Cargando…

Geographic Disparities in Referral Rates and Oncologic Outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare cancer. Patients in rural areas may face reduced access to advanced treatments often only available at referral centers. We evaluated the association of referral center treatment with treatment patterns, outcomes, and geography in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sutton, Thomas L., Walker, Brett S., Nabavizadeh, Nima, Grossberg, Aaron, Thomas, Charles R., Lopez, Charles D., Kardosh, Adel, Chen, Emerson Y., Sheppard, Brett C., Mayo, Skye C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10650-6
_version_ 1783743802410795008
author Sutton, Thomas L.
Walker, Brett S.
Nabavizadeh, Nima
Grossberg, Aaron
Thomas, Charles R.
Lopez, Charles D.
Kardosh, Adel
Chen, Emerson Y.
Sheppard, Brett C.
Mayo, Skye C.
author_facet Sutton, Thomas L.
Walker, Brett S.
Nabavizadeh, Nima
Grossberg, Aaron
Thomas, Charles R.
Lopez, Charles D.
Kardosh, Adel
Chen, Emerson Y.
Sheppard, Brett C.
Mayo, Skye C.
author_sort Sutton, Thomas L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare cancer. Patients in rural areas may face reduced access to advanced treatments often only available at referral centers. We evaluated the association of referral center treatment with treatment patterns, outcomes, and geography in patients with ICC. METHODS: We queried the Oregon State Cancer Registry for ICC between 1997 and 2016, collecting clinicopathologic, demographic, and oncologic data. Patients were classified by treatment at a referral center or non-referral center. ‘Crowfly’ distance to the nearest referral center (DRC) was calculated. Outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Over 20 years, 740 patients with ICC had a median age of 66 years. Slightly more than half (n = 424, 57%) were non-referral center treated and 316 (43%) were referral center treated. Referral center treatment increased over time (odds ratio [OR] 1.03/year, p < 0.05). Referral center-treated patients had improved overall survival in all patients (median 9 vs. 4 months, p < 0.001), in the non-metastatic group (median 13 vs. 6 months, p < 0.001), and in patients not receiving liver resection (median 6 vs. 3 months, p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, referral center-treated patients more often underwent chemotherapy, resection, or radiation (all p < 0.05). Increasing DRC (OR 0.98/20 km, p < 0.05) was independently associated with non-referral center treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with ICC who are evaluated at a referral center are more likely to receive treatments associated with better oncologic outcomes, including patients who are not managed with hepatic resection. Increasing the DRC is associated with treatment at a non-referral center; interventions to facilitate referral, such as telemedicine, may lead to improved outcomes for patients with ICC in rural states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8393777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83937772021-08-27 Geographic Disparities in Referral Rates and Oncologic Outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study Sutton, Thomas L. Walker, Brett S. Nabavizadeh, Nima Grossberg, Aaron Thomas, Charles R. Lopez, Charles D. Kardosh, Adel Chen, Emerson Y. Sheppard, Brett C. Mayo, Skye C. Ann Surg Oncol Hepatobiliary Tumors BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare cancer. Patients in rural areas may face reduced access to advanced treatments often only available at referral centers. We evaluated the association of referral center treatment with treatment patterns, outcomes, and geography in patients with ICC. METHODS: We queried the Oregon State Cancer Registry for ICC between 1997 and 2016, collecting clinicopathologic, demographic, and oncologic data. Patients were classified by treatment at a referral center or non-referral center. ‘Crowfly’ distance to the nearest referral center (DRC) was calculated. Outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Over 20 years, 740 patients with ICC had a median age of 66 years. Slightly more than half (n = 424, 57%) were non-referral center treated and 316 (43%) were referral center treated. Referral center treatment increased over time (odds ratio [OR] 1.03/year, p < 0.05). Referral center-treated patients had improved overall survival in all patients (median 9 vs. 4 months, p < 0.001), in the non-metastatic group (median 13 vs. 6 months, p < 0.001), and in patients not receiving liver resection (median 6 vs. 3 months, p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, referral center-treated patients more often underwent chemotherapy, resection, or radiation (all p < 0.05). Increasing DRC (OR 0.98/20 km, p < 0.05) was independently associated with non-referral center treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with ICC who are evaluated at a referral center are more likely to receive treatments associated with better oncologic outcomes, including patients who are not managed with hepatic resection. Increasing the DRC is associated with treatment at a non-referral center; interventions to facilitate referral, such as telemedicine, may lead to improved outcomes for patients with ICC in rural states. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8393777/ /pubmed/34448960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10650-6 Text en © Society of Surgical Oncology 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Hepatobiliary Tumors
Sutton, Thomas L.
Walker, Brett S.
Nabavizadeh, Nima
Grossberg, Aaron
Thomas, Charles R.
Lopez, Charles D.
Kardosh, Adel
Chen, Emerson Y.
Sheppard, Brett C.
Mayo, Skye C.
Geographic Disparities in Referral Rates and Oncologic Outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study
title Geographic Disparities in Referral Rates and Oncologic Outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study
title_full Geographic Disparities in Referral Rates and Oncologic Outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study
title_fullStr Geographic Disparities in Referral Rates and Oncologic Outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Geographic Disparities in Referral Rates and Oncologic Outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study
title_short Geographic Disparities in Referral Rates and Oncologic Outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study
title_sort geographic disparities in referral rates and oncologic outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study
topic Hepatobiliary Tumors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10650-6
work_keys_str_mv AT suttonthomasl geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT walkerbretts geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT nabavizadehnima geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT grossbergaaron geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT thomascharlesr geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT lopezcharlesd geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT kardoshadel geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT chenemersony geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT sheppardbrettc geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT mayoskyec geographicdisparitiesinreferralratesandoncologicoutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy