, Anna
Dumbuya, Isata
Muwanguzi, Paul
Lado, Marta
Lavallie, Daniel
Sheku, Mohamed
Kachimanga, Chiyembekezo
author_sort Tucker, Lahai
collection PubMed
description Background: This study aimed at describing the changes in the completeness of documentation and changes in decision to incision time interval of emergency cesarean sections after an audit and feedback project a rural hospital in Sierra Leone. Methods: We documented and monitored the decision and incision times for emergency cesarean sections over the course of two years. Year one focused on the introduction of the project and year two focused on the continuous monitoring of the project. We compared the completeness of decision to incision data and used the 30-min benchmark as target for the decision to incision time interval. Results: A total of 762 emergency cesarean sections were included. While the completion of decision time data (72%) did not change between the two reporting periods, documentation of incision time increased from 95% to 98% (p < 0.001). Complete documentation for both decision and incision time was available for 540 (70.9%) emergency cesarean sections. The decision to incision time interval decreased from 105 min to 42 min (p < 0.001). The proportion of cesarean sections started within 30 min increased from 8.5% to 37% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Although not all cesarean sections were performed within the 30-min threshold, the decision to incision interval decreased significantly. Improvements in documentation and routine reporting of the decision to incision time interval is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8392021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83920212021-08-28 Reducing Decision to Incision Time Interval for Emergency Cesarean Sections: 24 Months’ Experience from Rural Sierra Leone Tucker, Lahai Frühauf, Anna Dumbuya, Isata Muwanguzi, Paul Lado, Marta Lavallie, Daniel Sheku, Mohamed Kachimanga, Chiyembekezo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: This study aimed at describing the changes in the completeness of documentation and changes in decision to incision time interval of emergency cesarean sections after an audit and feedback project a rural hospital in Sierra Leone. Methods: We documented and monitored the decision and incision times for emergency cesarean sections over the course of two years. Year one focused on the introduction of the project and year two focused on the continuous monitoring of the project. We compared the completeness of decision to incision data and used the 30-min benchmark as target for the decision to incision time interval. Results: A total of 762 emergency cesarean sections were included. While the completion of decision time data (72%) did not change between the two reporting periods, documentation of incision time increased from 95% to 98% (p < 0.001). Complete documentation for both decision and incision time was available for 540 (70.9%) emergency cesarean sections. The decision to incision time interval decreased from 105 min to 42 min (p < 0.001). The proportion of cesarean sections started within 30 min increased from 8.5% to 37% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Although not all cesarean sections were performed within the 30-min threshold, the decision to incision interval decreased significantly. Improvements in documentation and routine reporting of the decision to incision time interval is recommended. MDPI 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8392021/ /pubmed/34444330 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168581 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tucker, Lahai
Frühauf, Anna
Dumbuya, Isata
Muwanguzi, Paul
Lado, Marta
Lavallie, Daniel
Sheku, Mohamed
Kachimanga, Chiyembekezo
Reducing Decision to Incision Time Interval for Emergency Cesarean Sections: 24 Months’ Experience from Rural Sierra Leone
title Reducing Decision to Incision Time Interval for Emergency Cesarean Sections: 24 Months’ Experience from Rural Sierra Leone
title_full Reducing Decision to Incision Time Interval for Emergency Cesarean Sections: 24 Months’ Experience from Rural Sierra Leone
title_fullStr Reducing Decision to Incision Time Interval for Emergency Cesarean Sections: 24 Months’ Experience from Rural Sierra Leone
title_full_unstemmed Reducing Decision to Incision Time Interval for Emergency Cesarean Sections: 24 Months’ Experience from Rural Sierra Leone
title_short Reducing Decision to Incision Time Interval for Emergency Cesarean Sections: 24 Months’ Experience from Rural Sierra Leone
title_sort reducing decision to incision time interval for emergency cesarean sections: 24 months’ experience from rural sierra leone
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8392021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444330
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168581
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckerlahai reducingdecisiontoincisiontimeintervalforemergencycesareansections24monthsexperiencefromruralsierraleone
AT fruhaufanna reducingdecisiontoincisiontimeintervalforemergencycesareansections24monthsexperiencefromruralsierraleone
AT dumbuyaisata reducingdecisiontoincisiontimeintervalforemergencycesareansections24monthsexperiencefromruralsierraleone
AT muwanguzipaul reducingdecisiontoincisiontimeintervalforemergencycesareansections24monthsexperiencefromruralsierraleone
AT ladomarta reducingdecisiontoincisiontimeintervalforemergencycesareansections24monthsexperiencefromruralsierraleone
AT lavalliedaniel reducingdecisiontoincisiontimeintervalforemergencycesareansections24monthsexperiencefromruralsierraleone
AT shekumohamed reducingdecisiontoincisiontimeintervalforemergencycesareansections24monthsexperiencefromruralsierraleone
AT kachimangachiyembekezo reducingdecisiontoincisiontimeintervalforemergencycesareansections24monthsexperiencefromruralsierraleone