Cargando…
Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study
The aim of this work was to compare selected physicochemical properties of air dried ‘Golden Delicious’ apples, pretreated either by high-pressure processing (HPP), ultrasound (US) or pulsed electric field (PEF). Following parameters of pretreatment were used: HPP–400 MPa for 15 min, US–21 kHz, 180...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081943 |
_version_ | 1783743691945410560 |
---|---|
author | Wiktor, Artur Landfeld, Aleš Matys, Aleksandra Novotná, Pavla Dadan, Magdalena Kováříková, Eliška Nowacka, Malgorzata Mulenko, Martin Witrowa-Rajchert, Dorota Strohalm, Jan Houška, Milan |
author_facet | Wiktor, Artur Landfeld, Aleš Matys, Aleksandra Novotná, Pavla Dadan, Magdalena Kováříková, Eliška Nowacka, Malgorzata Mulenko, Martin Witrowa-Rajchert, Dorota Strohalm, Jan Houška, Milan |
author_sort | Wiktor, Artur |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this work was to compare selected physicochemical properties of air dried ‘Golden Delicious’ apples, pretreated either by high-pressure processing (HPP), ultrasound (US) or pulsed electric field (PEF). Following parameters of pretreatment were used: HPP–400 MPa for 15 min, US–21 kHz, 180 W for 45 min, PEF–1 kV/cm, 3.5 kJ/kg. The quality of materials was evaluated by their rehydration properties, hygroscopicity, color and total phenolic content. To compare the effectiveness of the utilized methods, determined properties were expressed as relative comparison values against the reference sample obtained without any pretreatment in the same conditions. The performed research demonstrated that properties can be shaped by the application of proper pretreatment methods. For instance, PEF was shown to be the best method for improving water uptake during rehydration, whereas HPP was the most effective in decreasing hygroscopic properties in comparison with untreated dried apples. Among the investigated methods, HPP resulted in the deepest browning and thus total color difference, while the effects of US and PEF were comparable. For all pretreated dried apples, the total phenolic content was lower when compared with reference material, though the smallest drop was found in sonicated samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8393259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83932592021-08-28 Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study Wiktor, Artur Landfeld, Aleš Matys, Aleksandra Novotná, Pavla Dadan, Magdalena Kováříková, Eliška Nowacka, Malgorzata Mulenko, Martin Witrowa-Rajchert, Dorota Strohalm, Jan Houška, Milan Foods Article The aim of this work was to compare selected physicochemical properties of air dried ‘Golden Delicious’ apples, pretreated either by high-pressure processing (HPP), ultrasound (US) or pulsed electric field (PEF). Following parameters of pretreatment were used: HPP–400 MPa for 15 min, US–21 kHz, 180 W for 45 min, PEF–1 kV/cm, 3.5 kJ/kg. The quality of materials was evaluated by their rehydration properties, hygroscopicity, color and total phenolic content. To compare the effectiveness of the utilized methods, determined properties were expressed as relative comparison values against the reference sample obtained without any pretreatment in the same conditions. The performed research demonstrated that properties can be shaped by the application of proper pretreatment methods. For instance, PEF was shown to be the best method for improving water uptake during rehydration, whereas HPP was the most effective in decreasing hygroscopic properties in comparison with untreated dried apples. Among the investigated methods, HPP resulted in the deepest browning and thus total color difference, while the effects of US and PEF were comparable. For all pretreated dried apples, the total phenolic content was lower when compared with reference material, though the smallest drop was found in sonicated samples. MDPI 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8393259/ /pubmed/34441719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081943 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wiktor, Artur Landfeld, Aleš Matys, Aleksandra Novotná, Pavla Dadan, Magdalena Kováříková, Eliška Nowacka, Malgorzata Mulenko, Martin Witrowa-Rajchert, Dorota Strohalm, Jan Houška, Milan Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study |
title | Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study |
title_full | Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study |
title_fullStr | Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study |
title_short | Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study |
title_sort | selected quality parameters of air-dried apples pretreated by high pressure, ultrasounds and pulsed electric field—a comparison study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081943 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiktorartur selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT landfeldales selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT matysaleksandra selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT novotnapavla selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT dadanmagdalena selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT kovarikovaeliska selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT nowackamalgorzata selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT mulenkomartin selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT witrowarajchertdorota selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT strohalmjan selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy AT houskamilan selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy |