Cargando…
Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention
A growing number of young people tend to regard their pets as their surrogate children, yet research examining the relationship between pet attachment and fertility intention remains scarce. Moreover, individuals’ fertility intention is affected by economic resources. Therefore, we conducted two stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168610 |
_version_ | 1783743881255321600 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Zhen Ren, Xiaoxing Zhao, Jinzhe Jiao, Liying Xu, Yan |
author_facet | Guo, Zhen Ren, Xiaoxing Zhao, Jinzhe Jiao, Liying Xu, Yan |
author_sort | Guo, Zhen |
collection | PubMed |
description | A growing number of young people tend to regard their pets as their surrogate children, yet research examining the relationship between pet attachment and fertility intention remains scarce. Moreover, individuals’ fertility intention is affected by economic resources. Therefore, we conducted two studies to examine the interaction effect of pet attachment and subjective socioeconomic status (SES) on childbearing-aged individuals’ fertility intention. In Study 1, we utilized questionnaires to measure Chinese pet owners’ pet attachment, subjective SES, and fertility intention. In Study 2, participants’ pet attachment was experimentally manipulated by reading articles about the benefits of petkeeping. The results of the two studies consistently demonstrated that the effect of pet attachment on fertility intention was moderated by subjective SES. Specifically, pet attachment was negatively associated with fertility intention when individuals had a high level of subjective SES, whereas this effect disappeared when individuals had low subjective SES. These findings suggest an explanation for why individuals with high subjective SES delay or even opt out of childbearing. The limitations and implications of the current study are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8394147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83941472021-08-28 Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention Guo, Zhen Ren, Xiaoxing Zhao, Jinzhe Jiao, Liying Xu, Yan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article A growing number of young people tend to regard their pets as their surrogate children, yet research examining the relationship between pet attachment and fertility intention remains scarce. Moreover, individuals’ fertility intention is affected by economic resources. Therefore, we conducted two studies to examine the interaction effect of pet attachment and subjective socioeconomic status (SES) on childbearing-aged individuals’ fertility intention. In Study 1, we utilized questionnaires to measure Chinese pet owners’ pet attachment, subjective SES, and fertility intention. In Study 2, participants’ pet attachment was experimentally manipulated by reading articles about the benefits of petkeeping. The results of the two studies consistently demonstrated that the effect of pet attachment on fertility intention was moderated by subjective SES. Specifically, pet attachment was negatively associated with fertility intention when individuals had a high level of subjective SES, whereas this effect disappeared when individuals had low subjective SES. These findings suggest an explanation for why individuals with high subjective SES delay or even opt out of childbearing. The limitations and implications of the current study are discussed. MDPI 2021-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8394147/ /pubmed/34444359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168610 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Guo, Zhen Ren, Xiaoxing Zhao, Jinzhe Jiao, Liying Xu, Yan Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention |
title | Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention |
title_full | Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention |
title_fullStr | Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention |
title_short | Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention |
title_sort | can pets replace children? the interaction effect of pet attachment and subjective socioeconomic status on fertility intention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guozhen canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention AT renxiaoxing canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention AT zhaojinzhe canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention AT jiaoliying canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention AT xuyan canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention |