Cargando…
Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia
COVID-19 is a disease-causing coronavirus strain that emerged in December 2019 that led to an ongoing global pandemic. The ability to anticipate the pandemic’s path is critical. This is important in order to determine how to combat and track its spread. COVID-19 data is an example of time-series dat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168660 |
_version_ | 1783743753481093120 |
---|---|
author | Al-Turaiki, Isra Almutlaq, Fahad Alrasheed, Hend Alballa, Norah |
author_facet | Al-Turaiki, Isra Almutlaq, Fahad Alrasheed, Hend Alballa, Norah |
author_sort | Al-Turaiki, Isra |
collection | PubMed |
description | COVID-19 is a disease-causing coronavirus strain that emerged in December 2019 that led to an ongoing global pandemic. The ability to anticipate the pandemic’s path is critical. This is important in order to determine how to combat and track its spread. COVID-19 data is an example of time-series data where several methods can be applied for forecasting. Although various time-series forecasting models are available, it is difficult to draw broad theoretical conclusions regarding their relative merits. This paper presents an empirical evaluation of several time-series models for forecasting COVID-19 cases, recoveries, and deaths in Saudi Arabia. In particular, seven forecasting models were trained using autoregressive integrated moving average, TBATS, exponential smoothing, cubic spline, simple exponential smoothing Holt, and HoltWinters. The models were built using publicly available daily data of COVID-19 during the period of 24 March 2020 to 5 April 2021 reported in Saudi Arabia. The experimental results indicate that the ARIMA model had a smaller prediction error in forecasting confirmed cases, which is consistent with results reported in the literature, while cubic spline showed better predictions for recoveries and deaths. As more data become available, a fluctuation in the forecasting-accuracy metrics was observed, possibly due to abrupt changes in the data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8393561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83935612021-08-28 Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia Al-Turaiki, Isra Almutlaq, Fahad Alrasheed, Hend Alballa, Norah Int J Environ Res Public Health Article COVID-19 is a disease-causing coronavirus strain that emerged in December 2019 that led to an ongoing global pandemic. The ability to anticipate the pandemic’s path is critical. This is important in order to determine how to combat and track its spread. COVID-19 data is an example of time-series data where several methods can be applied for forecasting. Although various time-series forecasting models are available, it is difficult to draw broad theoretical conclusions regarding their relative merits. This paper presents an empirical evaluation of several time-series models for forecasting COVID-19 cases, recoveries, and deaths in Saudi Arabia. In particular, seven forecasting models were trained using autoregressive integrated moving average, TBATS, exponential smoothing, cubic spline, simple exponential smoothing Holt, and HoltWinters. The models were built using publicly available daily data of COVID-19 during the period of 24 March 2020 to 5 April 2021 reported in Saudi Arabia. The experimental results indicate that the ARIMA model had a smaller prediction error in forecasting confirmed cases, which is consistent with results reported in the literature, while cubic spline showed better predictions for recoveries and deaths. As more data become available, a fluctuation in the forecasting-accuracy metrics was observed, possibly due to abrupt changes in the data. MDPI 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8393561/ /pubmed/34444409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168660 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Al-Turaiki, Isra Almutlaq, Fahad Alrasheed, Hend Alballa, Norah Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia |
title | Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia |
title_full | Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia |
title_fullStr | Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia |
title_full_unstemmed | Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia |
title_short | Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia |
title_sort | empirical evaluation of alternative time-series models for covid-19 forecasting in saudi arabia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alturaikiisra empiricalevaluationofalternativetimeseriesmodelsforcovid19forecastinginsaudiarabia AT almutlaqfahad empiricalevaluationofalternativetimeseriesmodelsforcovid19forecastinginsaudiarabia AT alrasheedhend empiricalevaluationofalternativetimeseriesmodelsforcovid19forecastinginsaudiarabia AT alballanorah empiricalevaluationofalternativetimeseriesmodelsforcovid19forecastinginsaudiarabia |