Cargando…

Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia

COVID-19 is a disease-causing coronavirus strain that emerged in December 2019 that led to an ongoing global pandemic. The ability to anticipate the pandemic’s path is critical. This is important in order to determine how to combat and track its spread. COVID-19 data is an example of time-series dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Turaiki, Isra, Almutlaq, Fahad, Alrasheed, Hend, Alballa, Norah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168660
_version_ 1783743753481093120
author Al-Turaiki, Isra
Almutlaq, Fahad
Alrasheed, Hend
Alballa, Norah
author_facet Al-Turaiki, Isra
Almutlaq, Fahad
Alrasheed, Hend
Alballa, Norah
author_sort Al-Turaiki, Isra
collection PubMed
description COVID-19 is a disease-causing coronavirus strain that emerged in December 2019 that led to an ongoing global pandemic. The ability to anticipate the pandemic’s path is critical. This is important in order to determine how to combat and track its spread. COVID-19 data is an example of time-series data where several methods can be applied for forecasting. Although various time-series forecasting models are available, it is difficult to draw broad theoretical conclusions regarding their relative merits. This paper presents an empirical evaluation of several time-series models for forecasting COVID-19 cases, recoveries, and deaths in Saudi Arabia. In particular, seven forecasting models were trained using autoregressive integrated moving average, TBATS, exponential smoothing, cubic spline, simple exponential smoothing Holt, and HoltWinters. The models were built using publicly available daily data of COVID-19 during the period of 24 March 2020 to 5 April 2021 reported in Saudi Arabia. The experimental results indicate that the ARIMA model had a smaller prediction error in forecasting confirmed cases, which is consistent with results reported in the literature, while cubic spline showed better predictions for recoveries and deaths. As more data become available, a fluctuation in the forecasting-accuracy metrics was observed, possibly due to abrupt changes in the data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8393561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83935612021-08-28 Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia Al-Turaiki, Isra Almutlaq, Fahad Alrasheed, Hend Alballa, Norah Int J Environ Res Public Health Article COVID-19 is a disease-causing coronavirus strain that emerged in December 2019 that led to an ongoing global pandemic. The ability to anticipate the pandemic’s path is critical. This is important in order to determine how to combat and track its spread. COVID-19 data is an example of time-series data where several methods can be applied for forecasting. Although various time-series forecasting models are available, it is difficult to draw broad theoretical conclusions regarding their relative merits. This paper presents an empirical evaluation of several time-series models for forecasting COVID-19 cases, recoveries, and deaths in Saudi Arabia. In particular, seven forecasting models were trained using autoregressive integrated moving average, TBATS, exponential smoothing, cubic spline, simple exponential smoothing Holt, and HoltWinters. The models were built using publicly available daily data of COVID-19 during the period of 24 March 2020 to 5 April 2021 reported in Saudi Arabia. The experimental results indicate that the ARIMA model had a smaller prediction error in forecasting confirmed cases, which is consistent with results reported in the literature, while cubic spline showed better predictions for recoveries and deaths. As more data become available, a fluctuation in the forecasting-accuracy metrics was observed, possibly due to abrupt changes in the data. MDPI 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8393561/ /pubmed/34444409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168660 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Al-Turaiki, Isra
Almutlaq, Fahad
Alrasheed, Hend
Alballa, Norah
Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia
title Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia
title_full Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia
title_short Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Time-Series Models for COVID-19 Forecasting in Saudi Arabia
title_sort empirical evaluation of alternative time-series models for covid-19 forecasting in saudi arabia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168660
work_keys_str_mv AT alturaikiisra empiricalevaluationofalternativetimeseriesmodelsforcovid19forecastinginsaudiarabia
AT almutlaqfahad empiricalevaluationofalternativetimeseriesmodelsforcovid19forecastinginsaudiarabia
AT alrasheedhend empiricalevaluationofalternativetimeseriesmodelsforcovid19forecastinginsaudiarabia
AT alballanorah empiricalevaluationofalternativetimeseriesmodelsforcovid19forecastinginsaudiarabia