Cargando…

Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study

The aim of this work was to compare selected physicochemical properties of air dried ‘Golden Delicious’ apples, pretreated either by high-pressure processing (HPP), ultrasound (US) or pulsed electric field (PEF). Following parameters of pretreatment were used: HPP–400 MPa for 15 min, US–21 kHz, 180...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiktor, Artur, Landfeld, Aleš, Matys, Aleksandra, Novotná, Pavla, Dadan, Magdalena, Kováříková, Eliška, Nowacka, Malgorzata, Mulenko, Martin, Witrowa-Rajchert, Dorota, Strohalm, Jan, Houška, Milan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081943
_version_ 1783743691945410560
author Wiktor, Artur
Landfeld, Aleš
Matys, Aleksandra
Novotná, Pavla
Dadan, Magdalena
Kováříková, Eliška
Nowacka, Malgorzata
Mulenko, Martin
Witrowa-Rajchert, Dorota
Strohalm, Jan
Houška, Milan
author_facet Wiktor, Artur
Landfeld, Aleš
Matys, Aleksandra
Novotná, Pavla
Dadan, Magdalena
Kováříková, Eliška
Nowacka, Malgorzata
Mulenko, Martin
Witrowa-Rajchert, Dorota
Strohalm, Jan
Houška, Milan
author_sort Wiktor, Artur
collection PubMed
description The aim of this work was to compare selected physicochemical properties of air dried ‘Golden Delicious’ apples, pretreated either by high-pressure processing (HPP), ultrasound (US) or pulsed electric field (PEF). Following parameters of pretreatment were used: HPP–400 MPa for 15 min, US–21 kHz, 180 W for 45 min, PEF–1 kV/cm, 3.5 kJ/kg. The quality of materials was evaluated by their rehydration properties, hygroscopicity, color and total phenolic content. To compare the effectiveness of the utilized methods, determined properties were expressed as relative comparison values against the reference sample obtained without any pretreatment in the same conditions. The performed research demonstrated that properties can be shaped by the application of proper pretreatment methods. For instance, PEF was shown to be the best method for improving water uptake during rehydration, whereas HPP was the most effective in decreasing hygroscopic properties in comparison with untreated dried apples. Among the investigated methods, HPP resulted in the deepest browning and thus total color difference, while the effects of US and PEF were comparable. For all pretreated dried apples, the total phenolic content was lower when compared with reference material, though the smallest drop was found in sonicated samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8393259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83932592021-08-28 Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study Wiktor, Artur Landfeld, Aleš Matys, Aleksandra Novotná, Pavla Dadan, Magdalena Kováříková, Eliška Nowacka, Malgorzata Mulenko, Martin Witrowa-Rajchert, Dorota Strohalm, Jan Houška, Milan Foods Article The aim of this work was to compare selected physicochemical properties of air dried ‘Golden Delicious’ apples, pretreated either by high-pressure processing (HPP), ultrasound (US) or pulsed electric field (PEF). Following parameters of pretreatment were used: HPP–400 MPa for 15 min, US–21 kHz, 180 W for 45 min, PEF–1 kV/cm, 3.5 kJ/kg. The quality of materials was evaluated by their rehydration properties, hygroscopicity, color and total phenolic content. To compare the effectiveness of the utilized methods, determined properties were expressed as relative comparison values against the reference sample obtained without any pretreatment in the same conditions. The performed research demonstrated that properties can be shaped by the application of proper pretreatment methods. For instance, PEF was shown to be the best method for improving water uptake during rehydration, whereas HPP was the most effective in decreasing hygroscopic properties in comparison with untreated dried apples. Among the investigated methods, HPP resulted in the deepest browning and thus total color difference, while the effects of US and PEF were comparable. For all pretreated dried apples, the total phenolic content was lower when compared with reference material, though the smallest drop was found in sonicated samples. MDPI 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8393259/ /pubmed/34441719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081943 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wiktor, Artur
Landfeld, Aleš
Matys, Aleksandra
Novotná, Pavla
Dadan, Magdalena
Kováříková, Eliška
Nowacka, Malgorzata
Mulenko, Martin
Witrowa-Rajchert, Dorota
Strohalm, Jan
Houška, Milan
Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study
title Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study
title_full Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study
title_fullStr Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study
title_short Selected Quality Parameters of Air-Dried Apples Pretreated by High Pressure, Ultrasounds and Pulsed Electric Field—A Comparison Study
title_sort selected quality parameters of air-dried apples pretreated by high pressure, ultrasounds and pulsed electric field—a comparison study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10081943
work_keys_str_mv AT wiktorartur selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT landfeldales selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT matysaleksandra selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT novotnapavla selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT dadanmagdalena selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT kovarikovaeliska selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT nowackamalgorzata selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT mulenkomartin selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT witrowarajchertdorota selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT strohalmjan selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy
AT houskamilan selectedqualityparametersofairdriedapplespretreatedbyhighpressureultrasoundsandpulsedelectricfieldacomparisonstudy