Cargando…
Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research
Case study methodology has grown in popularity within Health Services Research (HSR). However, its use and merit as a methodology are frequently criticized due to its flexible approach and inconsistent application. Nevertheless, case study methodology is well suited to HSR because it can track and e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8392758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08404704211028857 |
_version_ | 1783743577430425600 |
---|---|
author | Sibbald, Shannon L. Paciocco, Stefan Fournie, Meghan Van Asseldonk, Rachelle Scurr, Tiffany |
author_facet | Sibbald, Shannon L. Paciocco, Stefan Fournie, Meghan Van Asseldonk, Rachelle Scurr, Tiffany |
author_sort | Sibbald, Shannon L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Case study methodology has grown in popularity within Health Services Research (HSR). However, its use and merit as a methodology are frequently criticized due to its flexible approach and inconsistent application. Nevertheless, case study methodology is well suited to HSR because it can track and examine complex relationships, contexts, and systems as they evolve. Applied appropriately, it can help generate information on how multiple forms of knowledge come together to inform decision-making within healthcare contexts. In this article, we aim to demystify case study methodology by outlining its philosophical underpinnings and three foundational approaches. We provide literature-based guidance to decision-makers, policy-makers, and health leaders on how to engage in and critically appraise case study design. We advocate that researchers work in collaboration with health leaders to detail their research process with an aim of strengthening the validity and integrity of case study for its continued and advanced use in HSR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8392758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83927582021-08-28 Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research Sibbald, Shannon L. Paciocco, Stefan Fournie, Meghan Van Asseldonk, Rachelle Scurr, Tiffany Healthc Manage Forum Original Articles Case study methodology has grown in popularity within Health Services Research (HSR). However, its use and merit as a methodology are frequently criticized due to its flexible approach and inconsistent application. Nevertheless, case study methodology is well suited to HSR because it can track and examine complex relationships, contexts, and systems as they evolve. Applied appropriately, it can help generate information on how multiple forms of knowledge come together to inform decision-making within healthcare contexts. In this article, we aim to demystify case study methodology by outlining its philosophical underpinnings and three foundational approaches. We provide literature-based guidance to decision-makers, policy-makers, and health leaders on how to engage in and critically appraise case study design. We advocate that researchers work in collaboration with health leaders to detail their research process with an aim of strengthening the validity and integrity of case study for its continued and advanced use in HSR. SAGE Publications 2021-07-06 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8392758/ /pubmed/34227408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08404704211028857 Text en © 2021 The Canadian College of Health Leaders https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sibbald, Shannon L. Paciocco, Stefan Fournie, Meghan Van Asseldonk, Rachelle Scurr, Tiffany Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research |
title | Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research |
title_full | Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research |
title_fullStr | Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research |
title_short | Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research |
title_sort | continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8392758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08404704211028857 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sibbaldshannonl continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch AT pacioccostefan continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch AT fourniemeghan continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch AT vanasseldonkrachelle continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch AT scurrtiffany continuingtoenhancethequalityofcasestudymethodologyinhealthservicesresearch |