Cargando…

Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention

A growing number of young people tend to regard their pets as their surrogate children, yet research examining the relationship between pet attachment and fertility intention remains scarce. Moreover, individuals’ fertility intention is affected by economic resources. Therefore, we conducted two stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Zhen, Ren, Xiaoxing, Zhao, Jinzhe, Jiao, Liying, Xu, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168610
_version_ 1783743881255321600
author Guo, Zhen
Ren, Xiaoxing
Zhao, Jinzhe
Jiao, Liying
Xu, Yan
author_facet Guo, Zhen
Ren, Xiaoxing
Zhao, Jinzhe
Jiao, Liying
Xu, Yan
author_sort Guo, Zhen
collection PubMed
description A growing number of young people tend to regard their pets as their surrogate children, yet research examining the relationship between pet attachment and fertility intention remains scarce. Moreover, individuals’ fertility intention is affected by economic resources. Therefore, we conducted two studies to examine the interaction effect of pet attachment and subjective socioeconomic status (SES) on childbearing-aged individuals’ fertility intention. In Study 1, we utilized questionnaires to measure Chinese pet owners’ pet attachment, subjective SES, and fertility intention. In Study 2, participants’ pet attachment was experimentally manipulated by reading articles about the benefits of petkeeping. The results of the two studies consistently demonstrated that the effect of pet attachment on fertility intention was moderated by subjective SES. Specifically, pet attachment was negatively associated with fertility intention when individuals had a high level of subjective SES, whereas this effect disappeared when individuals had low subjective SES. These findings suggest an explanation for why individuals with high subjective SES delay or even opt out of childbearing. The limitations and implications of the current study are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8394147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83941472021-08-28 Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention Guo, Zhen Ren, Xiaoxing Zhao, Jinzhe Jiao, Liying Xu, Yan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article A growing number of young people tend to regard their pets as their surrogate children, yet research examining the relationship between pet attachment and fertility intention remains scarce. Moreover, individuals’ fertility intention is affected by economic resources. Therefore, we conducted two studies to examine the interaction effect of pet attachment and subjective socioeconomic status (SES) on childbearing-aged individuals’ fertility intention. In Study 1, we utilized questionnaires to measure Chinese pet owners’ pet attachment, subjective SES, and fertility intention. In Study 2, participants’ pet attachment was experimentally manipulated by reading articles about the benefits of petkeeping. The results of the two studies consistently demonstrated that the effect of pet attachment on fertility intention was moderated by subjective SES. Specifically, pet attachment was negatively associated with fertility intention when individuals had a high level of subjective SES, whereas this effect disappeared when individuals had low subjective SES. These findings suggest an explanation for why individuals with high subjective SES delay or even opt out of childbearing. The limitations and implications of the current study are discussed. MDPI 2021-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8394147/ /pubmed/34444359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168610 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guo, Zhen
Ren, Xiaoxing
Zhao, Jinzhe
Jiao, Liying
Xu, Yan
Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention
title Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention
title_full Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention
title_fullStr Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention
title_full_unstemmed Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention
title_short Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention
title_sort can pets replace children? the interaction effect of pet attachment and subjective socioeconomic status on fertility intention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168610
work_keys_str_mv AT guozhen canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention
AT renxiaoxing canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention
AT zhaojinzhe canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention
AT jiaoliying canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention
AT xuyan canpetsreplacechildrentheinteractioneffectofpetattachmentandsubjectivesocioeconomicstatusonfertilityintention