Cargando…

Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research

Case study methodology has grown in popularity within Health Services Research (HSR). However, its use and merit as a methodology are frequently criticized due to its flexible approach and inconsistent application. Nevertheless, case study methodology is well suited to HSR because it can track and e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sibbald, Shannon L., Paciocco, Stefan, Fournie, Meghan, Van Asseldonk, Rachelle, Scurr, Tiffany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8392758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08404704211028857
_version_ 1783743577430425600
author Sibbald, Shannon L.
Paciocco, Stefan
Fournie, Meghan
Van Asseldonk, Rachelle
Scurr, Tiffany
author_facet Sibbald, Shannon L.
Paciocco, Stefan
Fournie, Meghan
Van Asseldonk, Rachelle
Scurr, Tiffany
author_sort Sibbald, Shannon L.
collection PubMed
description Case study methodology has grown in popularity within Health Services Research (HSR). However, its use and merit as a methodology are frequently criticized due to its flexible approach and inconsistent application. Nevertheless, case study methodology is well suited to HSR because it can track and examine complex relationships, contexts, and systems as they evolve. Applied appropriately, it can help generate information on how multiple forms of knowledge come together to inform decision-making within healthcare contexts. In this article, we aim to demystify case study methodology by outlining its philosophical underpinnings and three foundational approaches. We provide literature-based guidance to decision-makers, policy-makers, and health leaders on how to engage in and critically appraise case study design. We advocate that researchers work in collaboration with health leaders to detail their research process with an aim of strengthening the validity and integrity of case study for its continued and advanced use in HSR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8392758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83927582021-08-28 Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research Sibbald, Shannon L. Paciocco, Stefan Fournie, Meghan Van Asseldonk, Rachelle Scurr, Tiffany Healthc Manage Forum Original Articles Case study methodology has grown in popularity within Health Services Research (HSR). However, its use and merit as a methodology are frequently criticized due to its flexible approach and inconsistent application. Nevertheless, case study methodology is well suited to HSR because it can track and examine complex relationships, contexts, and systems as they evolve. Applied appropriately, it can help generate information on how multiple forms of knowledge come together to inform decision-making within healthcare contexts. In this article, we aim to demystify case study methodology by outlining its philosophical underpinnings and three foundational approaches. We provide literature-based guidance to decision-makers, policy-makers, and health leaders on how to engage in and critically appraise case study design. We advocate that researchers work in collaboration with health leaders to detail their research process with an aim of strengthening the validity and integrity of case study for its continued and advanced use in HSR. SAGE Publications 2021-07-06 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8392758/ /pubmed/34227408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08404704211028857 Text en © 2021 The Canadian College of Health Leaders https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sibbald, Shannon L.
Paciocco, Stefan
Fournie, Meghan
Van Asseldonk, Rachelle
Scurr, Tiffany
Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research
title Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research
title_full Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research
title_fullStr Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research
title_full_unstemmed Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research
title_short Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research
title_sort continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8392758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08404704211028857
work_keys_str_mv AT sibbaldshannonl continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch
AT pacioccostefan continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch
AT fourniemeghan continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch
AT vanasseldonkrachelle continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch
AT scurrtiffany continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch